Lesson 5 Flashcards
5.1.1 Assume you’re considering to assess for your portfolio:
A risk free T-bill and a stock the expected return is 3% on the T-Bill and 10% on the stock.
The standard deviation of the stock is 20%.
Compare the expected return and risk as measured by standard deviation if you put 100% of your portfolio in the stock as compared to the T-Bill
The T-bill will have a return of 3% and or risk of 0%
Investing 100% in the stock would give you an expected return on your portfolio of 10% in a portfolio risk of 20%
5.1.2 Assume you’re considering to assess for your portfolio a risk free T Bill and a stock.
The expected return is 3% on the T-Bill and 10% on the stock.
The standard deviation of the stock is 20%.
Calculate the expected return and standard deviation of your complete portfolio if you allocate 25% of the table and 75% to the stock and explain the trade off
The expected return using to complete portfolio formula will be 8.25%. The standard deviation of the complete portfolio will be 15%.
As expected both the expected return and the standard deviation or higher than those of the T-Bills alone in lower than those for the stock alone
5.1.3 Your risky portfolio has an expected return of 10% and a standard deviation of 20%. The risk-free rate is 6%. Calculate expected return on your complete portfolio if you:
A) allocate 80% to the risky portfolio
B) allocate 60% to the risky portfolio
Explain the trade off in your expected return to the two scenarios
A) 9.2%
B) 8.4%
Shifting a greater proportion to the lower in return risk free assets reduces the return on the complete portfolio but also reduces the risk NBC
5.1.4 I assume you’re considering to assess for your portfolio: a risk free T-Bill and a stock.
The expected return is 3% on the T-Bill and 10% on the stock. The standard deviation of the stock is 20% you have two options:
- Allocate 80% of the risky portfolio
- Allocate 60% of the receipt portfolio
Explain the the risk trade off between the two scenarios
The standard deviation of the complete portfolio is the standard deviation of the risky asset multiplied by the weight of the risk asset in that portfolio.
- The standard deviation of the 80% allocation is 16%
- The standard deviation of the 60% allocation is 12%
Shifting in greater proportion to the lower return risk-free asset reduces the risk; however it will also reduce the expected return
5.2.1 Define capital allocation line (CAL) and explain its purpose
The capital allocation line shows the expected return and the risk as measured by standard deviation of every single combination of risk-free and risky assets available to an investor for a capital allocation.
Expected returns are plotted on the Y axis and standard deviation is on the X axis. The capital allocation line aids investors and choosing how much to invest in a risk-free assets and one or more risky assets.
The slope measures the trade off between the risk and return and equals the increase in the expected return of the chosen portfolio per unit of additional standard deviation. A steeper slope means that investors receive higher expected returns in exchange for taking on more risk
5.2.2 Interpret the following capital allocation line
a) risk free rate
b) what is the slope
- This CAL is plotted assuming the risk-free rate is 4% and it’s standard deviation is 0
- The riskiest asset on the CAL has an expected return of just under 12% and the standard deviation of 15%
- The difference between the risk-free rate and any given standard deviation along the line is the risk premium expected by the investor for that risk return combination
- Increasing the fraction of the overall portfolio invested in risky assets increases expected return and standard deviation
- The slope of the CAL is known as the reward to variability ratio or the sharpe ratio
- The CAL illustrates the investment opportunities set available to investors
5.2.3 Explain how individual differences in risk aversion affect capital allocation choices when investors are choosing from an identical investment opportunity set as depicted by the CAL
The CAL provides a graph of all feasible risk return combinations available for capital allocation.
The investor can use the EAL to choose one of the more combination trading off risk and return. The investors choice will depend on their level of risk aversion
5.3.1 Assume your risk aversion index is three, the rate of return on your risk free portfolio is 7%. The rate of return on your risky portfolio is 15% and it’s standard deviation is 22%. Determine your optimal portfolio of risky and risk-free assets
You would choose the allocation to the risky asset that maximizes your utility function. Giving your risk aversion index and return characteristics of your options your optimal portfolio is 55% risky assets and 45% risk free assets
5.3.2 Assume your risk aversion index is three, the rate of return on your risk-free portfolio is 7% the rate of return on your whiskey portfolio is 15% it’s standard deviation is 22% and your optimal portfolio allocation to risky asset is 55%.
Calculate the expected return and identify standard deviation on your optimal portfolio
The standard deviation is 12.1% and the expected return is 11.4%
5.3.3 Assume your risk aversion index is 6, the rate of return on your risk free portfolio is 7%, the rate of return on your risky portfolio is 15% and it’s standard deviation is 22%. Determine the change in your optimal portfolio and risky and risk-free assets
Your optimal portfolio is a combination of 27.5% risky assets and 72.5% risk free assets
5.3.4
Information that can be interpreted from this craft includes:
- Each curve connects investment portfolios with the same utility level
- Utility levels are affected by the investors index of risk aversion
- Portfolios on steeper indifference curves offer a higher expected return for any given squabble
- Higher in difference curves correspond to higher levels of utility
- Investors with a high risk tolerance require the same expected return incentive to except more portfolio risk
- As risk aversion increases investors demand more return for each unit of increase in risk
- When risk increases investors demand more return based on the utility function there by keeping the level of utility the same
5.4.1 Briefly describe a passive investment strategy
With a passive investment strategy, there is no direct or indirect security analysis. Investors do not require information on any individual stock or group of stocks. A passive strategy involves investing in to portfolios, virtually risk-free short term T-bills and I diversified portfolio frisky assets
5.4.2 Explain the relationship between the capital market line [CML] and passive investment strategy
CML is the capital allocation line that represents a passive investment strategy comprising virtually risk free, short term T-bills and a fund of common stock that mimics a broad market index
5.4.3 Compare the cost and benefits of an active investment strategy with a passive investment strategy
Constructing an active portfolio is more expensive than constructing a passive one
After portfolios require an investment of time and money by the individual investor to acquire the information needed to generate an optimal after portfolio or delegating that task to a professional. Either way there’s a cost.
Passive strategies also reflect the free rider benefit. If we assume there are many active knowledgeable investors quickly bidding on prices of undervalued assets and bidding down overvalued assets we can conclude that most stocks are fairly priced. Therefore a well diversified portfolio of common stock may be reasonably fair to buy
5.5.1 Define diversification and briefly Outline its role in portfolio construction
Diversification is the process of spreading funds available for investment across assets.
Diversification across many assets will eliminate some of the risk associated with individual assets with the idea that good performance will outweigh poor performance between assets
In constructing a portfolio investors to determine how much risk they are willing to take on and then they can allocate or diversify their portfolios according to the results of that decision