Lecture 5 - Information Processing and Social Context Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Traits of Stage Theory

A

Qualitative differences between stages
Can only move forward, can’t skip
Must pass certain thresholds to progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did Piaget’s stage theory fail?

A

There was a lack of thought processes to apply to the principles (only one attribute explored at a time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Criticisms of Piaget

A

Superficial changes in design can affect results
Success at younger ages challenges his theory
The experiments may not measure the target cognitive ability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Information Processing Approach

A

Children fail these tasks because of other cognitive memory limitations (memory, problem-solving, attention, metacognition).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Limitations that can effect children’s problem solving

A

Encoding (don’t encode appropriate info), computational (don’t have LTM strategies), retrieval (retrieve inappropriate strategy), storage, work-space (working memory restrictions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Piaget and Inhelder (1951) - Mountains task

A

The child is given a demonstration of 3 mountains and asked to describe the doll’s point of view. Four year olds always described what they could see whereas 7-8 year olds understood the task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Brainerd (1983)

A

The reason younger children were less successful in the mountains task was due to information processing limitations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Vurpillot (1968)

A

Spot the difference task - 3-5 year olds only examined some and 6-9 year olds looked at all the windows for a difference.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Miller and Seier (1994)

A

3-4 year olds opened all the boxes to spot the difference while 9-10 year olds focused on appropriate boxes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Roebers et al (2010) - Experiment

A

Comparing 7-8 year olds with 9-10 year olds on eye tracking test
• Baseline and critical trials
• Recognition test: asked whether they’d seen an image before
• Distractibility test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Roebers et al (2010) - Results

A

Similar pattern in both age goups
• Looked more overall at task relevant stimuli

Younger children more affected by distractors

Evidence for continuous development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Encoding strategies

A

Rehearsal, organisation, elaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rehearsal

A

Mental repetition of information (older children apply strategy more effectively)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Organisation

A

Grouping information together (10 years and older organise more effectively)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elaboration

A

Making associations. Example: 2 words to remember, combine into image or sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Kreutzer et al (1975)

A

All 10 year olds were able to come up with an effective retrieval strategy to help the boy remember the puppy. Only 1/2 of 5 year olds could do the same.

17
Q

Kobasigawa (1974)

A

Participants learnt 24 images. Shown 8 cue cards with categories. Older children used cue cards as aid while younger children used them less systematically.

18
Q

Metacognition (Flavell et al, 1970)

A

More aware of memory capacity with age – younger children unrealistic about number of items can recall.

19
Q

Usefulness of memory strategies (Ringel and Springer, 1980)

A

More aware of usefulness of memory strategies – older children able to come up with more and better memory aids than younger

20
Q

Constructive memory

A

Children can infer using: scripts (sequence of actions appropriate for a specific context) and schema (what is known about a scene, place and object

21
Q

Scripts and schemas experiments

A
  • Nelson and Gruendel (1981) – restaurant script

* Blades and Banham (1990) – kitchen schema

22
Q

Chi (1978) - Children vs adults

A

Children better at remembering chess positions than adults.
Adults are better at remembering digits
Experience plays a role as experienced chess players are better than the children.

23
Q

Vygotsky (1934)

A

Cognitive processes are built by the adults helping the child learn. Culture and language are important.

24
Q

Zone of Proximal Development

A
  • Difference between actual performance and potential performance
  • How the child learns with help of others and at a level beyond existing skill (but not too far)
25
Q

Language and Thought

A

• Through language that the child develops as learner and thinker
• Importance of the external monologue
Transition from language as tool for communication to a tool for thought
Help organise and plan behaviour
Internalised to become inner speech – 7 years
• Contrast to Piaget – saw monologue as evidence of egocentrism

26
Q

Bruner and Scaffolding (how knowledge is passed from expert to child)

A
  • Recruitment: engage interest of child
  • Reduction of degrees of freedom: reduce number of acts required, simplify
  • Direction maintenance: keep motivation up
  • Marking critical features: highlight relevant features
  • Demonstration: modelling solutions
27
Q

Animals and cultures

A

Many animals socially learn and some exhibit cultures and traditions - so cultures are not as complex and there’s no evidence for cumulative culture

28
Q

Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis (Hermann et al, 2007)

A

Humans have evolved social-cognitive skills (example is theory of mind, social learning, communication, cooperation, imitation, teaching)

29
Q

Csibra and Gergely (2009)

A

Children are primed to attend to demonstrator’s cues while learning.

30
Q

Lyons et al (2011)

A

Children copy both relevant and irrelevant features while copying