Licencing & Domain ls 4 Flashcards
What are the essential components of a licensing agreement, and why are they important?
Identification of the Parties: Clearly identifies the licensor (owner of the intellectual property) and the licensee (party receiving the rights).
Objective and Scope: Specifies the purpose of the agreement, defining what is being licensed (e.g., patents, trademarks, know-how) and the geographical/industry scope.
Remuneration Terms: Defines how the licensee compensates the licensor, either directly (fees, royalties) or indirectly (dividends, savings).
Duration and Termination: States the agreement’s timeframe and conditions for renewal or termination.
IP Rights and Obligations: Outlines the licensor’s rights and the licensee’s permitted use of the IP.
What are the different types of licenses, and how do they differ in terms of exclusivity?
Exclusive License: Grants rights solely to one licensee, even excluding the licensor.
Sole License: Similar to exclusive, but the licensor retains the right to use the IP.
Simple License: Allows the licensor to grant similar rights to multiple licensees.
Non-Exclusive License: When a simple license is already granted, meaning the licensee has no exclusive privileges.
Most Favored License Clause: Guarantees that the licensee gets terms as favorable as those given to any other licensee.
What are the key forms of direct remuneration in a licensing agreement?
Lump Sum: A one-time, upfront payment, often negotiated as an estimate of the IP’s value.
Royalties: Payments based on a percentage of the licensee’s revenue or profit from using the IP.
Service Fees: Payments for consultancy or other services provided by the licensor as part of the licensing deal.
How can indirect remuneration benefit the licensor in a licensing agreement?
Income from Related Operations: Profits generated from collaborative ventures using the IP.
Dividends: Payments from the licensee’s profits, subject to national legislation.
Cost-Sharing: Shared expenses for research, development, or marketing of the licensed product.
Market Information: Insights or data shared by the licensee that enhance the licensor’s strategy.
Savings: Reduced costs for the licensor through economies of scale or operational efficiencies.
Why and to what extent do governments regulate intellectual property licenses?
Why? To ensure fair market practices, prevent monopolies, protect national interests, and promote innovation.
Extent? Regulations may cover approval of licensing terms, restrictions on technology transfer, or competition law compliance.
By Whom? Government agencies, competition authorities, and patent or trademark offices.
What arrangements go beyond traditional licensing, and how do they differ?
Franchising: The franchisor provides the business model and branding, with the franchisee running the operations.
Turn-Key Projects: The provider designs and delivers a fully operational project, ready for the licensee to run.
Joint Ventures: Two or more entities collaborate to develop and commercialize IP.
Assignment of IPRs: The outright sale of intellectual property rights, transferring ownership to the buyer.
What is a domain name, and why is it used?
A domain name is part of the internet’s transport layer that replaces hard-to-remember IP addresses (e.g., 69.63.176.13) with easier names (e.g., facebook.com). It is a hierarchical system managed by ICANN, with TLDs like .com, .net, and .org
What are the different types of TLDs, and who controls them?
Generic TLDs (gTLDs): Like .com, .net, and .org.
Country Code TLDs (ccTLDs): Like .uk (UK) and .it (Italy).
New gTLDs: Introduced since 2013, include .xyz, .berlin, and .photography.
Each TLD is managed by a registry (e.g., Verisign for .com). Non-Latin script TLDs for countries like Russia and China are also available
What mechanisms exist for resolving domain name disputes?
gTLD Disputes: Handled by dispute resolution providers authorized by ICANN, such as UDRP or URS.
ccTLD Disputes: Managed by the registry of the specific country (e.g., Nominet for .uk).
Resolution mechanisms:
Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS): Provides quick, temporary suspension of a domain name.
Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP): Allows the transfer of the domain name to the successful complainant.
The URS is faster but only suspends the domain, while UDRP offers full transfer rights.
What are the common types of domain name disputes?
Concurrent rights: Disputes over who has the right to register a domain name first.
Domain name theft: When a third party illegitimately transfers a domain name to themselves.
Cybersquatting: Registering or using a domain name in bad faith, often to profit from someone else’s trademark.
Passing off: Registering a domain that reflects the branding or trading name of a competitor.
Grievance or “gripe” sites: Registering a domain (e.g., .sucks) to criticize a company or its trademarks.
What are the practical measures for resolving a domain name dispute?
Do Nothing: If the domain is not harming your business, it may not be worth pursuing.
Approach the Registrant:
Send a cease and desist letter asking for the domain transfer.
Offer to purchase the domain or persuade the registrant to add a disclaimer or a link to your website.
Approach the ISP: If the domain usage violates the ISP’s terms (e.g., illegal activities), request the suspension of the registrant’s account.
What are the formal dispute resolution options for domain name disputes?
UDRP: Used for disputes involving gTLDs (e.g., .com) or ccTLDs where the country opts in.
Nominet Dispute Resolution: For .uk domain disputes.
EURid ADR: For .eu domain disputes.
Litigation: In cases of trademark infringement or defamation.
What defenses can a respondent use in a URS case?
Legitimate Use of Domain:
The respondent can prove they have a legitimate right or interest in the domain (e.g., using a descriptive name for a business or non-commercial use).
Good Faith Registration:
The respondent can argue the domain name was registered in good faith, with no intent to harm the complainant’s business or exploit their trademark.
No Confusing Similarity:
The respondent can argue that the domain name is not identical or confusingly similar to the complainant’s trademark, and does not lead to consumer confusion.
What is cybersquatting, and what are typical examples of it?
Cybersquatting is the registration and/or use of a domain name in bad faith, typically to profit from another company’s trademark. like elling the domain to the trademark holder or competitors.
What activities are not considered cybersquatting?
Legitimate Use: If the registrant has legitimate rights in the domain name or uses it for non-commercial purposes.
Trademark Infringement: Not all cases of domain name disputes are cybersquatting. Trademark infringement may occur in content or code without cybersquatting being involved.
What legal remedies are available for cybersquatting, and how are they different from other remedies?
Trade Mark Infringement: Can be actionable under the Trade Marks Act 1994 or Community Trade Mark regulations.
Passing Off: A claim that someone is damaging the trademark holder’s goodwill by using a similar domain name.
Defensive Registrations: Trademark owners may register variations of their brand name across multiple domain extensions to prevent cybersquatting.