Lecture 6 Flashcards
frankenstein hypothesis
according to the brain-centered views of the mind, we don’t need to take the non-brain parts of the organism and environment into account
ways to challenge frankenstein’s hypothesis
- comes from those who defended the embodied and embedded theory of mind: the non-brain parts of the body and aspects of the environment can be used to solve cognitive problems
- extended-mind hypothesis: parts of the brain and the environment are not only used to solve cognitive problems, but they belong to the cognitive mind
biological cognition
the evolved ability of an organism to solve problems that came upon it by the environment
theoretical knowledge
knowledge that describes rules about how something should be carried out
practical knowledge
the skill needed to carry something out
cognition
ability to solve problems, using practical or theoretical knowledge
the embodied and embedded view of the mind
proposed that biological organisms actually use their brains, bodies, and the outside world to do what, in the classical cognitivist view, is only inside the artificial brain
- doesn’t see this as 3 separate processes: the entire organism is studied on how it deals with problems in its environment
embodied cognition
that the cognitive capacities of an organism are determined or strongly influenced by the type of body the organism has
embedded cognition
that the cognitive capacities of an organism are determined or strongly influenced by the environment in which the organism lives
epistemic action
actions that change the environment in such a way that they help cognitive processes
reductio ad absurdum
a way of reasoning by accepting a certain claim and then demonstrating that something absurd is the result
conclusion
consciousness and cognition are dependent on the body and the environment of the organism: the mind is embodied and embedded
- Frankenstein hypothesis is false
non-mental cognition
we can have cognitive capacities that are not conscious. this means that cognitive states can either be mental or non-mental
- cognition belonging to the mind can still be characterized as being about something. intentionality may not be a property of cognition in general
extended mind
Andy Clark and David Chalmers argued that the cognitive mind does not stop where the brain and body stop, but that the mind extends into the world
4 criteria of extended mind
- parity principle
- the external system belongs to a person’s cognitive mind only when it is reliably available and typically invoked
- the information is trustworthy
- the information is easily accessible