Lecture 6 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Concept

A

abstract idea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Levels of inclusiveness

A

Superordinate: animal
Basic: dog
subordinate: chihuahua

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Correlational structure (Rosch)

A

of features, you see feathers, you think of a bird.
Rosch thinks children think of basis structures first and then sub and super ordinate levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Prototypes

A

highly typical basic objects. Easier to think for a basis level, sub or super ordinate levels.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do other scientist say that it’s easier for children to learn subordinate levels first and then super ordinate and basic?

A

Because at subordinate levels it would be easier to distinguish. But this has not been proved yet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Looking task (habituation)

A

MEthod: non verbal looking preference paradigm (3-4 months old)

they repeatedly showed a pic of a horse. kid habituated.
Then they presented a pic oif a dog and the horse. kid looked at the dog. So they identify (kids 3-4 months) different animals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sequential touching study
13 months vs 16-20 months old children

A

kids got set of toys: cars vs aeroplanes
13 months old: could disntiguish basic level. they touched this category more frequent than you would expect by chance.

other set of toys: animal vs vehicle
16-20 month old: could distinguish basic level and superordinate!

Limitation : prototypical objects were used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

So what was a conlcusion when they did the same study with sequential touching and when they used non prototypical objects?
13 vs 16 vs 20 months old

A
  • 13 months: no systematic behaviour
  • 16 months old: basic level
  • 20 months old: no systematic behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the conclusion when researchers did a second experiment with sequential touching but then with 24 and 28 month old children?

A

24 months old: superordinate level
28 month old: basic and superordinate elvel

So superordinate level emerges earlier?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Matching to sample
19 months and 4-5 year olds

A

Good performance from 19 months onwards, perform better at basic level

4-5 year olds: more of a sorting task. You can ask questions. but had trouble with distinguishing animate from inanimate objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Quinn (2002) and Mandler (2004) said

A

Children find it easier to distinguish verhicles from animals, than dogs from horses. Superordinate level emerges first

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cab 2 day old infants already distinguish between point light displays random and a person?

A

yes!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In response to wachting biological motion displays, children between what ages showed no age related differences?

A

7-13 years old

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

is sensitivity to biological motion related to activity in…?

A

social brain areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What can we conclude from a study with eye tracking by 14 mo that use biological motion to detect human interaction?

A

Processing biological motion might be important for socio cognitive development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Self-initiated movement test

A

Can x go up or down a hill on their own?
3-4 year olds were okay, they have a basic understanding, but they get confused with unknown animals

17
Q

what can we conclude out of the study with growing in animals?

A

3 year olds know that animals grow, but they ar eunsure whether artefacts do
5 year old know that animals grow and artefacts do not

so 5 year olds are better able to distinguish animate from inanimate things

18
Q

shared core properties study, what can we conclude about what children know of the inside?

A

Children made errors, but were not random. they knew how to distinguish between artifactial andnatural!

19
Q

Anthropocentrism

A