Differential association psychological explanation Flashcards
what did Edwin Sutherland suggest initially
criminal behaviour is explained through social learning
explain social learning theory of crime
people learn criminality through association with intimate personal groups
what can individuals learn
criminal attitudes or techniques
explain the different types of attitudes
attitudes can be pro-crime or anti-crime. if pro-crime attitudes outweighs anti-crime attitudes, the individual will go on to offend
how does learning vary
with frequency, intensity and duration of exposure to deviant and non-deviant norms and values
how is reoffending explained
p’s can be exposed to techniques in prison from other, more experienced criminals which they then practise on release
E1-changed views about origins of crime…
instead of crime being dispositional it is due to social experiences. lead to practical applications as we can manipulate learning environments but not genes
E1-Akers et al what did he do? to study what? found what?
Akers et al surveyed 2,500 male and female teens in the US to study drinking and drug behaviours. Found the most important influence was from peers and differential association, reinforcement and imitation accounted for 55% of alcohol use
E1-too unscientific…
hard to measure the number of pro-crime attitudes. difficult to know when the criminal behaviour will be learnt. therefore, the data is correlational with no cause and effect
E2-individual differences…
not everyone exposed to pro-criminal attitudes goes on to commit crimes. there is a danger of stereotyping individuals from crime-ridden backgrounds as unavoidably criminal. many choose not to offend despite the attitudes around them
E2-doesn’t account for all crimes…
such as rape/murder. confined to smaller crimes - smaller crimes account for a bigger % of crimes committed. e.g. in England and Wales in 2014 there were about 500 homicides but more than 400,000 burglaries
E2-doesn’t explain why young people commit the most crimes. Newburn found what % of crimes are committed by U21’s? why doesn’t it explain this issue?
Newburn found 40% of crimes are committed by people under the age of 21. It doesn’t explain this issue as epigenetics isn’t considered.