lsn5.2 Flashcards

1
Q

What does Intellectual Property (IP) law regulate and what are its two main categories?

A

IP law regulates rights and obligations related to creations of the mind, such as inventions, designs, branding, and artistic works. It is divided into two main categories:

Industrial property: includes patents, trademarks, industrial designs, and geographical indications.
Copyright and related rights: protects literary and artistic works, such as books, music, and films.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three main issues addressed by Private International Law (PIL) in cross-border disputes?

A

Jurisdiction: Determining which court has the authority to hear the case.
Applicable law: Deciding which country’s laws should govern the resolution of the dispute.
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: Whether a foreign court’s judgment, especially regarding IP issues, will be recognized and enforced in another country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the globalization of markets impact the relationship between IP law and PIL?

A

As markets become more global, IP law faces challenges in cross-border transactions, where intellectual property, such as patents and trademarks, is increasingly used across different jurisdictions. PIL becomes crucial in determining:

Which court has jurisdiction over international IP disputes.
Which country’s laws apply when IP is infringed or disputed across borders.
Whether a foreign court’s IP-related decision can be recognized and enforced internationally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can the relationship between IP law and PIL be both harmonious and tense?

A

Harmonious: When countries’ IP laws align through international agreements (e.g., TRIPS Agreement), facilitating consistent protection and enforcement of IP across borders.
Tense: When countries have conflicting IP laws, such as differing standards for patentability or trademark protection, or when enforcing a foreign judgment in one jurisdiction proves difficult due to discrepancies in legal frameworks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the key challenges at the intersection of IP law and PIL?

A

Jurisdictional issues: Deciding which court has the authority to hear international IP disputes.
Choice of law: Determining which country’s laws should apply when an IP issue spans multiple jurisdictions.
Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments: Ensuring that IP-related decisions made in one country are recognized and enforced in another, particularly when the IP laws differ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What types of Private International Law (PIL) issues arise in IP disputes?

A

Jurisdiction: Determining which court has authority to hear the case.
Applicable Law: Deciding which country’s laws should govern the dispute.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Whether decisions made in one country regarding IP can be enforced in another country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the common dispute resolution mechanisms used in IP-related PIL disputes?

A

Court Adjudication: When courts in different countries handle cross-border IP disputes.
IP Administrative Procedures: Administrative processes (like patent or trademark offices) to resolve IP issues.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Methods like arbitration, mediation, and conciliation to resolve disputes without going to court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), especially arbitration, preferred in IP disputes?

A

Resolution in a single forum: ADR can address multijurisdictional disputes in one proceeding, avoiding multiple courts.
Minimized jurisdictional and law challenges: Parties can bypass complications of jurisdiction and choosing applicable law in different countries.
Internationally enforceable awards: Arbitration decisions are often recognized and enforceable across different countries.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the key IP issues often involved in Private International Law (PIL) disputes?

A

Validity: Disputes over the validity of IP rights across different jurisdictions.
Ownership: Determining who owns the IP rights.
Infringement: Identifying if IP rights are being violated in different countries.
Contractual Issues: Disagreements over IP-related contracts like licensing or distribution agreements in multiple jurisdictions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When does Private International Law (PIL) intersect with Intellectual Property (IP) law?

A

PIL intersects with IP law when there is a foreign element in the dispute, such as:

Parties being in different states.
The place of infringement being in a foreign state.
Damage occurring in a foreign state.
The IP right being registered or originating in a foreign state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the key issues in PIL-IP disputes?

A

Jurisdiction: Which court has the authority to adjudicate the dispute?
Applicable Law: Which country’s laws should be applied to the case?
Recognition and Enforcement: Can a judgment made in one country be recognized and enforced in another?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why is the territorial nature of IP a challenge in PIL-IP disputes?

A

IP protection is inherently territorial, meaning it applies within the boundaries of a specific country. However, globalization and digital activities often lead to cross-border disputes, making it difficult to apply IP laws consistently across jurisdictions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What role do intermediaries play in PIL-IP disputes?

A

Intermediaries, such as internet service providers or platforms hosting content, are often involved in cross-border IP disputes. Courts must determine their responsibilities, especially in cases of online infringement that allows global access to protected works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the role of the HCCH Choice of Court Agreements Convention in IP disputes?

A

The HCCH Choice of Court Agreements Convention ensures the effectiveness of exclusive choice-of-court agreements in civil or commercial matters, including IP disputes. It provides rules for jurisdiction and the recognition of judgments, ensuring enforceability across member states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the general rule under the Brussels Ia Regulation for jurisdiction in the EU?

A

The Brussels Ia Regulation states that a defendant shall be sued in the Member State where they are domiciled. However, specific rules may allow the defendant to be sued in another Member State for sound administration of justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does the Rome I Regulation determine the applicable law for contractual obligations in IP disputes?

A

The Rome I Regulation allows parties to choose the applicable law for their contracts. If no choice is made, the law of the state where the party performing the contract’s characteristic obligation resides is applied, unless the contract is closely connected to another state.

17
Q

What does the Rome II Regulation address in the context of IP disputes?

A

The Rome II Regulation deals with non-contractual obligations, such as IP infringement. It provides specific rules to determine the applicable law in cross-border IP disputes, often applying the law of the country where the infringement occurred.

18
Q

What are the key goals of the international IP system in relation to PIL?

