Lifespan Development School And Family Influences Flashcards
Predictors of Divorce
The risk for divorce has been linked to several factors including a couple’s communication pattern. Based on the results of their longitudinal study of couples who divorced over a 14-year period, Gottman and Levenson (2002) concluded that two patterns are predictive of divorce: The emotionally volatile (attack-defend) pattern is characterized by frequent arguments that are followed by making-up and is associated with divorce early in the marriage.
Gottman and Levenson (2002) concluded that two patterns are predictive of divorce:
emotionally volatile (attack-defend) pattern is characterized by frequent arguments that are followed by making-up and is associated with divorce early in the marriage. Couples exhibiting this pattern engage in escalating conflicts that include criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling
emotionally inexpressive (avoidant) pattern is characterized by the avoidance of conflict and is associated with divorce later in the marriage. Couples exhibiting this pattern avoid self-disclosure and expressing their emotions.
criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling
Gottman and Levenson refer to these four behaviors as
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse and found that contempt is the single best predictor of divorce
Researchers have also identified a number of sociodemographic factors that are associated with an increased risk for divorce (Carr, 2006; Rodrigues, Hall, & Fincham, 2006).
sociodemographic factors, age at time of marriage is one of the best predictors of divorce, with the risk for divorce decreasing as the age at time of marriage increases. The studies have also found that the risk for divorce is greater among members of lower socioeconomic groups, couples that had a child before marriage, and individuals who have had a previous marriage
Researchers have also identified a number of individual characteristics that are associated with an increased risk for divorce (Carr, 2006; Rodrigues, Hall, & Fincham, 2006).
individual characteristics, an elevated risk for divorce has been linked to psychopathology and certain personality traits: There’s evidence that individuals who report having one or more psychiatric disorders before or during marriage are more likely to divorce than are those without psychopathology. Of the personality traits that have been studied, high levels of neuroticism have been identified as being most consistently linked to a high risk for divorce.
Consequences of Divorce on Parents and Children
- Effects on Parents
Parents often exhibit “a diminished capacity to parent” that continues for up to two years after the divorce and involves reduced sensitivity to the children and a preoccupation with problems related to the divorce (Wallerstein & Blakeslee, 1989). Custodial mothers may show less affection toward their children (especially sons) and be less consistent and more authoritarian in their discipline, while noncustodial fathers often become more indulgent and permissive.
- Effects on Children
The consequences of divorce for children are affected by the child’s age, gender, and other factors. With regard to age, preschool children often have the most negative outcomes, especially in the short-run (Zill, Morrison, & Corio, 1993). However, long-term consequences may be worse for children who are older at the time of divorce. Wallerstein (1984) found that, 10 years after the divorce, children who were preschoolers when their parents divorced had few memories of the period surrounding the divorce, but those who were older when their parents divorced had painful memories and concerns about their own ability to have a successful marriage.
Regards to children’s gender and divorce
early studies found that boys experienced more negative short- and long-term effects than girls. However, subsequent studies found that girls also experience negative effects immediately after the divorce but are more likely to exhibit internalizing behaviors that aren’t as obvious. In addition, girls may experience a “sleeper effect”: Girls who were in preschool or elementary school when their parents divorced may experience few problems initially but become noncompliant and have low self-esteem and emotional problems as adolescents and become pregnant before marriage, marry young, and worry excessively about abandonment and betrayal in romantic relationship (Chase-Lansdale & Hetherington, 1990; Hetherington, 1988)
Important factor for child outcomes is
marital conflict, which has been found to have a negative impact on children whether their parents are divorced or together (Amato, 2006). In fact, there’s evidence that children from highly conflictual intact families are more poorly adjusted than children from low-conflict divorced families (Block, Block, & Gjerde, 1988.) Socioeconomic status following divorce also affects children’s outcomes. Family socioeconomic status often decreases following divorce, especially for custodial mothers, and financial hardship has been linked to an increased risk for academic and social problems and other negative outcomes for children (e.g., Amato & Keith, 1991). Finally, contrary to what might be expected, there’s evidence that the frequency of children’s contact with their nonresident fathers has less impact on children’s outcomes than other factors do, including the father’s payment of child support, the closeness of the father-child relationship, and the father’s reliance on an authoritative parenting style (Amato & Gilbreth, 1999).
Stepfamilies: Early studies found
Which results are significant?
children living with a biological parent and stepparent tend to have worse outcomes than those living with both biological parents, but they’ve also found that this difference tends to be small (Amato & Keith, 1991). In addition, longitudinal studies suggest that the adjustment of children in simple stepfamilies (families with a stepfather or stepmother and children from only one parent) improves over time and that their adjustment is better than the adjustment of children in blended stepfamilies (families that include children from both previous marriages) and children in intact conflicted families (Hetherington, 2006). However, there’s evidence that negative outcomes are reduced when the biological parent and stepparent both have an authoritative parenting style and the stepparent is supportive of the biological parent’s decisions and develops a relationship with his/her stepchild before attempting to actively discipline the child (Bray, 1999; Hetherington, Bridges, & Insabella, 1998).
Research investigating gender and age differences in adjustment to a stepparent has confirmed
At what age do children have the hardest time in dealing in adjusting to stepparents?
Boys and girls both experience difficulties but that girls tend to have more problems adjusting to both stepfathers and stepmothers.
Girls living with stepfathers are more likely to avoid and be hostile toward their stepfathers and to be at increased risk for academic and behavioral problems. In contrast, boys living with stepfathers often benefit from having stepfathers in terms of self-concept, academic achievement, and adjustment, especially when they perceive their relationships with stepfathers as being close and supportive.
