Lecture 3 Flashcards
In theory, players can make ____, so that the efficient option is chosen. Sometimes, the efficient strategy leads to one of the players being worse off than the inefficient strategy. Such problem can be solved by ___. “A larger cake can always be cut so at least one gets more while the rest get the same”.
Which word is missing?
Side-payments
If you don’t compensate those who will lose from a change (leading to higher efficiency), they will resists.
There are two situations where their corresponding assumptions suggests that markets can reach efficiency, eliminating the need for firms. These situations result in the “first best” outcomes.
What are these situations?
1) Fundamental Welfare Theorem
2) The Coase Theorem
Can firms reach the “first-best” outcomes?
No - “first-best” outcomes describe situations in which markets can reach efficiency, thus eliminating the need for firms.
Firms cannot reach such benchmarks, but they can approximate them - leading to “second-best” outcomes if perfect market assumptions are relaxed
Under the Fundamental Welfare Theorem, perfect competition is efficient - if each firm maximizes profits and each customer maximizes utility, and there is a supply and demand equilibrium, efficiency is reached.
Is this TRUE/ FALSE?
TRUE
Under the Fundamental Welfare Theorem, the allocation of goods and services is Pareto optimal if following holds (multiple options may be correct)
A) Each firm maximizes its profits, knowing the prices and its own production technology
B) Each consumer maximizes utility, knowing the prices and his own preferences
C) Income and prices are such that demand equals supply for every good and service
D) Positive externalities are present
CORRECT:
A) Each firm maximizes its profits, knowing the prices and its own production technology
B) Each consumer maximizes utility, knowing the prices and his own preferences
C) Income and prices are such that demand equals supply for every good and service
WRONG:
D) Positive externalities are present
Which of the following are NOT assumptions of the Fundamental Welfare Theorem?
A) Large number of consumers and producers
B) Law of one price
C) Anonymity
D) Production function view of firm
E) Communication structure entails the Walrasian auctioneer at the center
F) Contracts are complete contingent
G) Complete rationality
H) Presence of motivation problems
I) Decentralization
J) No coordination problems
K) Complete set of markets
L) No externalities
M) All goods and services can be exchanged
O) All of the above are correct
WRONG:
H) Presence of motivation problems
O) All of the above are correct
Essentially, the Fundamental Welfare Theorem assumes a perfect market allowing the elimination of any coordination and motivation problems - and therefore no need for firms since markets can reach the “first-best” outcomes.
Is this TRUE/FALSE?
TRUE
Which of the following statements are correct about Externalities? (Multiple options may be correct)
A) externality is a result of an activity that causes benefits (costs) to others with no corresponding compensation provided to (paid by) those who generate them
B) externalities destroys value and lead to inefficient outcomes
C) imposing taxes (subsidies) on activities that generate negative (positive) externalities is a solution for reaching efficiency
D) one can internalize activities through M&A
E) creating a market for externalities (defining property rights) solves the inefficiency issue
CORRECT: all options are true
Following Coase, a third way for dealing with externalities is the creation of a market for externalities.
How/Why?
A basic problem with externalities is the wrong allocation of ownership rights: If a choice is accompanied by the legal responsibility for its effects, there is no problem with externalities.
Following the Coase Theorem, the efficient amount of externalities will always be reached regardless of the allocation of property rights.
Why so?
Efficient bargaining: the players will trade externality rights until equilibrium is reached. As such, the initial allocation of property rights does not impact efficiency - only how the pie is sliced
Which are the three assumptions of the Coase Theorem?
A) Property rights are defined, allocated, and enforced
B) Bargaining is efficient
C) No externalities
D) Preferences do not exhibit wealth (income) effects
A) Property rights are defined, allocated, and enforced
B) Bargaining is efficient
D) Preferences do not exhibit wealth (income) effects
WRONG: C) No externalities –> this is an assumption of the Fundamental Welfare Theorem
The Coase Theorem states that if
1) Property rights are defined, allocated, and enforced,
2) Bargaining is efficient
3) Preferences do not exhibit income (wealth) effect
, then:
A) Players will only be subject to motivation problems, not coordination problems
B) Every allocation of property rights in externalities result in a Pareto-efficient allocation
C) Asymmetric information has no impact on the division of wealth
D) The amount of damage produced is invariant to the allocation of property rights
A) Players will only be subject to motivation problems, not coordination problems (PLAYERS FACE NEITHER UNDER THE CT)
B) Every allocation of property rights in externalities result in a Pareto-efficient allocation (TRUE)
C) Asymmetric information has no impact on the division of wealth (FALSE - EFFICIENCY IS STILL REACHED, BUT DIVISION MAY BE DIFFERENT)
D) The amount of damage produced is invariant to the allocation of property rights (TRUE)
Following the CT, with efficient bargaining, the relative bargaining power of each player has no effect on the division of costs and benefits
TRUE/FALSE
FALSE: Efficient bargaining means there are no problems in realizing the creation of the maximum value. If this is the case, the bargaining power affects ONLY THE DIVISION OF COSTS AND BENEFITS, not the size.
According to the CT, efficient bargaining (bargaining to efficiency) will materialize when… (multiple May be correct)
A) There is no information asymmetry
B) There are no wealth effects: divisions of players don’t depend on their financial position
C) Activities are internalized through M&A
D) Transaction costs are zero (bargaining is costless)
B) There are no wealth effects: divisions of players don’t depend on their financial position
D) Transaction costs are zero (bargaining is costless)
What does “no income (wealth) effect” mean? (Multiple options may be correct)
A) choices can be expressed in money
B) choices do not depend on wealth position
C) there are no financial restrictions regarding establishing a deal
D) all of the above
D) all of the above