Analysing Pressure Groups Flashcards
Factors affecting pressure group success:
Organisation and leadership
- Groups with effective legislation and leadership and more likely to succeed than those that don’t
- e.g. Occupy Movement may have enjoyed media exposure, however lacking any formal structure or leadership meant it effectively fizzled out
Factors affecting pressure group success:
Wealth
- Financial resources enable pressure groups to lobby, engage in wider campaigning and have more effective publicity material.
- Business and trade groups are oftehn the wealthiest e.g. …
Factors affecting pressure group success:
Status of opposition
- Many pressure groups have an opposition arguing for the alternative viewpoint.
- In some cases the opposition is much stronger
- e.g. The NRA are much more powerful than pro-gun control groups such as…
Factors affecting pressure group success:
Membership size
- some argue that the number of members can help determine pressure group success.
- for instance AARP, with almost 40 million members can claim to represent a very significant portion of the US population
Factors affecting pressure group success:
Achievability of group goal
- some more ideological pressure groups may have goals which are unrealistic or unachievable
- advocacy groups, and those seeking to represent one section of society’s interests, may have goals that are easier to attain, and the groups themselves may be more pragmatic
are pressure groups democratic? (short answer)
- pressure groups allow a large proportion of the population to participate in the political process between elections.
- they pressure all three branches of government - the executive, legislature and judiciary - to convince them to follow their viewpoint and take action on particular causes that are important to the group
- critics say that pressure groups aren’t always fully democratic and sometimes they may even encroach and disrupt the normal democratic process of government in the USA
Ways pressure groups are undemocratic:
hiring lobbyists
- pressure groups with a medium to high level of influence and financial ability frequently hire professional lobbyists to work on their behalf, promoting recognition of the group and their ideas
- many lobbyists, however, are former Congress members with internal knowledge of the workings of the US government (revolving door)
- this gives an unfair advance over other groups who may not have such resources at their disposal
Ways pressure groups are undemocratic:
self interest over society
- pressure groups are nearly always interested in the plight of their own membership feather than the society at large
- this results in special interest groups fighting for recognition and implementation of their ideas without stopping to think about its wider impact
- NAACP follow this pattern
- can also lead to particular sections of society being stereotyped for their apparently identical viewpoint on issues while in real life, viewpoints are varied
Ways pressure groups are undemocratic:
buying of political influence
- professional lobbying can also lead to the “buying of political influence” in which pressure groups spend un-proportionally large amounts of money on lobbying activities, therefore “buying” influence on Congress members who may be sympathetic to their cause.
- some cases, this can lead to legislation being “helped” out by pressure group members who suggest clauses and amendments which will help their business activities
Ways pressure groups are undemocratic:
“iron-triangle”
- term used to describe the relationship between a pressure group, a congressional committee and a government department
- usually these relationships are strong, and can lead to favourable policies for the pressure group membership
- just like lobbyists, iron-triangel can “buy influence” on committees and departments, and this is generally seen as a bad thing, as it does not allow smaller groups the same level of recognition and access to influential politicians
Ways pressure groups are undemocratic:
unequal
- unequal in terms of size, membership and financing
- groups like the NRA have millions of members and very high levels of finance ability, which they use for their lobbying activities regarding gun laws.
- groups like NARAL or the Brady Campaign are much smaller, and only have a few hundred or thousand members, and have limited finances to pursue their agendas
- ## unequal competition is seen as “the power of the rich over the poor”
Ways pressure groups are democratic:
impact on the government policy
- pressure groups have made a large impact on the government in a number of policy areas
- e.g. the NAACP won civil rights for African-Americans with its backing of the 1954 Brown v Board of Education case at the US Supreme Court
- the NAACP also helped finance many civil rights cases where the prosecutor did not possess enough financial ability to fight the case
- in the more recent case of the 2003 Grutter v Bollinger Supreme Court judgement, the NAACP helped the University of Michigan by filing an amicus curiae supporting is affirmative action programme
- the university won the case
Ways pressure groups are democratic:
representing groups that aren’t heard
- groups like Sierra Club, Wilderness Society and National Wildlife Federation have campaigned for greater environmental protection
- the National organisation for Women campaigned for an equal rights amendment to the US Constitution in the 1970s and 1980s
- they’re protecting interests and ensuring a free democracy by lessening the chances of a government only listening to the view of influential people
Ways pressure groups are democratic:
offer advice to government departments and committees
- offer valuable advice to committees and government departments on certain issues on which they have expertise
- e.g. NAACP advises politicians on racial and African-AMerican issues
- the NRA does the same with gun legislation and education
- this also means pressure groups can use it to their advantage by giving advice which implies compliance with their viewpoints
- p.33 amicus curiae???
Ways pressure groups are democratic:
uphold Constitutional rights
- by influencing all three branches of government using the many different access points available, it can also be argued that pressure groups make sure that the government never encroach on First Amendment rights because the points of access are continually used and known about
- interest groups play a vital role in upholding Constitutional Rights and preventing the growth of arbitrary government