Lesson 6 Flashcards
6.1.1 Explain the premise of EMH
Efficient market hypothesis is an investment theory that states it is impossible to beat the market because stock market efficiency causes existing share prices to always incorporate and reflect all relevant information.
Believers argue it is pointless to search for undervalued stocks or try to predict trends in the market through either fundamental or technical analysis
6.1.2 Describe the assumption about available information that underpins EMH
EMH assumes that the market is efficient with respect to some information, if that information is not useful in earning a positive access return.
The emphasis is on with respect to some particular information. The question of whether in market is efficient with meaning for only relative to some type of information.
Three types of information sets are of interest in the context of market efficiency and they are nested. That is the information in the strong information set includes the information in the semi strong information set which in turn includes the information in the weak information set.
6.1.3.a Discuss the weak form of EMH in terms of information sets
The weak form of EMH asserts that the stock prices already affect all information that could be driving by examining market trading data, such as the history of past prices and trading volume. Past stock price data are publicly available and virtually cost us to obtain.
The week form hypothesis hold that if such data ever conveyed reliable signals about future performance, all investors would have learned already to exploit the signals. Ultimately the signals lose their value as they become widely known
6.1.3.b Discuss the semistrong form of EMH in terms of information sets
The semi strong form of EMH asserts that all publicly available information regarding the prospects of a company must be reflected already in the stock price.
Such information includes, in addition to past price history, fundamental data on the company’s product, quality of management, balance sheet composition, earnings forecasts and accounting practices.
The premise is the same as that for the weak form if any investor has access to such information from publicly available sources one would expect it to be reflected in stock prices
6.1.3.c Discuss the strong form of EMH in terms of information sets
The strong form of EMH asserts that stock prices reflect all information relevant to the company, including information available only to company insiders.
This version of the hypothesis is quite extreme. If you would argue the notion that corporate officers have access to pertinent information long enough before public release to enable them to profit from trading on that information.
These insiders, their relatives and any associates a trade on information supplied by insiders are considered in violation of the law. However defining insider trading is not always easy and stock analysts are in the business of uncovering information not already widely known to market participants
6.1.4 Describe the two key implications of EMH for investors
- It implies that security prices properly reflect whatever information is available to investors. The driving force behind market efficiency are simply competition and profit
- The second is implication is that active traders will find it difficult to outperform passive strategies.
Out performance of passive strategies requires differential or divergent insight by traders which is very hard to come by in a highly competitive financial market. Investors constantly try to identify superior performing investments this constant appraisal and subsequent trading activity asked to ensure the prices never differ much from their efficient market price.
6.1.5 Describe the essence of the conflict between EMH and technical analysis
The essence of the conflict between EMH a technical analysis lies in both the weak form and semi strong forms of EMH.
EMH follows from the idea that rational, profit seeking investors will act on new information so quickly that prices will nearly always reflect on publicly available information.
Technical analysis, on the other hand asserts the existence of long lived trends that play out slowly and predictably. Such patterns if they exist would violate the EMH notion of essentially unpredictable stock price changes
6.2.1 Explain the significance of financial market anomalies for investors
Financial market anomalies are patterns of security returns that seem to contradict EMH; they are types of predictable continuing trends and security returns that ought to be impossible in an efficient market.
Several explanations have been offered but many anomalies have no conclusive explanations. Some occur once and then disappear while others are consistently observed.
An anomalies are generally small and that they do not involve many dollars relative the size of the market and they tend to disappear when discovered. Anomalies are not easily used as a basis for trading strategy
6.2.2.a Describe the market anomaly known as the P/E effect
The price to earnings ratio is widely followed by investors and used in stock a valuations. Because it is publicly available information according to EMH it should already be reflected in stock price.
However purchasing stocks with relatively low price to earnings ratio’s appears to be potentially profitable as an investment strategy. Researchers have found that on average returns of stocks with low price to earning ratios are higher than stocks with high priced earning ratios even after adjusting for risk
6.2.2.b Describe the market anomaly known as the size or small firm effect
This effect is measured using annual historical performance of 10 portfolios that are created by dividing the New York Stock Exchange stocks into 10 portfolios according to market capitalization
Researchers have found that average annual returns are consistently higher on small market capitalization firms. The small firm fact is logical in the sense that affirms economic growth is ultimately the driving force behind the stocks performance the premise is that smaller firms of higher rate of growth opportunities than larger companies
6.2.2.c Describe the market anomaly known as the neglected firm effect
This effect explains the tenancy for certain lesser known companies to perform better known companies.