A

Affirming the territorial nature of IP rights:
IP rights apply within specific national borders and are independent in each country.
Example: Patents or trademarks granted in one country do not affect those in others.

Harmonizing national IP laws:
Establishes minimum standards (e.g., TRIPS Agreement) to reduce differences between national IP laws.
Facilitates more consistent protection across countries.

Granting national treatment to foreign IP owners:
Foreign nationals receive the same legal protection as domestic nationals (e.g., Article 3 of the TRIPS Agreement).

19
Q

What does the principle of territorial independence mean for IP rights?

A

IP rights are granted and enforced separately in each country.
Once granted, rights in one country remain unaffected by the status of the same rights in other countries.
like A patent granted in the US is independent of a patent for the same invention in Germany.

20
Q

How do international IP treaties address conflict of laws in cross-border disputes?

A

National Treatment as a Conflict of Laws Rule:

Example: The Berne Convention (Article 2(1)) and TRIPS Agreement require foreign IP owners to be treated like nationals.

Lex Loci Protectionis:
Governs that the applicable law for IP disputes is the law of the country where protection is claimed.
Example: Berne Convention (Article 5(2)) applies this principle to copyright infringement.

Challenges for Online Activities:
Applying territorial laws to online infringements (e.g., simultaneous violations in multiple countries) is complex.
Example: The EU Satellite Broadcasting Directive defines “the country where protection is sought” as the country of signal origin for broadcasts.

21
Q

What role do regional and international IP registration systems play in PIL?

A

Regional Harmonization:
Regional organizations like the EU and ARIPO simplify and standardize IP laws within their regions.
Example: The EU provides unitary IP rights (e.g., EU trademarks) covering all member states, interpreted by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU)

International Systems:
Allow streamlined protection in multiple countries through a single application.
Examples:
Madrid Protocol: Facilitates international trademark registration.
European Patent Convention: Grants European patents valid in multiple countries.

Mutual Independence of IP Rights:
Even when obtained through international systems, IP rights remain territorial unless explicitly supranational (e.g., EU trademarks).

22
Q

What are instruments that facilitate obtaining a bundle of IP rights, and how do they function?

A

These instruments allow applicants to file one application to secure IP rights across multiple jurisdictions. Once granted, the rights are governed and enforced by national or regional laws. Examples include:
WIPO Systems:
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) for patents.
Madrid System for trademarks.
Hague System for industrial designs.
Lisbon System for appellations of origin.
Regional Protocols:
Harare Protocol (ARIPO) for patents and designs in Africa.
Banjul Protocol (ARIPO) for trademarks in Africa.
European Patent Convention (EPC) for European patents.
Eurasian Patent Convention (EAPO) for patents in Eurasian countries.

23
Q

What are supranational IP rights, and how are they enforced?

A

Supranational IP rights are unitary rights that are valid across multiple jurisdictions without needing separate registrations. Examples include:
European Union Trademarks (EUTMR): Valid across the EU, enforced by national courts acting as EU courts.
Community Design Rights: Follow similar rules to EU trademarks.
Unitary Patent Protection (UPP): Builds on the EPC and covers up to 25 EU member states, enforced by the Unified Patent Court (UPC).
Bangui Agreement (OAPI): Grants rights across African member states under a uniform administrative system, but enforcement relies on national courts.
Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Patent System: Offers a single patent valid across GCC member states.

24
Q

What is the Unified Patent Court (UPC), and what is its role?

A

The UPC is a specialized court system created for the enforcement of European patents with unitary effect, classical European patents, and supplementary protection certificates. It includes:
A Court of First Instance, a Court of Appeal, and a Registry.
It operates independently from national courts and has exclusive competence in civil litigation involving these patents.
Purpose: To streamline enforcement across EU states under UPP, avoiding multiple national court processes.

25
Q

What are soft law initiatives, and how do they address IP and PIL?

A

Soft law initiatives are non-binding frameworks guiding the resolution of cross-border IP disputes. Examples include:

2015 HCCH Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts: Promotes party autonomy in choosing governing law for IP licensing and transfer contracts.
American Law Institute (ALI) Principles (2008): Provides jurisdiction, choice of law, and judgment guidelines for transnational IP disputes.
European Max Planck Group’s CLIP Principles (2011): Focus on conflict-of-law rules for IP disputes.
Transparency of Japanese Law Project (2009): Proposes jurisdiction and recognition rules for IP cases in Japan.

26
Q

What are the key WIPO systems for international IP rights, and what do they cover?

A

Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT): Simplifies patent applications in multiple countries through a single procedure.
Madrid System: Centralizes trademark registration for multiple countries.
Hague System: Facilitates international registration of industrial designs.
Lisbon System: Protects geographic indicators like appellations of origin.
These systems reduce administrative burdens for applicants while ensuring rights are governed and enforced by individual member states’ laws

27
Q

How is jurisdiction handled in supranational IP systems?

A

Jurisdiction in supranational systems depends on specific rules:
EU Trademarks and Designs: Enforced in national courts designated as EU trademark or design courts.
Unified Patent Court (UPC): Handles European patents with unitary effect, bypassing national court systems.
OAPI: Rights are enforced in national courts of member states using uniform Bangui Agreement rules.
Bangui Agreement for Patents: Specifies that legal proceedings must be initiated in the court of the location of infringement.

These jurisdictional arrangements aim to streamline enforcement while ensuring uniformity.