Lecture 6 No Hypothesis Testing Flashcards
State the Continuous Mapping Theorem.
State and prove the Continuous Mapping Theorem.
State the relationship between Normal and chi-squared distribution.
If you have a function that takes two vectors, in which cases can you say something about the distribution of the output?
Prove the distribution of the output of function that takes two arguments.
Consider an RV X_n that converges in distribution, and an RV Y_n that converges in probability. State 3 results regarding their combinations.
State the relationships between convegence in a.s, p, r-th mean, d.
State the relationship between convergence in distribution and Op(1).
State and prove the relationship between convergence in distribution and Op(1).
Consider Xn that converges in distribution, and Yn that converges in probability to 0. What can you say about XnYn?
Consider Xn that converges in distribution, and Yn that converges in probability to 0. What can you say about XnYn? Prove it.
Give the definition of a triangular array.
Give a conceptual example of data organized in the form of a triangular array.
Give an example of a sequence of RVs that depends on n directly.
State the first 3 assumptions for the Lindeberg-Feller CLT for triangular arrays. State the easy way of how to deal with situations where the first two assumptions are not exactly holding.
State the Lindeberg-Feller CLT for triangular arrays.
State Lyapunov’s condition: alternative condition that implies Lindeberg’s condition.
(Lyapunov).
State a relaxation to Lyapunov’s condition.
Consider a previous example, where we had X_in = (sigma squared * n)^(-1/2)*X_i . Show that the relaxation for the Lyapunov’s condition is sufficient for Lindeberg’s condition to hold true in this case.
State Lindeberg-Levy’s CLT for triangular arrays.
If X_in is iid across i, a sufficient condition for Lindeberg’s condition becomes
Show how to arrive at the sufficient condition for Lindeberg’s condition in the Lindeberg-Levy CLT.
State our example again and give the specific condition for Lindeberg-Levy CLT in the case of this example.
Consider: what can you say about it’s distribution? How would you start checking it?
Start checking by seeing the characteristic function converges to the characteristic function of the limit.
Show the short way: Check against assumptions of the Lindeberg condition.
Make a claim regarding the distribution of sum of RVs in one row where there is within row iid.
What is the relationship between the number of moments of an RV and the differentiability of it’s characteristic function?
Derive the second order expansion of the characteristic function around 0.
Show from first principles that the distribution of the sum of RVs is N(0,1).