It is measured by looking at the annual performance of portfolios created by dividing companies into three portfolios [highly researched, moderately researched and neglected] based on the number of large institutions holding the stock.
Because small companies tend to be neglected by investors information about such companies is less available which makes them risk your investments that command higher returns and presumably investors do not purchase generic stocks without the prospect of greater returns.
6.2.2.d Describe the market anomaly known as the liquidity effect
Because small and less analyzed stocks are as a rule less liquid the liquidity effect might be a partial explanation of the abnormal returns since investors will demand a premium to invest in less liquid stocks.
These stocks may also have higher trading costs so exploring the liquidity affect can be more difficult than it would appear because trading cost on small stocks can easily offset any appeared abnormal profit opportunity
6.2.3.a Describe the market anomaly known as the low price book ratio
The low price book ratio. Research shows that part a powerful predictor of returns is the ratio of market value of a stock with book value.
Stocks with below average price book ratios tend to out perform the market. Numerous test portfolios have shown that buying a collection of stocks with low price book ratios can deliver market meeting performance.
This is normally makes sense to a point, and that you unusually cheap stocks should attract buyers attention and as they are purchased the price would adjust
6.2.3.b Describe the market anomaly known as the post earnings announcement price drift
The post earnings announcement price drift is the tendency for stocks cumulative abnormal returns to drift for several weeks following a positive earnings announcement.
Well EMH suggests the stock prices should respond very quickly to unanticipated news or earning surprises research shows that it take a days or longer for the market price to just fully resulting in a sustained period of abnormal returns.
Research shows that buying stocks after a positive earning surprise is a profitable investment strategy
6.2.3.c Describe the market anomaly known as the January effect
The premise of the January effect is that stocks that under performed in the fourth quarter of the previous year tend to outperform the markets in January.
This is normally is perhaps the most rational as investors tend to sell under performing stocks just before year end to use their losses to offset capital gains taxes. This separates the motivation to sell from the fundamentals of the stock about you.
Intern investors with Levi under performing stocks in the fourth quarter waiting until January to get avoid getting caught up in this tax driven selling behaviour this leads to access the link of pressure before January 1 and access buying pressure after January 1
6.2.3.d Describe the market anomaly known as the reverse effect
Some research suggests that stocks at either end of the performance spectrum over periods of time (a year) do tend to reverse course in the following period
Stocks that tend to do very well will reverse and under perform the market for as long as a year. By the same token stocks that were under performing become outperforming for an extended period of time
This reversal occurs whether or not company financial statements justify the price movements. This is normally is logical and maybe due in part to invest your psychology driving behavior. Investors expect high performers to fall in neglected stocks to get discovered and rise, if investors habitually buy and sell in this pattern, it becomes a self-fulfilling anomaly
6.3.1 Explain the connection between the premise under pinning behavioral finance and findings in the anomalies literature. Give two broad categories for irrationalities
Well conventional financial theories presume that investors are rational, behavioral finance presumed they are not. Behavioral finance focusses on systemic irrationality is that characterize investor decision making.
A number of economist interpret findings of anomalies literature as consistent with several irrationality’s or behavioral shortcomings. These rationality’s fall into two broad categories
- Investors do not always process information correctly and therefore infer incorrect probability distribution’s about future rates of return
- Even given a probability distribution of returns investors often make inconsistent or systemically sub optimal decisions
6.3.2.a Explain how forecasting error/memory bias can lead investors to misestimate the true probabilities of possible events or associated rates of returns
Research suggests that people give too much weight to recent experience as a post to prior experience with making forecast tending to make forecast that are too extreme
6.3.2.b Explain how overconfidence biased can lead investors to misestimate the true probabilities of possible events or associated rates of return
Overconfidence bias means that people tend to over estimate their abilities and the position of their beliefs or forecast.
Overconfidence biased may be responsible for the prevalence of active management which is itself a new normally do proponents of EMH. The dominance of active management, despite research that suggest under performance of active management strategies, is consistent with a tendency to estimate ability to highly
6.3.2.c Explain how conservatism bias can lead investors to misestimate the true probabilities of possible events or associated rates of return
I conservatism bias means that people are too slow, too conservative, in updating their beliefs in response to the new information. For example investors might initially under react to use a better company with the result being that prices will fully reflect new information only gradually