lecture 8 Flashcards
Perceptions about regime survival (p)
Before the regime is challenged, p is perceived as high and regime insiders and citizens want to avoid the cost of opposition.
As soon as some begin to express opposition, however, others recalibrate their perception of p, leading more citizens to express opposition, and so on.
The Effect of Crises on Regime Survival
- For regime insiders, economic shocks reduce the benefits of office to a partisan of the status quo in the status quo regime because wages fall
- reduce the probability of maintaining/acquiring office in the status quo regime because budget pressures reduce public employment
for regular citizens, the benefit of the status quo in the status quo regime is reduced, → opposition becomes more attractive
also, As more and more show open opposition, the perception of p declines encouraging even more opposition
The Effect of Personalisation on Regime Survival
Military dictatorship + Low personalism → Frequent coups and dispersed weapons decrease regime survival.
Military dictatorship + High personalism → Reduced risk of coups and concentration increase regime survival.
Party-based dictatorship + Low personalism → Norms of succession should increase regime survival.
Party-based dictatorship + High personalism → Hollowing out of norms should decrease regime survival.
Likelihood of Democratisation
Negotiate → Democratize
Refuse to Negotiate → Violent Removal → Unlikely to Democratize
Likelihood of Democratisation for dictator
Costs of losing power are very high (e.g. exile, prison, execution).
Unlikely to negotiate and rather cling to power until removed by force.
Likelihood of Democratisation for military dictatorships
Military officers: Low costs if country democratizes, high cost if violent overthrow of regime.
Prefer to negotiate if p decreases.
Dictator: Faces higher risk, prefers to cling to power.
With more power sharing interests of officers will prevail → democratize
With more power concentration interest of dictator → unlikely to democratize
Likelihood of Democratisation for party-led dictatorships
Party officials: Low costs if country democratizes, high cost if new autocratic regime. Prefer to negotiate if p decreases.
Dictator: Faces higher risk, prefers to cling to power.
But harder than for military to remove dictator to negotiate → unlikely to democratize.
With more power concentration, higher dependence on dictator → unlikely to democratize
most authoritarian regimes end:
as they started
Whether personalism turns to democratisation depends on
military intervention
factors when deciding whether to challenge the regime
available support and resources, chances of success
risk and potential cost of failure.
why is there a decline in coups
more autocracies began to allow semicompetitive elections
they entail risks (about half of them fail)
patron–client networks
- developed in party-led dictatorships
- help to continue distributing to those
most essential for their survival while shifting the burden of the crisis to politically weaker parts of the
population.
A dictator’s natural death in office
an exogenous challenge to the regime (i.e. unaffected by its type).