Lombroso's historical theory Flashcards

1
Q

what form does Lombroso say humans take

A

atavistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

based on Darwins theory what are humans

A

genetic throwbacks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what can atavistic characteristics be markers for

A

identifying a criminal/crime they committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

examples of atavistic form (4)

A

extra fingers/toes, large ears, prominent jaw, darker skin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Lombroso study

A

post-mortems and living studies of criminal faces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what precise measurements did he make

A

skull and other physiological areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how many bodies did he study

A

+50,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

in a study of _ Italian criminals, _% had one trait and _% had 5

A

383, 21%, 43%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what did he later propose

A

atavistic form interacts with the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

name+explain the 3 types of criminal

A

born: atavistic
insane: mentally ill
criminaloids: predisposition triggered by environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

E-evidence by Lombroso - how many of the criminals he studied exhibited prognathism? how many had overdeveloped cheekbones?

A

92% exhibited prognathism

74% had overdeveloped cheekbones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

E-criticisms of Lombroso’s work - what didn’t he use? what effect does this have?

A

didn’t use control groups

lowers reliability and validity as can’t see if there is a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

E-criticisms of Lombroso’s work - what did Goring find against Lombroso? what did he agree with? why is his research better?

A

Goring found the criminals he studied didn’t have the same features but he did agree there was partly a biological component. his research had higher validity due to the use of a control group and comparisons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

E-alternative explanation - what else could cause criminality? who are 2 times more likely to face police action than who?

A

poverty could cause criminality. kids from deprived backgrounds are 2 times more likely to face police action than better off kids

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

E-practical applications - prior to his work what was crime/criminals seen as? what did he pave the way for?

A

prior to his work crime was seen as a choice, criminals were weak minded and could be deterred with harsh punishment. he paved the way for environment and biology removing free will and forces outside our control drive criminal behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

E-practical applications - what did he initiate the idea for?

A

offender profiling as they share characteristics so it was used to start to track offenders due to similar behaviour patterns

17
Q

E-alternative explanations - Eyesenck showed what

A

a more modern explanations that there are some personalities more prone to commit crimes but the environment must interact with genes

18
Q

E-effectiveness - led to what? increases what?

A

led to practical applications to identify criminals which increases the validity

19
Q

E-gender/racial biased explain

A

he never studied women so results can’t be generalised. he said women are less evolved than men so less likely to become criminals. he made criminals look like a black man with a low grade of intelligence