Lecture 4 Flashcards
consciousness chavinism
only creatures that have human brains can have conscious minds
functionalism
mental states should be understood based on their functional role or the causal relations they have with other mental states, sensory input and behavioral outputs, rather than their internal constitution or physical realization
- considers the mind as a whole
- takes both science and the mind seriously
- accepts the multiple realizability of mental states
Alan Turing
thought that machines could think
the functionalistic thought about the idea that mental states have intentionality
mental states are computational and real
Turing machine
- can replace symbols by another (or the same) symbol
- can move the tape left or right (unless the computation has finished, then it stops)
- can go to a new internal state (which can be the same as the initial state)
Turing test
a computer has to try to convince another person that it is a human being and not a computer
- when a machine succeeds in deceiving a person it passes the test
- passing the test means it is capable of thinking (thinking = computing)
mental holism
the idea that mental states and processses cannot be understood or analyzed in isolation, but rather must be considered as part of a larger interconnected system, where the meaning or content of individual mental states depends on their relationships with other mental states within the system
cognitivism
the view that mental states and processes can be understood as involving the manipulation of internal representations or symbols, akin to computational processes
- from the perspective of cognitivism, computers should be able to think
computationalism
cognition consists of a set of discrete mental states that are symbolic representations according to certain rules
classical AI
committed to cognitivism, and implements these ideas in artificial systems
functionalism vs MBIT
MBIT
reduction:
- what is the causal role analysis of X?
- whatever fulfils that role is X
- this is MBIT’s interpretation of supervenience
Functionalism
reductive explanation:
- what is the causal role analysis of Y?
- whatever fulfils that role realizes Y
- this is an alternative interpretation of supervenience
Shakey the robot
a machine able to move from A to B by taking pictures and planning a route
- not biologically realistic due to humans able to think faster
filling cabinet method
you put all the information in the system that is needed (MT) before you let the system interact with the world
- biologically unrealistic as humans are not wired that way
serial processing
another issue with machine functionalism as it is not biologically realistic that it processes information in a serial manner
John Searle
argued that a computer that has the appropriate set of rules to manipulate symbols will not be able to actually understand anything
- Chinese room experiment
- syntax doesn’t lead to semantics