Lsat: Reading Comprehension Flashcards
Reading comprehension passages usually contain
one Science passage, one Law-Related
passage, and one Humanities passage featuring Diversity. The remaining
passage is usually drawn from a humanities field such as history or
economics, but occasionally the passage comes from science or law.
when approaching LSAT passages your
emphasis should be on
big picture elements (main point, tone and attitude,
general structure) instead of every detail, and also on the views/viewpoints
presented, both the author’s and those of other people/groups.
first read the entire passage with an eye towards capturing
the main
ideas, viewpoints, tone, and structure of the passage, and then proceed to
the questions, answering them in order unless you encounter a question too
difficult to answer.
all high-scoring LSAT takers read the passage before
looking at the questions.
At the start of the section, quickly preview the four passage sets, and
choose the one you feel most comfortable with from a topic
standpoint.
Always read the passage first. Read for
an understanding of
structure and detail, viewpoints and themes, and the author’s tone.
Many students approach the passages as academic learning exercises
and hope to find some fun new fact or interesting information (don’t
laugh, it happens often!). When you begin reading with the
expectation that you will learn something new, the passage becomes
easier to read and more engaging.
Some students approach the passages as puzzles to solve, as if they
have been challenged to navigate a maze of sorts (and this is a fairly
accurate description). For certain personalities, the idea of a beatable
challenge stimulates their competitive nature and makes
it easier for
them to focus.
As a reader, anticipating what will come next in the passage is
a habit you should seek to cultivate. . By constantly thinking about the possible directions
the author can take, you will gain a richer perspective on the story being
told and be better prepared for the twists and turns most passages exhibit.
Notwithstanding
in spite of
One of the most powerful weapons the test makers possess is the ability to
manipulate language, and specifically to create sentences that contain a
large amount of information while simultaneously being difficult to
understand and interpret.
To combat killer sentences, follow these steps as you break them down:
Slow down and relax. Recognize that killer sentences are really a collection of connected
thoughts, meaning you can break down the sentence into smaller,
component pieces. To do so, use the punctuation marks in the
sentence as natural separators to. Commas, dashes, semi-colons, and
colons each indicate natural stopping points in the text, and thus you
can usually divide each sentence into more manageable sections. Given that you already know the sentence, or series of sentences, is a
difficult one, make a mark next to the passage (we suggest using a
simple bracket). This helps you keep tabs on where the hardest parts
of the passage are, and also helps you quickly locate those areas if
questions are asked that reference the information.
Comma [ , ]:
Commas appear in many sentences, and usually are used
to separate ideas in some manner. As such, they are natural stopping
points, and help divide a sentence into smaller pieces. Two commas in a
sentence often bookend a standalone idea that is related to but separate
from the main idea being expressed.
Colon [ : ]:
A colon typically precedes either an explanation of the point
prior to the colon, or introduces a list of some sort.
Semi-colon [ ; ]:
The ideas on either side of a semi-colon are related but
also could stand on their own as complete sentences. In this sense, a
semi-colon is stronger than a comma, but less definitive than a period.
Parentheses [ ( ) ]:
The information in parentheses typically expands
upon and adds additional details to the sentence.
Dash [ — ]:
Dashes are extremely versatile, and are often substituted
for other punctuation marks (most notably commas, colons, and
parenthesis), but the purpose is typically to set apart a particular idea.
“for example
typically expands and
clarifies the idea that immediately precedes it, often by providing an individual
instance of a broader idea or belief. Thus, the main idea of the sentence (or the
passage) is not usually in the “for example” section, but instead just before it.
At the end of the passage you should be able to answer these
questions:
-What is the Main Point of the passage?
-What is the author driving
at?
-Why was this written?
-Which groups are speaking or are talked about in the passage? In
other words, who said what?
-What’s the tone or attitude of each group? Angry? Disappointed?
Neutral?
-What is the very basic position or argument of each group?
