Lecture 8 - Boundaries of the Firm 1 Flashcards
_____ ______ refers to how much of the value chain is owned and controlled by the firm. Ownership can be both in the upstream and downstream part of the value chain
Fill in the blank word
Vetical boundaries
What does horizontal boundaries of a firm refer to?
The degree to which a firm owns companies within the same industry (competitors) or companies in similar industries as a means to pursue diversification
Following are four cases where the firm must make boundary decisions. One of them stands out - which, and why?
A) A defense contractor needs a customized machine essential for completion of a contract, should it customize the machine or make company company take over the task?
B) A specialist is needed to set up a new management info system; should we use an internal employee or temporarily hire an external specialist?
C) A firm needs a steady supply of highly specialized machine parts; how should it secure such supply?
D) A firm needs five reams of copying paper
D) A firm needs five reams of copying paper
This is a standardized transaction with no asset specificity - which makes a significant difference for the nature of the transaction.
In this example, the firm should obviously buy - but in the other cases, the decision considers more evaluation
According to Williamson, transactions in a vertical chain refers to the transfer of a good or service across a technologically separate interface
TRUE/FALSE
TRUE
Within the same industry, it is most often the case that different firms make similar make-or-buy decisions
TRUE/ FALSE
FALSE: make-or-buy decisions are arguably very contingent on the given firm - e.g., Zara frequently uses hierarchy whilst H&M uses the market more often
_____ ______ refers to when a firm internalizes upstream activities, while ____ _____ refers to when a firm internalizes downstream activities
Fill in the blank spaces
BACKWARD INTEGRATION refers to when a firm internalizes upstream activities, while FORWARD INTEGRATION refers to when a firm internalizes downstream activities
Sunk costs are the non-recoverable costs that only have the purpose of a specific transaction
TRUE/FALSE
TRUE
A contract is usually better than a merger because?
A) fewer set-up costs associated with a contractual relation
B) contractual agreements allow sometimes for better specialization
C) mergers are usually better than contractual agreements, not the other way around
A) fewer set-up costs associated with a contractual relation
B) contractual agreements allow sometimes for better specialization
WRONG: C: mergers can be better, but usually are not
According to the Core Ideas of Transaction Cost Economics introduced by Williamson, different governance structures (make or buy) are necessary for handling different transactions because….
A) people are bounded rational
B) people are not always trustworthy, but can be opportunistic
C) economies of scale
D) transactions differ with respect to frequency, uncertainty and asset specificity
A) people are bounded rational
B) people are not always trustworthy, but can be opportunistic
D) transactions differ with respect to frequency, uncertainty and asset specificity
According to Williamson, transactions differ with respect to:
A) bounded rationality exposure
B) frequency
C) asset specificity
D) uncertainty
B) frequency
C) asset specificity
D) uncertainty
A person pursuing ____ ______ focuses on his own interests, but honors agreements and shows respect for others.
Meanwhile, a person that is ________ focuses on own interests and uses all means possible to achieve then (incl. dishonoring agreements, manipulation, cheating, stealing, etc.)
Fill out the blank spaces
A person pursuing SELF-INTEREST focuses on his own interests, but honors agreements and shows respect for others.
Meanwhile, a person that is OPPORTUNISTIC focuses on own interests and uses all means possible to achieve then (incl. dishonoring agreements, manipulation, cheating, stealing, etc.)
In the case of incomplete contracts (where the contract fails to capture all possible contingencies), ex-post bargaining becomes relevant - even when people are not opportunistic and are perfectly rational
TRUE/ FALSE
FALSE: ex-post bargaining becomes relevant only when the contract is incomplete, whilst at least one party is opportunistic and the other party is bounded rational
What does NOT hold true about a complete contract?
A) all relevant future observable contingencies are specified
B) all available information is incorporated into the contract for every situation that could possibly occur
C) assumes that the comprehensiveness of the contract is obtained at no additional costs
D) agents are not opportunistic and perfectly rational
E) most contracts are not complete in reality
WRONG: D) agents are assumed opportunistic, but the principal is assumed to be COMPLETELY RATIONAL
In more complex environments, it is unrealistic to assume that contracts can be designed without costs and that they anticipate every possibility – these situations are better addressed by ______
Fill out the blank space
INCOMPLETE CONTRACTS
Following statement is NOT true about incomplete contracts:
A) contracts become incomplete when there are additional costs associated with writing complex and complete contracts
B) contracts are incomplete when it is not possible to anticipate all possible contingencies
C) contracts may become incomplete when different parties fail to interpret the terms in the same way
D) the agent is assumed opportunistic, and the principal is faced by bounded rationality
E) contracts become incomplete when some terms may be observable but unverifiable by a third-party
All options are true
A contract is complete, when it is at the same time:
A) all information is completely observable by both parties
B) free
C) verifiable by third-party
A contract is complete, when it is at the same time:
B) Free - we assume no transaction costs
C) Verifiable by third-party
WRONG:
A) only in a complete CONTINGENT contract is everything observable - in a complete contract, only the observable things are incorporated into the contract, but not everything is observable
Following incomplete contract theory, agreements that are observable but not verifiable do not constitute a meaningful contract
TRUE/FALSE
TRUE
If asset specificity (AS) is low and transaction frequency is low, then, the firm should: BUY/MAKE
BUY
If asset specificity (AS) is low and transaction frequency is high, then, the firm should: BUY/MAKE
BUY
Why is it that low asset specificity, regardless of transaction frequency, should result in buy rather than make?
A) low asset specificity is well-governed by market exchange since it ensures efficient allocation
B) the market will be efficient at punishing any bad behavior without need for expensive contracts
C) the buy option is sufficient due to abundance of alternative suppliers
D) even if asset specificity is low, the make option is still often the best choice of governance structure
A) low asset specificity is well-governed by market exchange since it ensures efficient allocation
B) the market will be efficient at punishing any bad behavior without need for expensive contracts
C) the buy option is sufficient due to abundance of alternative suppliers
WRONG: D) even if asset specificity is low, the make option is still often the best choice of governance structure