Lecture 9 (Cognition) - Slides Flashcards

0
Q

Wason Selection Task

what is it, other experiments

A

1) Indicate only the card(s) you definitely need to turn over to see if the following rule is true.
“If a card has a vowel on one side, then it has an even number on the other side” - If P then Q
A B 2 3
- Correct Answer: A and 3 (P and not-q)
- A confirms the theory, 3 tries to falsify

  • 25% of people get this right
  • If presented in social contexts relevant to evo. psych (e.x. cheater detection), correct responses improve dramatically
  • If a person is drinking beer, they must be 18 years old
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Attention & Memory

A
  • We have a limited amount of resources that we can expend and allocate
  • Importance of speed of response
  • Psychological adaptations evolved in response to frequent selection pressures
  • Having enhanced responses, attention and memory to specific things may be this
  • But our ability to solve problems does not seem to generalize to all domains. It is specific to the problem it solves
  • Example: Wason Task, 3 areas of enhanced attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 Social Scenarios which influence memory and attention

A

1) Mating
- Mate value relevant traits direct attention (Dewall and Manner (2 experiments))
- Mate preferences influence memory encoding & retrieval (Manner 2007)

2) Foraging
- Object location memory influenced by survival-relevance (about the context, not the item itself) (Silverman et al. 2007)
- Sex differences in spatial abilities track sexual division of foraging labour (Krasnow et al. 2011)
- High caloric payoff items remembered more accurately (new et al)

3) Fear
- Emotion produced by perception of present/impending danger and causes some kind of action on our part
- Obvious adaptive value (evolutionary lag when it comes to fears - afraid of spiders more than cars/guns)
- Normal in appropriate circumstances
- Ohman et al, Face Experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DeWall & Manner, 2008

Experiment 1

A
  • Saw 2 sets of photos (men/women) of 12 targets
  • Targets manipulated by exposure time (unlimited vs. 4-seconds)
    and “status” (wore a suit or rags)
  • Task: Estimate % of targets that we high status 2 or distractor: eyes open, smiling, etc.

Results
When participants had limited time to assess, they over-estimate proportion of high status that are present but NOT for females (almost underestimation)
-Why not status cues in females? May not represent information that is relevant to their mating goals/reproduction
- Why status? High SES men capture our attention
High SES men represent 2 categories: attraction for females, and intrasexual competition in males
- Effect exists for males AND females viewers

Summary

  • Limitations on attentional capacity caused participants to base their frequency estimates on targets that captured their attention more
  • Fitness-relevant stimuli may capture our attention even when performing another task.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DeWall & Manner, 2008
(Experiment 2)
- 2 different kinds of motivation influencing our attention and summary

A
  • Took Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (Measures sexual restrictiveness (e.x. how important is commitment to sex), Relationship Alternatives Scale (motivation to mate/current relationship satisfaction)
  • Set up with an eye tracker
  • Presented with photo arrays (8 targets).
  • Manipulated attractiveness and social status of 2 targets (2 were high att/high SS, 2 high att/low ss, etc..)

Results

  • Participants spent more than half the time attending to high status male targets (replicates exp. 1), less than half to hight status females.
  • Spent more time looking at high status males than high status females
  • Spent more than half the time looking at high att male/females
  • SOI: positive association between SOI scores and attention to attractive opposite sex. Suggests they are looking for mates. But what we attend to when we look differs
  • RAS: Interest in alternatives was positively associated with attention to high status males for female viewers only. Suggests females are looking for EPCs

Summary
- Mate choice relevant attributes capture our attention when they are specific to our reproductive goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Maner et al. (2007)

What kind of psychological effect occurs

A
  • Participants were primed to be motivated towards mate-searching/mate-guarding by writing about 1 of 2 scenarios (write 5 sentences that are about mate-searching/guarding (or control), pick the most valent sentence and write more about it)
  • Scenario 2 was writing about intrasexual vigilance (guarding mate) by writing about anxiety or jealousy (both -ve valence)
  • Took SOI and measured intrasexual vigilance measures.
  • Then completed a visual dot probe procedure: looked at a mid-line “x”, then a picture of a face was presented quickly, then a circle or a square would be presented where the face was or elsewhere
  • Faces were manipulated for attraction
  • Measured reaction time and accuracy
  • Effect: Attentional Adhesion: “capturing attention through slower reaction time and accuracy

Results

  • For both men and women, attractive women capture our attention. Because high attractive women are attractive to men but represent competition for women.
  • SOI + Attractiveness: When primed to sexual arousal/mate-searching (mating goals), individuals with an unrestricted score are unable to disengage from an attractive opposite-sex targets as a restricted individual (~150 ms). Attractiveness effect occurs in those who are ready to mate.
  • Vigiliance: Those score high on vigilance and are primed to jealousy were unable to disengage as quickly as controls or low vigilance.

Summary

  • Harder to disengage attention from attractive females but not males
  • Attentional adhesion predicted by mating goals and intrasexual competition.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Allan et al. 2012

A
  • Learning procedure: looked at 30 faces masc/fem, shown random object beside their face (types of fish), then given an distractor -sudoku for 5 minutes.
  • Were then only shown the object paired to the previous face and asked which of the two (fish) had they previously seen.