-Nothing complex, more along the lines of, “The environmentalist’s
are for the passage of the bill and the opponent’s think the bill will
hurt the economy. The author is neutral.”
-Last, but not least, what’s the structure of the passage? Can you
make a mental map of where the ideas appear in the passage?
VIEW =
the different VIEWpoints in the passage
S=
the Structure of the passage
T =
the Tone of the passage
A =
the Arguments in the passage
MP =
the Main Point
VIEWSTAMP is a
mental tracking tool that focuses your
attention on the ideas and elements most likely to produce questions.
Seek to understand not just what the author said in the paragraph,
but
why the author made those statements. What’s the greater point that’s
being presented? How does each element perform in service to that point?
you can summarize the main point in
a single sentence or two at most.
The vast majority of Reading Comprehension questions are
Must Be True and Main Point variants. Thus, you are typically on a fact-finding mission when
reading an RC passage. This means you are reading for knowledge and
understanding, and not as much for things such as Assumptions and what
would weaken or strengthen the argument (as in Logical Reasoning).
Work to get a grasp of what was said and why, and worry less about
what weaknesses the passage has or what assumptions were made.
VIEWSTAMP will take the following order, as this is the
most logical order of analysis:
- The various groups and viewpoints discussed within the passage.
- The tone or attitude of each group or individual.
- The argument made by each group or individual.
- The main point of the passage.
- The structure of the passage and the organization of ideas.
A viewpoint is
the position or approach taken by a person or group.
What is the value of tracking all of the viewpoints in
a given Reading Comprehension passage?
- Tracking the viewpoints will help you disentangle the mass of
information contained in every Reading Comprehension passage. - Within the questions, you will be asked to identify the viewpoints
presented in the passages and to differentiate between those
viewpoints. Answer choices will often present different viewpoints in
order to test your ability to distinguish between groups.
An opinion presented without reference to any group is
typically the author’s
opinion.
In an effort to confuse test takers, the test makers sometimes introduce
two viewpoints in a single sentence,
Tone/Attitude is
the state of mind or feeling that each group
expresses on the subject matter at hand, and for our purposes, “attitude”
and “tone” will be used interchangeably.
The author’s attitude is usually revealed through
word choice.
Most LSAT authors do not display
an extreme attitude or tone.
Note also that tone is representative of the passage
as a whole, and not just
of a single section.
the tone exhibited in the last few lines would not
override or outweigh the positive support that the author displayed earlier.
In examining attitude, you must
carefully consider the word choices used by
the author of the passage. The rule is that small changes in word choice can
have a large effect on the overall tone of the passage.
a premise can be defined as:
“A fact, proposition, or statement from which a conclusion is made.”
Premises support and
explain the conclusion.
the premises give
the reasons why the conclusion should be accepted.
To identify premises,
ask yourself,
“What reasons has the author used to persuade me? Why should
I believe this argument? What evidence exists?”
A premise gives a reason why
something should be believed.
“A statement or judgment that follows from
one or more reasons.”
Conclusions, as summary statements, are supposed to be
drawn from and
rest on the premises.
A conclusion is the point the author tries to prove by
using another statement.
Premise Indicators
Because, since, for, for example, for the reason that, in that, given that, as indicated by, due to, owing to, this can be seen from, we know this by.
Conclusion indicators
thus, therefore, hence, consequently, as a result, so, accordingly, clearly, must be that, shows that, conclude that, follows that.
Identifying conclusions often helps in
identifying the main point of a passage.
Additional premise Indicators
Furthermore, moreover, besides, in addition, what’s more, after all.
Counter-argument indicators, also called adversatives, bring up
points of
opposition or comparison.
