Lecture 7_MR with 3+ variables Flashcards
A partial regression coefficient (b) for a particular predictor (IV)…
simultaneously controls for (or adjusts for) the influence of all the other IVs in the model.
To minimize bias in the estimate of a key IV’s regression coefficient, what should we try to include?
it is important to include common causes (if not included it will attribute too much influence to the DV)
How do we interpret the regression coefficient (b) for a particular predictor (IV) in MR with 2+ variables?
The influence of IV on the DV, “holding all other predictors constant”
The standardized coefficients (β) provide a measure of …
the relative importance of the IV’s
What must we do to the semipartial (part) correlations to obtain their unique contribution to the variance explained?
square it (sr²)
How do we determine if one standardized coefficient (β) is significantly different than another?
- calculate the standard error of the difference between two β coefficients (Note that this involves working with the inverse of the correlation matrix among the IVs.)
- conduct a t-test on the difference in their β coefficients (able to because they are on the same metric) t = (β₁ - β₂)/SE₁-₂
What is T.Z. Keith’s “trick” to get the standard error of the difference between two β coefficients without having to use the inverse matrix?
- Use the DESCRIPTIVES command with the /SAVE option to create standardized versions of the two predictors that we wish to compare.
- Form two new terms from these variables as SUM2 = (ZX1 + ZX2) DIF2 = (ZX1 – ZX2)
- Substitute these into the regression equation in place of X1 and X2 and examine the test of significance on the difference term.
When using MR solely for the purpose of prediction, what is our goal for R²?
maximize R² (Any variable that increases its value is a candidate for entry into our model)
When using MR in explanatory work (theory testing), what is our goal for R²?
maximizing R² is less important.
– start with a set of variables that we theorize to be related to the DV, put these into our model and see how large the resulting R² value is.
What tool is useful for displaying our causal thinking regarding a set of variables?
Path diagram
What are the criteria for a proper table?
double spaced
no vertical lines
note at bottom (with R², F, df, and p values)
Table title with description at top