Lecture 8 Pricing Flashcards

1
Q

bargaining settings

A

when you can change the price, don’t have to take the first offer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

first offers in bargaining

A
  1. first offer extremity
  2. precision
  3. ranges
  4. rationales
  5. transparancy
  6. framing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

first offer extremity

A

idea that first offer in settings where bargaining is possible has a big influence on the final price.
This occurs in a lot of literature, lot of evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

first mover advantage

A

person that makes first offer ends up with higher size of pie in bargaining/negotiating setting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

anchoring effect

A

idea that numbers have a strong effect on our judgement

first mover advantage is driven by this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

study on anchoring effect

A

asked people simple questions with random number (higher or lower than 10/65%).
people did not adjust enough from the given number.
we also do this in negotiation; counteroffer is not adjusted sufficiently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

meta-analysis on first offer effects

A
  • correlation between first offer with negotiation outcome (r = .60)
  • sequence: first mover recieved more favorable outcomes than second movers
  • magnitude: extreme first offers led to higher outcomes than moderate ones

conclusion: first movers commonly claim more value and the first offer functions as anchor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what lessens anchoring effect

A

experts, having relevant useful information you can use to make a decision?
studied with real estate.
-> both students and experts are affected by anchoring effects.
-> amateurs realise they are affected, experts think they aren’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

LOC and sensitivity to first prices

Locus of control

A
  • People with external LOC are influenced by first offer
  • people with internal LOC are less (not) influenced by first offer

Study had participants fill in LOC survey and do a negotiation task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

first mover disadvantages?

A
  • When information assymetry is extreme
  • When revealing too much information
  • When the first offer is too extreme resulting in impasse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Price precision

A

number of values that are not zero at the end of the price

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

difference in price precision study?

A

had people estimate a price based on given prices varying in roundness.
- when anchor is round, adjustment away from anchor is high
- when it is precise, adjustment is much smaller.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

underlying mechanisms of anchor adjustment

from the study on price precision

A
  • scale granularity (cognitive) = because the scale has more points you adjust less.
  • attribution of competence (social) = precise price makes it looks like the person that set it really thought about it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

is there such a thing as too much precision?

study

A

field study with experts and amateurs that had to give counteroffers and willingness to pay based on different levels of precision.
- amateurs: higher precision leads to even less adjustment
- experts: there is a sweet spot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why do experts have a precision sweet spot

A

because for experts the attribution of competence disappears. too much precision no longer reflects confidence, but a lack of it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

when should precise prices be avoided

A
  • when dealing with experts
  • sellers’s market
17
Q

sellers’s market

A

market where there are more buyers than sellers. because of this buyers bid above the asking price.

18
Q

Funda analysis by lecturer?

A
  • number of zero’s predicts actual selling price (positive correlation)
  • effect remained when controlled for other things
  • also occured when properties sold below the asking price where put in.

every additional zero you increase selling price with .6%

19
Q

what is the idea behind prices that end with .99

A

that we want low prices and read from left to right. we pay less attention to the end versus the beginning.
especially effective when changing the number of digits.

20
Q

paper on .99 prices outcomes?

A

price image
- prices that end with .99 are percieved as lower
- percieved as on sale

quality
- prices that end with .99 make the item quality be percieved as lower than average
- make the quality of items in the store be perceived as below average
- make the store seem less classy

so cheaper but lower quality percieved

21
Q

Pay what you want?

A

situaties in which you can decide yourself what you pay.
not common

22
Q

what determines how much we pay

in a pay what you want context

A
  • identity: self-signaling
  • valuation
  • image
  • social norms
  • social preferences
  • mindset
23
Q

identity: self-signaling

A

prices can serve as self-signaling devices
- a bad person pays less/little
- a good person pays a lot/enough

it shapes both our private and public image concerns

24
Q

disney study in self-signaling method

A

people could pay what they wanted for picture under different consequences
- CSR: fixed 12,5 or 12,5 and 50% goes to charity
- SSR: PWYW or PWYW and 50% goes to charity

25
Q

results of disney PWYW study

A
  • at fixed prices the profits are low and only small increase when charity is added
  • In PWYW without charity people pay little, but with charity profit strongly increases
  • percentage of buying decreases when charity is added in PWYW because the cost of sending a bad signal is high and people with low value for the picture then would rather not buy it at all.
26
Q

CSR: corporate social responsibility

A
  • customers might assume the company has ulterior motives
  • CSR purchases are a weak signal about the buyers intentions
27
Q

SSR: shared social responsibility

A
  • SSR exposes the company to financial risk; unlikely to have ulterior motives
  • PWYW enhances identification with the cause. money spent directly reflects self-identification

allows customers to directly express social welfare concerns through the purchasing of material goods