Counter-Argument Indicators
but, yet, however, on the other hand, admittedly, in contrast, although, even though, still, whereas, in spite of, despite, after all.
the easiest way to determine the
conclusion in an argument is to use the Conclusion Identification
Method
TM:
Take the statements under consideration for the conclusion and place
them in an arrangement that forces one to be the conclusion and the
other(s) to be the premise(s). Use premise and conclusion indicators to achieve this end. Once the pieces are arranged, determine if the arrangement makes logical sense. If so, you have made the correct identification. If not, reverse the arrangement and examine the
relationship again. Continue until you find an arrangement that is the
most logical.
an assumption is simply the same
as an unstated premise
—what must be true in order for the argument to be true.
assumptions are ideas that are
required for the author’s argument to be
potentially acceptable. They don’t guarantee the correctness of the
argument, but they do prevent the argument from being immediately
dismissible as false
assumptions can often have a great effect on the
validity of the argument.
an
inference is
what follows from a set of known premises (in other words, a
conclusion)
whereas an assumption is
what is taken for granted while
making an argument.
In one sense, an assumption occurs “before” the
argument, that is, while the argument is being made. An inference is made
“after” the initial information is known, and follows from given
facts/argument.
The makers of the LSAT love to use complex argumentation because the
presence of
multiple conclusions tends to confuse test takers, making attractive
wrong answer choices easier to create.
Quantity Indicators
All, every, most, many, some, several, few, sole, only, not all, none.
Probability Indicators
Must, will, always, not always, probably, likely, would, not necessarily, could, rarely, never.
Quantity Indicators refer to the
amount or quantity in the relationship,
such as “some people” or “many of the laws.”
Probability indicators refer to
the
likelihood of occurrence, or the obligation present
Indicator lists are important for several reasons:
- They help you identify the main elements of the author’s argument.
- They help you identify supplementary argument points made by the
author. - They show you when the author introduces viewpoints other than his
or her own. - They alert you to changes in the direction of the argument.
- They alert you to the strength of the various points made by the
author.
The main point of a passage is
the central idea, or ultimate conclusion, that the author is attempting to prove.
Although in the majority of passages the
main point is
stated in the first paragraph, it is not always the case that the main point appears the very outset.
The main point of many passages has
appeared in the
final sentence of the first paragraph or in the first sentence
of the second paragraph, or, at times, in the last paragraph.
although
the main point is often found early in the first paragraph, the test makers
have the ability to
place the main point anywhere in the passage.
The main point of a passage is
the central idea that the author is attempting to
prove or relay.
Built into your test taking strategy should be the
expectation that you will frequently
return to the passage during the
questions to confirm and disconfirm answer choices.
Some passages open by stating the background of a
thesis that will be challenged later in the passage. In the following
paragraphs the author will then present an alternative viewpoint to the
thesis and perhaps specific counterexamples which provide support for the
alternative view. Awareness of this general structure will
allow you to
reduce the time you spend searching for information when you need to refer
back to the text.
You simply need to get the gist of what is occurring in the
paragraph so you can
quickly return if needed to answer a question.
“Lawyers are concerned about the plan’s effect on prices; directors of
the plan claim that everyone benefits.” Should a question ask about the views of lawyers,
you would know to return to the
Paragraph that states this view.
Your structural analysis must be
compact enough to be mentally
retained, and it must also provide enough basic detail to serve as a guide when you return to the passage.
When you encounter unknown words, they will fall into one of two
categories:
new terms related to the concept under discussion or
unknown vocabulary words.
In the case of terms related to the concept under discussion, the test makers will
explain the term or concept for you in the text, sometimes briefly using
synonyms, other times in greater detail. Unknown vocabulary words
can be more challenging, but you can use context clues from the surrounding text to help determine the meaning of words you do not
recognize.
A common and easy
way for the test makers to increase difficulty is
to add more viewpoints.
The more viewpoints present, the easier
it is for
readers to confuse them, or forget who said what.
when more viewpoints are present, the test
makers typically
insert extensive compare-and-contrast sections, which makes separating and mastering each view more difficult.