Girls living with stepmothers have even more problems than those living with stepfathers and tend to view stepmothers as threats to their relationships with their fathers and mothers. However, boys are more likely to view stepmothers as an additional source of support. With regard to age, pre- and early adolescence (approximately 9 to 15 years of age) are associated with the most problems (Hetherington, 1989). Apparently, adjustment to a new stepparent is most difficult for children and adolescents in this age group because they are also dealing with issues related to identity and sexuality and other normal problems of adolescence (e.g., Ashford, LeCroy, & Williams, 2018; Hetherington, 1993).
Premarital Cohabitation and Divorce
Initial studies on the effects of premarital cohabitation on the risk for divorce found that married couples who cohabitated before marriage had higher rates of divorce than those who did not cohabit (e.g., Thomson & Colella, 1992). Subsequent studies in the early 2000’s found that premarital cohabitation was no longer associated with higher rates of divorce but, more recent research suggests that the relationship between cohabitation and divorce is complex: Based on their analysis of the National Surveys of Family Growth (NSFG), Rosenfeld and Roesler (2019) concluded that living together before marriage is associated with a decreased likelihood for divorce during the first year of marriage but with an increased likelihood for divorce in subsequent years.
Marital Status has been found to be related
mortality rates and life satisfaction. (a) Longitudinal studies have consistently found that married men and women have lower mortality rates than do divorced, widowed, or never married men and women.
Data collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (Curtin & Tejada-Vera, 2019) indicate that, in 2017,
age-adjusted death rates for persons 25 years of age and older were lowest for married men and women, followed in order by divorced, never married, and widowed men and women. In addition, the mortality rates for all four marital statuses were lower for women than for men. (b) Most studies have found that married individuals report the highest levels of life satisfaction with some studies indicating that cohabiting individuals have similar or slightly lower levels and that previously married individuals have the lowest levels. As an example, Greenstein’s (2016) cross-national study found that married and cohabiting men had the same and the highest average scores on a measure of life satisfaction followed by married women and that divorced and separated men and women had the lowest average scores. There is some disagreement about the nature of the link between marriage and life satisfaction. For instance, rather than concluding that marriage increases happiness, Lucas and colleagues (2003) propose that people who get married and maintain their marriage were happier before they married than people who never married or got married and eventually divorced.
Transition to Parenthood and Relationship Quality
The research has found that, for most couples, the transition to parenthood is accompanied by a decline in relationship satisfaction and an increase in relationship conflict (e.g., Kuther, 2017). However, the effects vary
Ceballo, Lansford, Abey, and Stewart (2004) compared this transition for biological and adoptive parents and found
becoming parents through adoption was associated with better outcomes: Adoptive parents in their study reported less marital and parenting stress, a smaller decrease in marital satisfaction, and a more stable pattern of relationship quality. One factor that lessens the stress associated with the transition to parenthood is the availability of support from family members and friends. Another factor is the degree to which the parents share parenting responsibilities, with greater declines in relationship satisfaction (especially for women) being associated with greater disparities in responsibilities.
Adopted vs. Biological Children
Research has found that, compared to parents of biological children, parents of adopted children tend to be better educated and have higher family incomes but that adopted children are at greater risk for psychological, behavioral, and academic problems despite these advantages
Zill and Wilcox (2018) analyzed data from the U. S. Department of Education’s 2016 National Household Education Survey and reported the following: Compared to children living with biological parents, adopted children were more likely
a) to have had their parents contacted by the school for schoolwork and classroom behavior problems and (b) to have physical and psychological health conditions, with ADHD being most common followed by, in order, specific learning disability, speech impairment, and developmental delay. Also, in a meta-analysis of studies comparing international adoptees, domestic adoptees, and nonadopted peers, Juffer and van IJzendoorn (2005) found that international and domestic adoptees had higher rates of internalizing and externalizing problems than nonadoptees had. However, contrary to their prediction, international adoptees had lower rates of internalizing and externalizing problems than domestic adoptees had and were referred less often to mental health services. Zill and Wilcox (2018) conclude that poorer outcomes for adopted children are likely due to the children’s experiences prior to adoption. For example, the pre-adoption experiences of adopted children may have included exposure to multiple risk factors including birth complications, early malnutrition, neglect, and/or abuse (IJzendoorn, Juffer, & Klein Poelhuis, 2005).
What is are Helicopter Parents
The term “helicopter parents” is used to describe parents “who overtly infuse themselves into every aspect of the child’s life, not allowing the child to deal, cope, grow, or mature properly on his or her own” (Parents, Overinvolved, 2016, p. 809). These parents are overinvolved in their children’s activities, often make decisions for their children, and intervene to prevent their children from failing. This type of parenting is more benevolent than Baumrind’s authoritarian parenting style but is similar to that style in terms of level of control and negative outcomes (Bayat, 2020).
Outcomes associated with helicopter parenting include
high levels of stress and anxiety, increased sense of entitlement, low levels of autonomy and emotional and behavioral self-regulation, and decreased academic motivation and achievement (e.g., Perry et al., 2018; Schiffrin & Liss, 2017; Segrin, Woszidlo, Givertz, & Montgomery, 2013).
Several studies have focused on the effects of helicopter parenting on the adjustment of emerging adults
Cook (2020) found that, for college students, helicopter parenting was associated with increased symptoms of depression, increased substance use problems, and decreased competence in friendships and romantic relationships. In addition, Luebbe and his colleagues (2016) found a link between helicopter parenting and poor emotional functioning, decision-making, and academic functioning in their sample of individuals, ages 17 to 25.