lecture 8 Flashcards
meta-analysis
type of systematic review in which data from studies that meet strict inclusion criteria is combined
2 steps
2 steps of meta-analysis
extracting the size of the Rx effect from each study
pooling the data to obtain an average single estimate based on all studies - this increase sample size
critical apprasial question
are the result valids
what ar the results
will the result hep me in caring for aptient
are the results valid
was it clear which trials were to be reivewed
were the most relevant studies reviewed
was the quality of the reviewed studies taken into account
was it clear which trials were to be reviewed
clear search strat
clearly defined scope
clear critria for inclusion and exclusion
criteria for inclusion and exclusion
type of study
type of particpant
type of intervention
outcome measures
were most relevant studies reviewed
conclude there is less evidence than there is
systematically different conclusion to those included in review
publication bias
language bias
grey lit
why assess study quality
allow to determine biases
biased primary more likely to provide misleading info
poor quality trials are building blocks of review may follow high quality methods but quality of evidence is poor
when to assess study quality
plan what criteria you will use
formal assessment of quality after trials
carried out by 2 independent reviewers
reporting trial quality
some form of quality assessment widely recommended
allocaton of concealment
blinding particpant
better to describe than score
quality can be used to influence final meta-analysis results
what are the results
continuous- size effect- difference in mean
precision- 95 percent ci or mean difference
dichotomous outcomes- size of efect- absolute risk reduction
precision- 95 percent confidence interval ARR
number needed to treat
clinical/ statistical significance
Forest plot is used
does confidence interval cross 0 is p value greater than 0.05
averaging studies
simple average gives each study equal weight
this seems intuitvely wrong