The difficulty of a passage set is also affected by
the nature of the
questions.
if you can tell after reading the first few lines of
a passage that it looks particularly challenging, consider
moving on to
another passage.
This test makers’ weapon (the order of the passages) is one of the easiest to
overcome: If you know
that the passages might not be presented in ideal order,
simply choose your favorites first.
Some students prefer the comparative reading passages, which tend to be
shorter, so those are
the first they consider when beginning the Reading
Comprehension section.
In reality, within 10 to 15 seconds of reading a passage (not skimming), it is often possible to
assess two key factors:
- Whether or not the topic is one of inherent interest to you.
- Whether the passage is written in a style that you find relatively easy
to understand from the outset
Separating viewpoints allows you to
divide the passage into logical,
trackable components, and helps you to more easily understand the passage
and to disentangle the many disparate ideas presented.
Viewpoints also play
a central role in
the main themes of the passage, so naturally they serve as the source of many of the questions asked by the test makers.
while reading you must always focus on
identifying
each viewpoint in the passage.
Competing perspectives offer
differing opinions on the same subject.
When considering viewpoints, be aware that one of the test makers’ favorite
tricks is to
use competing perspectives, a tactic that involves presenting two
or more viewpoints on the same subject, with each view containing slightly
different elements (while also offering moments of overlap and similarity).
Since competing perspectives can be quite tricky to follow it is easy to
confuse or misremember different views in the context of entire passages it
should come as no surprise that questions about these elements closely test
whether you understand the exact differences between the various
viewpoints on offer.
text-based questions will often be
smaller pieces,
sometimes just a single word, other times a short section of the text.
Note these elements as you encounter them in the passages; you are likely to see
them again in the questions
- Initial Information/Closing Information
- Dates and Numbers
- Definitions
- Examples
- Difficult words or phrases
6.Enumerations/Lists - Text Questions
the information presented in the last five lines is
often forgotten
because the average student is eager to jump to the questions and thus
skims over the material at the very end of the passage.
they occasionally
question you on your knowledge of information seen at
the very beginning
or end of the passage.
When an LSAT author references more than one date or era, creating a
simple
timeline can be an effective way to maintain relative perspective, whether the
comparisons span days or centuries.
Dates often provide
useful markers within a passage, allowing you “before”
and “after” points to return to when searching for answers.
While in some
passages the use of dates is incidental, in other passages,
a clear chronology
is created, and then some of the questions will test your ability to
understand the timeline.
The general rule is that the more dates you see in a passage, particularly if they are given in regular intervals or serve as identifiers of progress or
change, the
more important it is that you make note of them.
Numbers are usually less important than
dates, but when numbers are used
in a comparative sense, or as part of an explanation, the test makers will
sometimes check your comprehension of their meaning.
Whenever you see a brand new term or concept defined, be sure to
take note; if
the test makers have provided a clear definition or description, they generally
expect you to be able to locate the reference.
LSAT authors often use examples to
explain or underscore or even attempt
to prove the points, they are making.
Examples are not the
main conclusion or point of the author; the point being
supported or explained by the example is the author’s central belief.
generally, examples are provided to
support or explain the main
conclusion.
The words “for example” are the most common way that examples are
introduced, but the following terms all have been used:
For example
For instance
A case in point is
As shown by
As demonstrated by
A number of passages feature sections where the author presents a view by
providing a list of points that support or explain the position, or that are
possible outcomes of a course of action. When these lists occur, you are
almost always tested on your understanding of some or all of the items on
the list.
when a
passage contains a list of two or more items, chances are
nearly 100% that
at least one question will be asked in reference to it.