Results:

  • Women who like masc. male faces remember the associated objects more accurately.
  • No effect for women looking at women.
  • Specific to potential mates for women because of choosiness - women want to have a longer period of assessment. Might have to do with recalling social info about potential mates
  • Might not be the same for men because of different mate goals/preferences. It isn’t as costly for men to make a bad choice or have less memory for good quality mates.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Foraging Adaptation Theory

Computer Experiment

A

Theory: Food items that are relevant to survival are going to have privilege in our cognition (ex memory)

  • Participants asked to rate and remember 8 food items at 8 locations
  • Rate how easily the item could be collected
  • Read they were doing this for survival or scavenger hunt (control)
  • Then given a surprise recall task. Shown a banana, and asked to click on the screen where it was located.

Results:

  • Doesn’t matter if the items were near/far on the screen, but the scenario manipulation made participants more accurate at recalling where the pixelated food item on the screen was
  • We are not privelaged to remember apples/grapes overall. It’s about the relevance of those items to US and our situation.

Exp. 2

  • Does it matter if they are fruits or animals?
  • Hunting scenario: ease of capturing prey for survival vs. hunting contests.

Results:
- Same effect as fruit (scenario influenced accuracy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Foraging Adaptation Theory

Summary

A
  • Contextual framing in terms of survival results in more object location memory for both stationary and moving food items
  • Hunting mobile prey and gathering immobile resources have different computational requirements
  • Sex differences should occur in foraging-relevant cognitive functions that mirror sexual division of labor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Food Adaptation Theory

Sex advantages and differences

A

Hunting

  • Male advantage
  • Prey pursued over erratic courses, unfamiliar environments, should advantage men in the use of cardinal directions and 3-d mapping
  • Silverman et al. 2007

Gathering

  • Female Advantage
  • Must register and store multiple locations within well-known constrained environments
  • Silverman et al. 2007, Krasnow et al. 2011, New et al

Differences

  • Females: prefer colours associated with ripeness
  • Make finer taste discriminations
  • Have better taste memory
  • Better at discriminating/remembering plants
  • Prefer fruits over meats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Silverman et al. 2007

OLM and 3DMRT

A
  • Online, 40 countries, 250k participants (huge sample)
  • Object Location Memory Task: Going to see a bunch of items, remember where they are, then some move and you have to identify which move (would expect females to have an advantage)
  • 3D Mental Rotation Task: see block shapes, asked to select which of the following options are that shape.

Results

  • OLM: Females better than males, 3D: vice versa
  • Sex differences in spatial abilities tracks sexual division of foraging labour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Krasnow et al. 2011

A
  • Viewed object array
  • Images of fruit, tools, animals, buildings, electronics
  • Asked 2 questions: 1) Non-spatial memory: Is this item old or new? 2) What location was this old item seen in the array.

Results
- Only reliable sex difference found in spatial memory was in the fruit category. Women remember fruit location better than men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

New et al

A
  • Farmers market mapped out in a grid.
  • Participants thought they were going to look at farmer market stalls and taste food/rate them
  • For ‘farmer’s market research’
  • After visiting all stalls, participants taken to center of market and asked to point in the direction of each stall (measured degrees of accuracy in pointing)

Results

  • Women are more accurate at point to location of food items than men
  • Foods with higher caloric density were pointed to more accurately by both sexes
  • Even after they controlled for everything possible.
  • (see chart)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Threat Perception

Defenses against attack, which was due to warfare

A
  • Survival-relevant stimuli increase RTs and accuracy for both human/non-human threats (fruit, face fear experiments)
  • Freezing (if unsure where threat is, better to stand still)
  • Fleeing
  • Fighting (show you are not a prey item, hope competitor disengages)
  • Submission/appeasement
  • Fright
  • Fainting: exclusively human, women faint more and happens in children more than adults to be not seen as a combatant. Might have evolved due to warfare.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evolved Physiological Reactions

what inputs into it?

A
  • Psychological adaptation inputs into evolved physiological reactions
  • Epinephrine: aids in blood clotting, and releases stored glucose in the liver (burst of energy you need to respond)
  • Heart rate: Divert blood flow from digestion to muscles
  • Increased respiration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ohman et al

Fear experiment

A
  • Participants exposed to 3x3 photo matrices
  • Task: are the pictures all the same or is 1 different. Determine if they are same/different
  • Measured RT
  • Images were either fear relevant (snakes/spiders) or irrelevant

Results

  • (chart) Performance for discrimination in each image position on the screen
  • Snakes and spiders detected faster/more accurately than flowers/mushrooms within a matrix of the other distractor
  • Effect is stronger if you have a phobia to the fear
17
Q

Face experiment

Fear experiment and other

A
  • Does a threatening face caputre our attention like snake/spiders?
  • Same paradigm as Ohman et al. except with illustrated faces with emotional expression (through eyebrow direction and mouth)
  • Tested with friendly, scheming, sad, threatening and neutral expressions

Results
- Our reaction time and accuracy is much better for threatening faces only

  • Tested if it’s based on a place cell as a proximate theory and examined if inverted faces have the same results (is it encoded at a deep brain level)
  • Why inverted: Low level facial perception is tested with this method. Inverted faces are difficult to process and encourages you to focus on how the lines are arranged)

Results:

  • Emotional distractors negatively influence our accuracy and reaction time
  • Still an advantage regardless of inversion or what kind of distractor it is
  • We still interpret inverted faces as faces.
  • ** Threatening faces act like snakes/spiders**
  • See chart
18
Q

Cognition Summary

A
  • Attention & memory limited resource
  • Adaptive allocation with respect to specific adaptive problems
  • Observable in mating, foraging, and threat contexts