Lecture 9 - Beliefs and attitudes 2 Flashcards

1
Q

How could intelligence drive attitude formation?

A

When considering social, moral and political situations, those with greater cognitive skill are able to form more individualistic and open-minded (i.e. antiauthoritarian) attitudes than those of lesser cognitive ability

Old claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What correlation did McCourt et al. (1999) find between IQ and RWA?

A

Negative - r = -0.37

I.e. the less intelligent participants were in the sample, the more likely they were to espouse right-wing authoritarian views.
However, cross-sectional study - cannot establish cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Stankov (2009) employed western measures of conservatism and cognitive tests to his sample - what was an issue with this?

A

His sample included many foreign students applying to US university - western measures may not be valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Did Stankov (2009) find negative correlations between conservatism and cognitive ability?

A

Yes - from negative 0.23 to 0.4

Cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Deary, Batty & Gale (2008) tested childhood intelligence at 10 years to see if this predicted political attitudes and political party preference at age 30. What did they find?

A

Those who endorse liberal/non-traditional attitudes as adults did better as kids in intelligence tests

Those having voted or likely to vote for Greens and Liberal Democrats as adults did better as kids in intelligence tests
(while BNP-voters were below average intelligence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is structural equation modelling?

A

Statistical technique for inferring causal relationships between latent & observed variables
(But still true that ‘correlation is not causation’)

Strength of association/magnitude of relationship between one variable and another, but tells us nothing about causality - all correlational

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are g and liberalism directly measurable constructs?

A

No - constructs derived from many smaller tests of underlying attitudes/abilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In 2016 in the US, did voting patterns reflect the relationship between higher intelligence and liberal attitudes?

A

Yes
e.g. Democrat advantage for post-grads is +40% in Wisconsin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In 2012 in the US, did voting patterns reflect the relationship between higher intelligence and liberal attitudes?

A

More complex - least & most-educated vote Democrat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can most variability in political attitudes later in life be explained by g score at 10?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is social class a good predictor of liberal attitudes?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is the relationship between childhood intelligence and adult liberal attitudes mediated by education and class?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why are the temporal constraints on measuring childhood intelligence with adult political attitudes helpful for inferring causation?

A

adult Liberal attitudes can’t cause childhood general intelligence

g earlier on plausibly might shape later liberal attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Kanazawa suggest is the adaptation of intelligence?

A

To deal with evolutionarily novel thinking - liberalism is an example of a novel idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kanazawa (2010) measured intelligence using Peabody Picture vocabulary test (verbal intelligence measure), and measured adult political orientation. What did they find?

A

Adolescent intelligence predicts subsequent political orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Argyle (1958) find out about the relationship between intelligence and atheism?

A

“Intelligent students are much less likely to accept orthodox beliefs, and rather less likely to have pro-religious attitudes”
Orthodox = traditional conservative way of thinking

1) As per political orthodoxy, intelligence dampens religious attitudes
2) However, intelligence has a stronger effect upon orthodoxy/traditionalism (in a general sense) than upon religious attitudes

Simply put:
Intelligence places more obstacles to accepting conservatism than it does to accepting religious faith.

17
Q

What were three reasons why intelligence might undermine religious beliefs as put by Zuckerman et al. (2013)?

A

1) Intelligent people less likely to conform, so can resist religious dogma.
2) Intelligent people higher in analytical thinking than intuitive thinking.
3) Intelligence confers some of the benefits of religion (better social bonds), so religion is thus less necessary.

18
Q

What was the average correlation between intelligence and strength of religious beliefs found by Zuckerman et al. (2013)?

A

-0.20 to -0.25

19
Q

In Bell’s (2002) multi-study review, how many studies found a negative correlation between intelligence and religious belief?

A

39/43 studies found a negative correlation between intelligence & religious belief. Pretty robust finding!

However correlations are fairly weak, but still consistently found

20
Q

When is the intelligence-religion association stronger?

A

1) in college students & general population than pre-college students.
i.e. stronger as you age.

2) for religious beliefs than behaviours
Don’t believe in god, still go to church/mosque, still follow religious festivals

21
Q

What is school-age intelligence also positively correlated with other than liberalism and atheism?

A

View that men should be monogamous

22
Q

What is a strength of Kanazawa’s study?

A

Large samples - study 1 had over 15,000 respondents

23
Q

What was the difference in IQ points between lowest and highest religiosity groups, and difference in IQ points between lowest and highest conservatism groups?

A

Religious - 6
Political attitudes - 12

Double the effect for political attitudes, but generally the same pattern

Intelligence may allow for abstract analytical thinking which underlies both these findings

24
Q

Why might the association between religion and low intelligence be weaker in countries with high levels of religion?

A

Society is strongly biased to be religious so there is a lot of variance under ‘religious’ people - may be a higher effect among less religious countries but no studies on this yet

25
Analytical thinking - what is the dual-process idea of human thinking?
System 1: relies on frugal heuristics (approximations, shortcuts) yielding intuitive answers System 2: relies on deliberative analytical processing System 2 often overrides system 1, when analytic tendencies are activated and cognitive resources are available for system 2
26
In Gervais and Norenzayan (2012), subjects completed analytical thinking task and then three measures of religious belief. What were correlations between analytical thinking task and religious belief for: Intrinsic religiosity Intuitive religious belief Supernatural agents
Intrinsic religiosity (r = -0.22) Intuitive religious belief (r = -0.15) Supernatural agents (r = -0.18)
27
What is the equation for assessing heritability?
2 x (MZ - DZ)
28
What is the equation for assessing shared environment?
(2 x DZ) - MZ
29
What is the equation for assessing unshared environment?
1 - MZ
30
What does unique life experience predict a lot of variance in?
Political beliefs
31
How much of variance in political attitudes/beliefs is accounted for by genes?
1/3 Shared environment not that strong, influence of unique experience is stronger
32
Ludeke et al. (2013) suggest that a single heritable factor called 'obedience to traditional authority' might explain what?
a sizeable proportion of the variance in beliefs and attitudes Obedience to traditional authority relates to authoritarianism, conservatism, and religiousness.
33
What was the heritability of the traditionalism factor in Ludeke et al. (2013)?
0.52 Genes have an influence but life experience is more of a factor
34
Hatemi et al. (2009) examined three factors for political attitudes over lifespan - additive genetic, shared environment, and unique environment. How does genetic influence change over time?
Genetic influences are absent/minimal early on, then increase with age, before suddenly declining at age 75+
35
Hatemi et al. (2009) examined three factors for political attitudes over lifespan - additive genetic, shared environment, and unique environment. How does shared environment influence change over time?
Shared environment explains most of variance in political attitudes in early adulthood, then declines before increasing again at around 66+
36
Hatemi et al. (2009) examined three factors for political attitudes over lifespan - additive genetic, shared environment, and unique environment. How does unique environment influence change over time?
This is relatively stable over time
37
What does Hatemi (2009) show that you need to account for when examining individual differences in political belief?
Age