The listed items do not appear as bullet points. Rather, they tend appear
using constructions similar to one of the following:
“First…Second…Third…”
“First…Second…In addition…”
“First…Second…Third…Last…”
“(1)…(2)…”
“Initially…And…Further…”
“One possibility is…another possibility is…A final possibility…”
The lists usually contain one of two types of items:
A list of reasons
(premises) that explain why an action was taken or why a circumstance
came into being, or a list of examples that relate to the point at hand.
lists usually contain one of two types of items:
a list of reasons
(premises) that explain why an action was taken or why a circumstance
came into being, or a list of examples that relate to the point at hand.
When reading, you must be prepared to encounter lists of items that are not
clearly marked as such in the text.
Any time an author presents
a series of examples (or a series of anything, for that matter), you should
recognize it and expect to refer back to it when you begin answering the
questions.
When an author poses a question in the passage, in most instances the
author goes on to immediately
answer that question.
tracking the
presence of text questions is critical because it
provides you with an outline
for where the passage will go next.
because these questions are often
central to the theme of the passage, there is usually a
post-passage question
that centers on the answer to the question the author posed.
Most often, text questions are raised in the
traditional, explicit manner, with
a question mark,
Text questions can be explicitly or implicitly
presented in the passage.
The cause is the event that makes
the other occur; the effect is the event that follows from the
cause.
Cause and effect reasoning asserts or denies that
one thing causes
another, or that one thing is caused by another.
By definition, the cause must occur before
the effect, and the
cause is the “activator” or “ignitor” in the relationship.
The effect
always happens at
some point in time after the cause.
Causality in Reading Comprehension usually is discussed in the context
of
why certain events occurred.
The terms that typically introduce
causality—such as caused by, reason for, led to, or product of—are still
used, but then the author often
goes on to discuss the reasons behind
the occurrence in depth.
Causality, when it appears in Reading Comprehension, is not normally
viewed as
inherently flawed reasoning, and LSAT authors usually
make an effort to explain the thinking behind their causal assertions.
Conditional reasoning is the broad name given to
logical relationships
composed of sufficient and necessary conditions.
Any conditional
relationship consists of
at least one sufficient condition and at least one
necessary condition.
A sufficient condition is an event or circumstance
whose occurrence indicates
that a necessary condition must also occur.
A necessary condition is an event or circumstance whose
occurrence is
required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
if a sufficient condition occurs, you automatically know that
the necessary condition also occurs.
If a necessary condition occurs, then it is possible but not
certain that the sufficient condition will occur.
Conditional reasoning is
the broad name given to logical relationships
composed of sufficient and necessary conditions.
Any conditional
relationship consists of
at least one sufficient condition and at least one
necessary condition.
A sufficient condition is
an event or circumstance
whose occurrence indicates that a necessary condition must also occur.
A necessary condition is an
event or circumstance whose occurrence is
required in order for a sufficient condition to occur.
if a sufficient condition occurs, you automatically know that
the necessary condition also occurs.
If a necessary condition occurs, then it is possible but not
certain that the sufficient condition will occur.
However, if a necessary condition fails to occur, you then
know that the
sufficient condition cannot occur either.
Conditional relationships in Reading Comprehension passages tend to
be
unobtrusive, usually occurring as a sideline point to a larger
argument.
conditionality is usually not the focus or Main
Point of a passage, but instead it is
a type of reasoning that occurs
while discussing or supporting other points.
When either of the two reasoning types are present, they are usually
discussed in
more expansive terms, and the causal or conditional argument
is broad and seldom based on single words or sentences.
causal or conditional reasoning assertions need not be limited to
a single
paragraph; entire passages can be built around a single causal or
conditional idea.
Traps of Similarities and Distinctions
This trap occurs when, in a continuous section of text, an author discusses
in detail items that have both similarities and differences. By comparing
and contrasting the items in close proximity, the test makers create a
greater likelihood for confusion (by comparison, if the discussion of the
concepts were separated into discrete sections, the information would be easier to keep clear).
If a list of comparisons and contrasts starts to get complicated, a simple note on
your scratch paper allows you to
keep that section in
perspective and move on to the rest of the passage.