Lobbying Flashcards
an introduction to lobbying
- lobbying is paid activity in which special interests hire well-connected professional advocates, often lawyers, to argue for specific legislation in decision-making bodies such as the United States Congress.
- the activity of lobbying has been interpreted by court rulings as free speech and is therefore protected by the Constitution
- since the 1970s, lobbying activity has grown immensely in terms of the numbers of lobbyists and the size of lobbying budgets
- A report in ‘The Nation’ in 2014 suggested that while the number of 12,281 registered lobbyists was a decrease since 2002, lobbying activity was increasing and “going underground” as lobbyists use “increasingly sophisticated strategies” to obscure their activity.
- Analyst James Thurber estimated that the actual number of working lobbyists was close to 100,000 and the industry in $9 billion annually
methods and techniques of lobbying
- well-connected lobbyists work in Washington for years, know the issues, are highly skilled advocates, and have cultivated close connections with members of Congress, regulators, specialists, and others
- they understand strategy and have excellent communication skills
- lobbyists patiently cultivate networks of powerful people over the years, trying to build trust and maintain confidence and friendships
- when a client hires them to push a specific issue or agenda, they usually form coalitions to exert political pressure
- lobbyists often assist congresspersons with campaign finance by arranging fundraisers, assembling PACs, and seeking donations from other clients.
- many lobbyists become campaign treasurers and fundraisers for congresspersons
- congresspersons have to spend approximately a third of their working hours on fundraising activity
- according to Jack Abramoff, one of the best ways to “get what he wanted” was to offer a high-ranking congressional aide a high-paying job after they decided to leave public office. When such a promise of future employment was accepted, according to Abramoff, “we owned them”
what is the Revolving Door?
- is the movement of personnel between roles as legislators and regulators and the industries affected by the legislation and regulation.
- often congressman or aides to Congressmen move from a role in politics to a lobbying role for a private firm.
- this leads to accusations that this exploits contacts developed during a period in public office e.g. former congressman trying to influence former boss
example of revolving door regarding potential conflicts of interest
- investment banking firm Goldman Sachs was criticised in 2008 for engaging in ‘revolving door’ tactics.
- large number of former Goldman Sachs employees in the US government has been referred to as “Government Sachs”
- former treasury secretary Paulson was a former CEO of Goldman Sachs
- additional controversy attended the selection of former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Mark Patterson as chief of staff to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, despite Obama’s campaign promise that he would limit the influence of lobbyists in his administration.
- in February 2011, the Washington Examiner reported that Goldman Sachs was “the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008” and that its “CEO Lloyd Blankfein has visited the White House 10 times”
over a ten year period, approximately how many former congressional staffers had become fed era lobbyists?
- a 2011 estimate suggested 5,400
- and 400 law makers made a similar jump
- it is a “symbiotic relationship” in the sense that lobbying firms can exploit the “experience and connections gleaned from working inside the legislative process”, and lawmakers find a “read pool of experience talent”.
over a ten year period, approximately how many former lobbyists had taken jobs working for lawmakers?
- 605
- a study by London School of Economics found 1,113 lobbyists who had formerly worked in lawmakers offices
- the lobbying option is a way for staffers and lawmakers to “cash in on their experience”
- after the 1980s the lure of higher-paying lobbying jobs means many quit their posts as staffers and aides for congresspersons after a few years to “go downtown” (become a lobbyists)
give examples of a high-profile lawmakers that become lobbyists
- congressperson Dick Gephardt
- he represented a “working-class” district in Missouri for many years but after leaving Congress, he became a lobbyist.
- in 2007 he began his own lobbying firm called “Gephardt Government Affairs Group” and in 2010 it was earning close to $7 million in revenues with clients including Goldman Sachs, Boeing, Visa Inc., Ameren Corporation, and Waste Management Inc..
- Senators Robert Bennett and Byron Dorgan became lobbyists too
- Mississippi governor Haley Barbour became a lobbyist
- in 2010, former representative Billy Tauzin earned $11 million running the drug industry’s lobbying organisation called the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America
more examples of people becoming lobbyists
- a top aide to a Republican congressman from Arizona became a lobbyists just weeks after leavening his government job
- a former counsel to Democrats of the House Financial Services Committee left his government salary behind in january 2012 and months afterward he became a lobbyists for financial industry clients
some of the controversies revolving around lobbying
- Federal ethic rules are intended to limit lobbying by former senior officials within one year after they leave the government. Yet even after the ethics rules were revised in 2007 following a lobbying scandal, more than 1,650 congressional aides have registered to lobby within a year of leaving Capitol Hills, according to an analysis by The New York Times of data from LegiStorm
- the rules are particularly loose in the HoR where aides and lawmakers enjoy significant leeway in hopping from job to job- some aides resist pay raises, to keep their salaries just below the cutoff that would prompt lobbying restrictions
- former House aides can continue socialising with lawmakers, working on campaigns and attending committee hearings while representing private clients as a lobbyist.
concerns about the revolving door
- the effortless way former staff members avoid the one-year ban raises new concerns about the revolving door.
- Some say it fosters a clubby culture in Washington, where lawmakers and their aides might seek to protect Wall Street and other industries like health care from new rules and legislation
- the resulting widespread use of loopholes is disheartening to former lawmakers who tried, but failed, to enact more radical changes
2007 updated ethic rules from Congress
- updated in the wake of the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal, which included illegal influence between a lawmaker and a former aide
- it drafted tighter restrictions on the revolving door, arguing that a broader ban lasting two years might curb conflicts of interest in Washington
what is the percentage of lobbyists who were former government employees ?
- 2012: 44%
- 1998: 18%
(Sunlight Foundation study)
Doug Hampton case
- was a former aide to senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada, who pleaded guilty in 2012 to violating the one-year ban
- Michael P. Korton, the chief spokesman for the F.B.I said “Unless the violation is brought to our attention, [punishment] it is hard to enforce”
Mr. Tully and the Revolving Door
- one day after the leaving the House, Mr. Tully became an internal lobbyist for a Pennsylvania-based private mortgage insurer
- Yet in his new role as a lobbyists, he as free to communicate with the staff in his former boss’s office
- at one point, while attending a House hearing on housing legislation, he emailed on of Mr. Schweikert’s staff members, accordion to a Congressional aide with direct knowledge of the matter
Larry Lavender and the Revolving Door
- spun through the revolving door due to the blurring of lines between roles
- he spent five hears as chief of staff to the top Republican on the House Financial Services Committee at the time, Representative Spencer Bachus, a longtime friend from Alabama
- he earned $172,500 in his final full year on the Hill, fit squarely into the one-year ban’s allowances for campaigning and socialising