Lesson 12 Flashcards

1
Q

strong, esthetic post and core restoration can be fabricated from strong zirconia with CAD/CAM technology

A

CAD/CAM ZIRCONIA POST AND CORE RESTORATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

replaces the missing coronal tooth structure, in combination with the remaining coronal tissue

A

CORE FABRICATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

→ shaped in resin or wax
→ cast directly onto prefabricated post

A

CORE FABRICATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

make a core from plastic restorative material (amalgam,
composite resin, or glass ionomer)

A

CORE FABRICATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

→ maximum tooth structure can be conserved because undercuts do not need to be removed
→ treatment requires one fewer patient visit

A

ADVANTAGES of PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

→ there are fewer laboratory procedures
→ testing has generally revealed good resistance to fatigue
testing and good strength characteristics, possibly because of the good adaptation to tooth structure

A

ADVANTAGES of PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

long-term success may be affected by corrosion of amalgam cores, the low strength of glass ionomer or the continued polymerization and high thermal expansion coefficients of composite resin cores

A

DISADVANTAGES of PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

microleakage with temperature fluctuations (thermocycling) is greater under composite resin and amalgam cores than under conventional crown preparations (however, the extent of leakage under cast cores has yet to be determined)

A

DISADVANTAGES of PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

difficulty may be encountered with certain operative procedures such as rubber dam or matrix application particularly on badly damaged teeth

A

DISADVANTAGES of PLASTIC FILLING MATERIALS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

can be performed by combining a prefabricated post with auto polymerizing resin

A

DIRECT PROCEDURE FOR SINGLE-ROOT TEETH for CAST METAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

cast post and core restoration should be slightly undersized in relation to the prepared post space in order to ensure full seating

A

INVESTING AND CASTING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

post fit should not be loose that light finger pressure causes rocking, rotation, or wobbling

A

INVESTING AND CASTING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

→ tight fit can cause root fracture
→ casting alloy should have suitable physical properties
→ Ni-Cr alloys have high moduli of elasticity and are
recommended for cast posts

A

INVESTING AND CASTING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

→ casting defects (small nodules)
→ post insertion resistance
→ the shape of the foundation is evaluated and adjusted as
necessary until tooth preparation geometry is optimal

A

EVALUATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

→ the luting agent must fill all space within the root canal system → voids may be a cause of periodontal inflammation via lateral
canals

A

CEMENTATION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

→ a rotary (Lentulo) spiral filler or cement tube is used to fill the
canal with cement

A

CEMENTATION

17
Q

→ the post and core restoration is inserted gently to reduce
hydrostatic pressure, which could cause root fracture

A

CEMENTATION

18
Q

use of such venting procedures has also been shown to reduce the necessary seating force, although the latter is probably
cement specific

A

CEMENTATION

19
Q
  • an existing post and core restoration must be removed (ex.: for re-treatment of a failed root canal filling)
  • patients must understand in advance that post removal is a risky process and occasionally results in radicular fracture and tooth loss
A

REMOVAL OF EXISTING POSTS

20
Q

→ thin-beaked forceps will be used if post exposed coronally
→ ultrasonic scaler weakens water-based cement
→ a thin scaler tip or special post removal tip is recommended

A

REMOVAL OF EXISTING POSTS

21
Q

a post that has fractured within the root canal cannot be removed with a post puller or forceps

A

REMOVAL OF EXISTING POSTS

22
Q

→ the post may be possible drilled out, but great care is needed to avoid perforation
→ drill out if post has been fractured within the root canal

A

REMOVAL OF EXISTING POSTS

23
Q

another means of handling an embedded fractured post (described by Masserann in 1966) is to use a special hollow end-cutting tube (or tephrines) to prepare a thin trench around the post

A

MASSERANN TECHNIQUE

24
Q

retrieval can be facilitated by using an adhesive to attach a hollow tube extractor or by using a threaded extractor

A

MASSERANN TECHNIQUE