Lecture 5 - Theories & Diversity of Language Development Flashcards

1
Q

What are the internal and external factors involved in language development?

A
  • Internal: Biological and cognitive factors (e.g., genes, brain development)
  • External: Environmental input and social context (Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Model, 1979)
  • Language development is shaped by their interaction over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Model (1979) in relation to language development?

A
  • This model views development as influenced by multiple environmental systems interacting with biology over time
  • It highlights that language development depends not only on genetics but also on the quality of linguistic and social input
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the significance of the FOXP2 gene in language research?

A
  • Discovered through the KE family with speech and language impairments (Fisher et al.)
    FOXP2 is a transcription factor, affecting 1000 other genes
  • It is not a “language gene” but is crucial for motor sequencing (e.g., coordinating speech movements)
  • Found in birds (linked to song learning), mice (motor control), and humans (speech deficits in KE family)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does FOZP2 research suggest about language development?

A
  • Supports nature (innate ability) view (Pinker), but..
  • Also shows domain-general functions (e.g., rhythm perception, fine motor control), supporting a broader learning model (Gopnik)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the research on Kanzi and Chaser reveal about animal communication?

A
  • Kanzi the bonobo: Used symbols and gestures to communicate; showed some understanding of grammar
  • Chaser the border collie (Kaminski et al., 2004): Learned >1000 object names but lacked categorical generalisation (treated each word as a unique label)
  • Highlights key differences between human and non-human language learning (e.g., abstraction, generativity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does the Swiss army knife metaphor (Cosmides & Tooby, 1994) represent in developmental psychology? What idea does it support?

A
  • It illustrates the idea of domain-specific cognitive modules, each adapted for a particular function
  • In language, it supports the idea that the infant brain may be pre-specified for language processing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do adult neuropsychological models support modularity?

A
  • Adults: Specific deficits (e.g., agrammatism, prosopagnosia) support brain modularity
  • Children: Dissociations in genetic disorders (e.g., SLI vs. Williams Syndrome) suggest innate, distinct modules for language and other abilites
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was revealed in the case of the man with hydrocephalus (Feuillet et al., 2007)?

A
  • Despite having severely reduced brain tissue, he had a functional life and verbal IQ of 85
  • Suggests neuroplasticity and the brain’s ability to adapt functionally over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the major stages of brain development? (Thompson. & Nelson, 2001)?

A
  • Neurulation: 18-24 prenatal days
  • Cell migration: Birth to 2 years
  • Myelination: Begins prenatally (-2 months). and continues until 10 years
  • Synaptogenesis: Begins prenatally, peaks at 2 years, continues into adolescence
  • Neurogenesis in hippocampus: From conception to adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the language and cognitive profiles of individuals with Williams Syndrome (WS)?

A
  • Caused by the deletion of 26 genes at 7q11.23
  • Language abilities: Relatively proficient
  • Visuospatial, numerical, and problem-solving abilities: Significantly impaired
  • Social cognition: Often relatively strong
  • Demonstrates genetic dissociation: Language may be spared despite global cognitive impairment (pinker, 1999)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does the dynamic developmental approach suggest about WS? (Karmiloff-Smith, 1998)

A
  • Development in WS is atypical from the outset, with brain volume, structure, and chemistry all altered
  • It is not a normal system with isolated defects: developmental pathways are different, leading to cascading effects.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can non-linguistic factors impact language development?

A
  • Includes: Motor skills, memory, attention, intention understanding, pattern recognition
  • Bradshaw et al. (2022): Example of motor-sitting cascade - motor milestones affect caregiver interaction, which affects language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some examples of environmental effects on language development?

A
  • Genie (severe deprivation)
  • Deaf children of hearing parents not exposed to sign language
  • 30 million word gap by age 3 (Hart & Ridley, 1995): High-income children hear 2x more words than low-income peers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Johnson & Newport (1989) find about second language acquisition? How did they do it?

A
  • Studied Korean/Chinese speakers who learned English at different ages
  • Before age 7: Native-like grammar
  • After age 11: Gradual decline in grammatical accuracy
  • Supports the Sensitive Period Hypothesis (biological window for optimal language learning)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the language profile of children with Down syndrome?

A
  • Lower MLU (mean length of utterance) than typically developing peers
  • D’Souza et al.: Deficits in expressive/receptive language relative to motor and visual skills
  • Often have greater difficulty with syntax and morphology
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How does parental mental health impact with language development in children with Down syndrome?

A
  • D’Souza et al., 2020: Higher parental depression correlates with lower expressive vocabulary in children
  • Highlights interaction of internal and external factors