Lektioner Joe. Flashcards

1
Q

Complexity?

A

Leads to increasing uncertinty?? -> climate models are unsure. Needs longer term dev in society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gaps in knowledge?

A

Scientific Env. knowledge is uneven around the world, indigenius people are ignored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Globalization?

A

not good or bad, but disruptive and unpredictible. The consequenses are unequally distributed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Organisations & Management ?

A

Org have employeed managers and managment to ensure that Org work in a particular way -> to ensure that goals are archived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Governance + EM?

A

A result of “Hollowing out of the state”, can be a symtom of bad development.
Can be god or bad -> retursystem för pantflaskor, Pantamera mm.
Kan ske genom Lagar eller Frivilliga förändringar.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The diffrence between EM & EMS?

A

Not the same thing!

EM= the leadership actions. What Env. problems we contribute to & Env impact can form strategic goals.

EMS= tools to achive Em.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Company narratives & Env problems?

A

-Villians
-Victims of activists /terroirist
- Hero = Opportunities & problem solving, new niches for customers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Business are?

A

A major part of economic system. Buy resurses, transform them, sell goods, get profit. We have adopted our way of living to this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Government & real practices of Env sustanability?

A

Env Ministersare often “junior” departments, at the best the Minister is able to achive a compromise.
- Gov will only persu sustanability to a limited point. Ex: phase out substances vs continuing fosil fuel subsidies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Panarchy Theory?

A

A model dev. from Ecological perspective. Ecosystem functions & nature need to be better undertod by humans, before making decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DM - Disaster Management?

A

Police, firemen.. Are moving from a specifiv event, to se all (?) disasters as symptoms of a long-term process -> risk society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The 3 R in DM?

A

Respond
Recovery
Rebulding
= return to normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

DM & Natural disasters?

A

-Cant controll it
-often spontanius cooperation & cordination
- solve crisis & rebild community togehther
- short-term damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

DM & Technical disasters?

A

-loss of control over systems
-afterwards: arguing/pont finger at each other
-profit over people
- damage in long or short term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

DM & Hybrid disasters?

A

-combination of natural/tech failures & unusual natural events. (snö + E22)
- Pandemic = global logistics & just in time deleveries = weakneses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anticipatory Suprise Management?

A

To avoid being suprised by: Unthinkable circumstances, unexpected events, unknowable impacts.
Solution =
1. Reject rutines
2. Less rigidity in EM
3. Go outside the box etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The Black Swan?

A

A methaphor for a rare event, beyond normal expectations.
HOW Firms/networks are organized can diminish the effects of a black swan event.

18
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Psychological Bias?
A

Interpretation of evidence in only 1 way, tends for following a pre-concidered idea.
Increases tendency for a further narrow interpretation/tolkning.

19
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Anomalies?
A

We tend not to look for anomalies, but should look fornegative instances more, instead of ignoring them.

20
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Order?
A

we ipose a order on a series of observations/facts/experiences.
Our ability to do this confirms our belif that we understand. Also, our order maybe not the only explenation.

21
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Simple explenations?
A

Looking for simple explenations of “Complexity”, may not be the best explenation.

22
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Unusual events & Pre-concived ideas?
A

Anomalies get suboriented, instead of beeinga possibility to reflect/create new understanding on things.

23
Q

Confirmation bias:

  1. Black swans?
A

Individuals & society tends to belive/behave as black Swans dont exists, but we know they do.

24
Q

Making Black Swans “grey”?

A

Vs not just plan for the expected.
What you dont know, is at least as relevant to decisions, than what you allredy know.

25
Q

3 diffrent kind of Uncertinty & Unknowns?

A
  1. Unknown unknowns = No one is aware of the event.
  2. Unknown knowns = we have no knowledge, but others may know, but we dont know the knowledge of others.
  3. Extremly small Probability = the likelihood is considered small/low, and its ignored. Was known, but then made “unknown”.
26
Q

Weak signlas?

A

-People, Org, Networks are drowning in signals/noises, makes it difficult to hear weak signals.
-All weak signals may not be important.
- The point is to be redy to act when noticing a signal not going away/get stronger, and act.

27
Q

GRI & Sustanability reports?

A

3 diff Standards in reports.
1. GRI1 -Universal: Dokuments, principles, env codes. (green)
2. GRI 2 -Sector : Org + context, structire, policies. (Orange).
3. GRI3 - Topic: spec. info. impacts, dialog with stakeholder/experts, processes etc. (lila)

28
Q

CSR Concepts?

A
  • TBL, Tripple Bottom line (people, Planet, profit)
    -CS, Corporate Sustanability
    -CC, Corporate Citizenship
29
Q

CSR are?

A

Corporate Social Responsability =
volontary & integrated with org on Social/Ecological concerns, in their business activities.
EX: companies support local sports, arenas, money for infrastructure etc. “Re-invest” in society.

30
Q

A High-Carbon economy?

A

Politics & groups in the elit, trys to maintain/keep this system..
But started moving from denial to understanding, slowly..

31
Q

3 diffrent climate frames?

A
  1. Gradualism: slow change.
  2. Catastrophism: needs a fast change.
  3. Denialism: has always been changes in climate & human act don’t affect the system.. planet can’t. Stop human dev. & tech. Are limitations but we can round them with tech. Also ta late to do anything vs BAU.
32
Q

Mitigation?

A

Actions thats leads to reduction in emission.

33
Q

Adaptation?

A

Adapting to climate change means taking action to adjust to its present and future impacts. Also, adapting to life in a changing climate – involves adjusting to actual or expected future climate

34
Q

Diffrent climate models?

A

GCM = Global cirkulation model

RCM = Regional cirkulation model

35
Q

RM, Risk Management are?

A

The process incl. Risk Assessment and its used with other information (data, costs, economic/social consequences) to make regulatory decisions.

36
Q

Risk Assessment are?

A

Scientific aspect, including data to describe the form & characteristics of risks, vs harm to nature/env/humans.
-How risky is the situation?

37
Q

EIA, Environmental Impact analysis?

A

Tracing the relevant physical/ Ecological linkages to Env impact of different projects.

38
Q

CBA - Cost-benefit analysis are a?

A

Tool used to appraise (bedömma) policies & public projects. Bridges, roads, dams, airports. And their net contribution to social benefits.
-> investment is profitable if ‘‘monetary’’ value exeeds the costs vs social benefits.

39
Q
  1. Precautionary Principle?
A

Action against certain practices, potential for damage & consequences. No scientific proof needed. Ex: Global warming, ozone, new species.

40
Q

Opportunity cost?

A

Forgone opportunity to do alternative things with money / time / activity.
Is it worth it? = compare to other things you could be doing instead.