Life events Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 3 stages of response to a stressor according to Selye General Adaptation Syndrome (1936)?

A

Alarm – appraisal of threat and physiological fight/flight response
Resistance –bodily defences weakened by maintenance of threat and physiological responses
Exhaustion – bodily defences (various) breakdown leading to illness susceptibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of stressors

A

Chronic difficulties

Acute life events
- Actual change
- Decision by S to do something
- News
- Forecast
- Revelation (other to S)
- Disclosure (S to other)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do we measure stressors?

A

Measure Es and Ds
Cover wide range of different experiences
Define what and who counts (e.g who is a ‘close’ relative?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What can stressors be defined as?

A

Change (Selye)?
Threat?
Specific types of ‘threat’
Loss
Danger
Goal Frustration

(defined by person or researcher)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do we measure stressors?

A

Simple respondent questionnaire
Above plus ‘weights’

Investigator rated interview
Categories e.g ‘entrance’ and ‘exit’ events
Contextual ratings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the challenges?

A
  1. Reverse causality (e.g. depression->marital difficulty (stressor) -> depression (outcome) *goes back to depression in beginning
  2. Recall bias & effort after meaning (e.g. stressor->outcome -> recall)
  3. confounding (e.g. life event and other factor -> disorder)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some examples of checklist self report measures?

A

Schedule of Recent Experiences (SRE, Hawkins et al 1957)
- Simple list yes/no

Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS; Holmes &Rahe 1967)
- Scaled version of SRE
- Based on extent of life change for each event
- Summed score

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the pros of checklist measures?

A

Easy to administer
*Cheap
*Limited or no training required
*Low respondent and researcher burden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the cons?

A

Is it change or something else that constitutes stress?
Limited number of possible events
Other life circumstances mean that a similar named event can affect people in different ways so a disadvantage not to have access to context
Cannot take account of independence
May not take dates into account so cannot take temporal relationships between events and health outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 3 major weaknesses of checklists?

A

Independence
Some events may be the result rather than the cause of illness
Can you think of an example?

Context
The impact of an event may be influenced by wider circumstances in which it occurs.
Eg. A birth

Biased Appraisal
Effort after Meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are some interview based measures of life events?

A

-Life Events and Difficulties Schedule (LEDS; Brown & Harris, 1978)Gold Standard comprehensive. But it’s a lengthy interview and extensive training is required.

-Interview for Recent Life Events (IRLE; Paykel, 1983, 1997) Shorter and easier to administer than LEDS. Also includes measures of independence and objective threat ratings. But doesn’t have the capacity to probe as much.

-Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Interview Life Events Scale (PERI-LE; Dohrenwendet al., 1978) Structured and briefer than measures above. Latest version now includes ratings for independence & threat.

-List of Threatening Experiences (LTE; Brugha& Cragg, 1990) Can be used as both an interview and self-report checklist. Too brief to provide comprehensive coverage (only 12 events) but ideal for larger studies

  • McQuaid et al. (1992) – Only 38.5% of life events reported on self-report checklist correspond with events elicited by interview
  • Duggal et al. (2000) – Self-report measure captured only 32% of severe events and 36% of major difficulties identified by LEDS

Lewinsohn et al. (2003) – Overall % of checklist events also rated by LEDS was <50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is LEDS interview?

A

Questions cover actual occurrences but also transfers of information ( revelations, disclosures etc)
As happen to S or pre defined close others
Collect detailed context for each E or D
Everything dated including onset of DV and questions go back and forth between dates and onsets to improve accuracy of dating

Contextual Rating of Threat
Short term
Long term
Rated by researcher with reference to extensive dictionary and consensus meeting
Ordinal Scales eg for Es:
Marked, moderate, Some, Little/none
Separate self-report rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the pros and cons of LEDS

A

Pros
Precision in definition of what Es and Ds to include
Covers very wide range of experiences
Strategies to reduce bias of self report
Contextual measurement of meaning

Cons
Costs of implementation
Need for training
Respondent burden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was found about depression?

A

If properly enquired about, the majority of new onsets of depression are preceded by severely threatening life events
But
Only about 1:25 of all those experiencing one of these events in any year will go on to develop depression
Therefore
There must be something else that makes people specially vulnerable to the impact of severe events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did the Islington study find? (Brown et al 1986)

A

400 working class mothers (1/4 single mothers) did an interview, had vulnerability of either childhood, self esteem or quality of relationships - 12 months = 126 women free of depression as baseline and who had severe event in the follow up year

events and difficulties included- psych disorder, crisis support, coping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was found about psychosis?

A

Specific life events?

Intrusiveness defined as interference or attempted control of an individuals personal boundaries (eg being assaulted or arrested)
People with Sz up to 20x intrusive events compared to controls (Harris 1987)
Exposure in previous 3 months increased odds of disorder x 17 times (Raune et al2010)

17
Q

What was found with FND?

A

43 pts with motor FND (motor paralysis) compared with 28 with depression and 28 healthy controls
LEDS measures including rating of ‘escape’
Escape : extent to which the impact of an event might be ameliorated by onset of neurological symptoms such as muscle weakness

18
Q

Life events have been consistently associated with

A

a variety of mental health problems
BUT
only a number of factors that contribute to development of psychiatric disorders

19
Q

What is the gold standard to assess the impact of life events?

A

LEDS allow for variety of contextual info to be collected

(although interview ideal not always possible for larger studies; researchers must weigh up breadth and depth and be practical about what is possible)