Lecture 8 Flashcards
biases that exist in RCTs
- selection bias
- measurement bias
in a ____ study we are comparing two groups that differ in exposure but also differ in a number of other characteristics as well
- cohort
difference in cohort studies versus RCTs
- in RCTs we impose our own intervention
- interventions are assigned randomly to participants
- much stronger case for causation
the benefit of randomizing in RCTs
- confounding is basically eliminated.
- may be imbalances in factors strictly due to chance
difference in analysis of RCTs versus cohort studies
- analysis of RCTs is simpler than analysis of cohort studies because confounding can basically be ignored
problems arise when interpreting RCTs when the trial is ____
why
- small
- null hypothesis might not be rejected either because of low power or there being no difference in the groups
- imbalance in intervention groups on important prognostic characteristics, by chance aline
type II error
- fails to detect a difference when a difference does exist
should we wait for an RCT before using every medical intervention?
- no.
once as intervention becomes part of accepted clinical practice, even in the absence of evidence, it is perceived as ____ to perform a randomized clinical trial at that point
- unethical
a recent example of a difference in findings between cohort studies and RCTs
- effect of vitamin E on ischemic heart disease
- cohorts said it reduced risk
- RCTs said that it does not
what is the name for someone figuring out the randomization scheme and could subvert it in any way
ways to avoid this
- allocation concealment
- randomization done by people not involved in enrolling subjects
- intervention assignment in a sealed envelope opened only after the patient has been enrolled in the study
what are crossovers
- people assigned to one treatment but actually receive the comparison treatment
analyze these people based on treatment that they receive not on what they were assigned
intention to treat analysis
- depends on
- subjects analyzed according to the group to which they were randomized rather the treatment actually received
- depends on the research question being asked
if participants are analyzed by the treatment they actually received, rather than what they were assigned to receive, one loses the advantages of the
- the advantages of the randomization process are lost
what is the preferred method of analysis when attempting to determine if a given treatment produces a desired result
- intention to treat