Lecture 8 Pricing Flashcards
bargaining settings
when you can change the price, don’t have to take the first offer
first offers in bargaining
- first offer extremity
- precision
- ranges
- rationales
- transparancy
- framing
first offer extremity
idea that first offer in settings where bargaining is possible has a big influence on the final price.
This occurs in a lot of literature, lot of evidence.
first mover advantage
person that makes first offer ends up with higher size of pie in bargaining/negotiating setting.
anchoring effect
idea that numbers have a strong effect on our judgement
first mover advantage is driven by this
study on anchoring effect
asked people simple questions with random number (higher or lower than 10/65%).
people did not adjust enough from the given number.
we also do this in negotiation; counteroffer is not adjusted sufficiently
meta-analysis on first offer effects
- correlation between first offer with negotiation outcome (r = .60)
- sequence: first mover recieved more favorable outcomes than second movers
- magnitude: extreme first offers led to higher outcomes than moderate ones
conclusion: first movers commonly claim more value and the first offer functions as anchor.
what lessens anchoring effect
experts, having relevant useful information you can use to make a decision?
studied with real estate.
-> both students and experts are affected by anchoring effects.
-> amateurs realise they are affected, experts think they aren’t.
LOC and sensitivity to first prices
Locus of control
- People with external LOC are influenced by first offer
- people with internal LOC are less (not) influenced by first offer
Study had participants fill in LOC survey and do a negotiation task.
first mover disadvantages?
- When information assymetry is extreme
- When revealing too much information
- When the first offer is too extreme resulting in impasse
Price precision
number of values that are not zero at the end of the price
difference in price precision study?
had people estimate a price based on given prices varying in roundness.
- when anchor is round, adjustment away from anchor is high
- when it is precise, adjustment is much smaller.
underlying mechanisms of anchor adjustment
from the study on price precision
- scale granularity (cognitive) = because the scale has more points you adjust less.
- attribution of competence (social) = precise price makes it looks like the person that set it really thought about it
is there such a thing as too much precision?
study
field study with experts and amateurs that had to give counteroffers and willingness to pay based on different levels of precision.
- amateurs: higher precision leads to even less adjustment
- experts: there is a sweet spot
Why do experts have a precision sweet spot
because for experts the attribution of competence disappears. too much precision no longer reflects confidence, but a lack of it.