Legal Authority/Use Of Force/Deadly Force Flashcards

0
Q

Under what circumstances can an HPD officer search a vehicle?

A

1) when conducting random or robust searches,
2) with “consent” following advisement of their ferrier rights’
3) under exigent circumstances when you can demonstrate threat to life or evidince
4) with a warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

When can physical force best be justified?

A

When it is apparent that other alternatives will be ineffective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe when a Terry Stop may be initiated.

A

When the officer has “reasonable suspicion” that a crime has, is or about to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State and define the four elements needed prior to using deadly force.

A

1) Ability: does the suspect have the ability to cause serious bodily injury or death (I.e. weapon)
2) Oppurtunity: Is the suspect in a position to cause serious bodily injury or death (i.e. proximity).
3) Immediate Jeopardy: Does the officer believe their life or another’s is in immediate threat of serious bodily injury or death.
4) Preclusion: all lesser means have been attempted or are not feasible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What defines HPD’s Arrest Authority?

A

10 CFR 1047

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where does HPD’s arming authority originate?

A

161K Atomic Energy Act 1954

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Per DOE what are the 5 circumstances where an officer may use deadly force?

A

1) Self-defense
2) Defense of Others
3) Nuclear Weapons or Nuclear Explosive Devices
Prevent the theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of a nuclear weapon or nuclear explosive device.
4) Special Nuclear Material
To prevent theft, sabotage, or unauthorized control of SNM.
5) Apprehension
Prevent the escape of a person reasonably believed to have committed an offense of the nature specified in the above four circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference between a search and a frisk?

A

Search: conducted following an arrest to locate criminal evidence.

Frisk (pat down): conducted durning a terry stop (with articulable officer safety concerns) of the outer clothing for possible weapons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When may an HPD officer utilize deadly force?

A

When necessary to defend themselves or another from death or serious bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When must Miranda warnings be issued?

A

1) custody
(Subject is not free to leave)
2) interrogation
The officer is asking self-incriminating questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the 4th amendment in regards to Use of Force.

A

The 4th Amendment protects an individual’s rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. Using force on an individual is a seizure of their person. For the force to be lawful, the force must be reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where can state laws regarding Use of Force be found?

A

In the Revised Code of Washington (RCW).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain the 4th amendment in regards to searches?

A

The 4th Amendment protects an individuals rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. All searches of persons/ places/ objects and effects must be reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the five circumstances when a person may use force.

A

1) Protect yourself or another from assault or injury.
2) Arrest a person you know has committed a felony.
3) Prevent theft or property damage.
4) Detain a trespasser for the purpose of investigation.
5) Detain a suspected shoplifter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the court case of Graham v. Connor, including the court’s ruling.

A

G v. C:
In GvC, a police officer conducted a Rolling Terry Stop, an individual exited the vehicle and behaved abnormally (individual in question was diabetic and was in need of sugar). The officer used force to detain the individual and in the process broke the individual’s ankle.

The court ruled that “police officers are expected to make split second decisions in tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving circumstances and do not have the luxury of 20/20 hind sight.”

The case established the “objectively reasonable” standard, whether the officer’s actions are objectively reasonable in light of facts and circumstances confronting hyphen without regard to to their underlying intent or motivation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the case Forrester versus City of San Diego including the courts ruling.

A

Police were called to disperse an unlawful protest at an abortion clinic. The police gave multiple warnings for the crowd to disperse, then used a pain-compliance technique involving nunchucks, which resulted in a woman’s wrist being broken.

The question raised was “was the force necessary and reasonable to accomplish the objective”. The court said yes the officers acted reasonably and ruled that officers are not required to use the least intrusive amount of force, rather that the force used is reasonable.

16
Q

Describe the court case Tennessee v. Garner including the courts ruling.

A

In Tennesee v. Garner, two officers responded to a burglary in progress at a residence, one officer went in through the front, the other went around back. The officer saw the suspect exit out the window from the back of the house. The suspect attempted to get away, and the officer shot and killed the suspect. Which was within the scope of the law at the time.

The court reviewed the case and redefined when an officer may use force:
1st prong, in the defense of themselves or another when have reason to believe that they or another are in immediate danger of death or serious physical harm.

2nd prong: when capturing or seizing a dangerous suspect when there is probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed a crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of serious physical harm and there is no reasonably safe means of preventing the suspect’s escape.

17
Q

When can an HPD officer make a felony arrest (per 10 CFR 1047)?

A

If hue he offense is committed in the presence of the officer or he/she has probable cause to believe that the individual to be arrested has committed/ is committing the crime.

18
Q

When can an HPD officer enforce Title 46 of the RCW?

A

NEVER!

19
Q

When can an HPD officer make a misdemeanor arrest (per 10 CFR 1047)?

A

When the offense is committed in his/her presence.