Lecture 10 - Boundaries of the Firm 3 (From an Ownership POV) Flashcards
A governance structure is important in an incomplete contract setting, as it allocates decision rights in circumstances for which the contract has made no provisions
TRUE/FALSE
TRUE
A governance structure is only relevant when the contract is incomplete (costly to design contracts based on observable future variables)
A governance structure adds value only when the following requirements are met: select all correct:
A) the relationship has to generate a quasi-surplus
B) when the contract is observable and verifiable to a third-party
C) the quasi surplus is not»_space;completely«_space;allocated ex-ante
WRONG:
B) when the contract is observable and verifiable to a third-party –> this is a complete contract where governance structure has no value-add
One of the two requirements for a governance structure to add value is that the relationship has to generate a quasi-surplus - what does this mean?
If no quasi-surplus is generated, the competitive nature of the market ensures that the price is equal to the cost, resulting in no use for governance structure
One of the two requirements for a governance structure to add value is that the quasi-surplus generated is not ex-ante completely -»allocated«_space;- what does this mean?
If the quasi-surplus had been allocate completely (written down in a complete contract guarding against any hold-up), there is noting to bargain about, and governance structure has no value-add
Because bargaining is assumed to be efficient in the Coase Theorem, there is no need for governance structures
TRUE/FALSE
TRUE
In reality, there are often inefficiencies in the bargaining process. A governance has an impact on the nature and size of these inefficiencies, because it has consequences for …. (select all correct):
A) Information asymmetries between parties
B) Coordination costs
C) Financial restrictions on the parties
D) Alignment between parties
E) Complexity in the relation
A) Information asymmetries between parties
B) Coordination costs
C) Financial restrictions on the parties
D) Alignment between parties
______ rights delineate the rights and duties in circumstances which are verifiable. These are the rights that one has in the contractual relationship.
______ rights determine who has the decision-making power in circumstances not foreseen and not described in the contract. These are the non-specified rights.
Fill in the blank spaces
[Specific] rights; [Residual] rights
According to Michael Jensen perspective on ownership, the ownership gives the right to _____ income. That is, an owner is a _____ claimant of the profit.
Fill in the blank spaces
According to Michael Jensen’s RESIDUAL INCOME perspective on ownership, the ownership gives the right to RESIDUAL income. That is, an owner is a RESIDUAL claimant of the profit
Hart introduced the residual rights perspective on ownership. Which of the following statements hold true for his view? Select all correct
A) Hart’s perspective on ownership entails that ownership gives the right to make residual decisions
B) residual decisions are those not stipulated/ specified in a contract
C) Hart believed that Michael Jensen’s view was far from the complete picture, and argues that ownership goes beyond claim on residual income
ALL ARE CORRECT:
A) Hart’s perspective on ownership entails that ownership gives the right to make residual decisions
B) residual decisions are those not stipulated/ specified in a contract
C) Hart believed that Michael Jensen’s view was far from the complete picture, and argues that ownership goes beyond claim on residual income
A car owner rents his car to a counterparty, giving him the right to drive the car. However, the contract does not mention the right to change the color of the car. This is a decision that is for the owner of the car to make – not the renter.
What is this an exemplification of?
Hart’s residual rights perspective
Following the property rights approach perspective on ownership, following statements hold true (select all correct)
A) PRA highlights assets in an incomplete contract setting
B) it argues that right to control an asset in the relation shall be allocated to one party
C) by allocating the decision-right of control of the asset, hold-up risk is eliminated due to no need for bargaining
D) possession of the residual rights of control constitutes “ownership”
E) such delegation of decision-right helps resolve any asset-use-related conflicts in events of unforeseen contingencies
All options are correct
Transaction cost economics argue that asset specificity in face of incomplete contracting and opportunism will lead to hold-up problem (underinvestment) and an inefficient outcome - which can be solved if the firm engaged in vertical integration.
One of the critiques of the Property Rights Theory is targeting this specific argument. What is this critique?
Critique by PRT: it seems unrealistic to assume that people who behave opportunistically as an independent entity will behave fully aligned with the firm once they become employees (after VI)
Transaction cost economics argue that the same result is obtained whether the downstream firm owns upstream firm, if if upstream investor owns downstream firm
One of the critiques of the Property Rights Theory is targeting this specific argument. What is this critique?
Critique by PRT: if parties are affected differently by integration, then the form of integration and ownership structure matters –> e.g., weaker ownership share post M&A leads to weaker incentives of the target
Ownership of assets matters because?
Hint: something about bargaining power - explain how and why
Ownership gives you bargaining power from the ability to pull assets out of a relation, eliminating the counterparty’s ability to do business (recall McD example)
Why does ownership matter with respect to efficiency and value creation (bigger pie)?
Ownership of assets –> higher bargaining power –> higher value appropriated by owner –> stronger incentive to invest in relation –> value creation (efficiency)
Which of the following statements does/do NOT hold true wrt. appropriate governance structure, ownership and asset value?
A) the efficient allocation of ownership rights depends on who has the most important asset in the relationship
B) if upstream firm has the most important asset, it makes sense for him to forward integrate (acquire downstream firm)
C) if upstream firm has the most important asset, it makes sense for him to be acquired by downstream form (backward integration)
D) if upstream firm has the most important asset, and acquires downstream firm, 100% of quasi-surplus goes to upstream party
E) when the asset of each party is equally important to the relation, they should choose market rather than integrating
WRONG:
C) if upstream firm has the most important asset, it makes sense for him to be acquired by downstream form (backward integration)
Option B is the opposite of this argument, which is correct
It makes a difference who owns the asset, because (select all correct options)
A) the bargaining power of the parties varies accordingly
B) the allocation of quasi-surplus varies accordingly
C) to exemplify ownership effect: in a forward integration, the upstream party gets 100% of bargaining power and 100% of quasi-surplus
D) to exemplify ownership effect: in a forward integration, the upstream party gets almost most of the bargaining power and almost 80% of the quasi-surplus
A) the bargaining power of the parties varies accordingly
B) the allocation of quasi-surplus varies accordingly
C) to exemplify ownership effect: in a forward integration, the upstream party gets 100% of bargaining power and 100% of quasi-surplus
If each firm owns an asset each that is equally valuable to the relation, then they should engage in ______ with upstream firm getting ___ % of quasi-surplus and downstream firm getting ___% of quasi-surplus
Fill out the blank spaces
If each firm owns an asset each that is equally valuable to the relation, then they should engage in [MARKET TRANSACTION] with upstream firm getting [50]% of quasi-surplus and downstream firm getting [50]% of quasi-surplus