Lecture 2 - Object Concept and Mental Representations Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Object permanence definition

A

Objects:
Continue to exist when out of sight
Retains spatial and physical properties
Subject to physical laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sensorimotor Stage (Piaget, 1936)

A
  1. 0-24 months
  2. Learns about world through actions and sensory information
  3. Learns to differentiate self from the environment
  4. Start to understand causality, and form internal mental representations
  5. Object permanence attained at 12 months, full internal representations by 18-24 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Substages of sensorimotor stage

A

Reflex, primary circular reactions, secondary circular reactions, coordination of secondary circular reactions, tertiary circular reactions, internal representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reflex activity substage

A

Practice innate reflexes for example sucking and looking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Primary circular reactions substage

A

Simple behaviours derived from basic reflexes, start repeating behaviour, focuses on body, no differentiation between self and outside world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Secondary circular reactions substage

A

Starts to focus on objects, begin to change surroundings intentionally and establish connection between body movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Coordination of secondary circular reactions substage

A

Engage with objects using a variety of actions, combining actions to achieve goals – still makes A-not-B errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tertiary circular reactions substage

A

Still repetitive or circle behaviours and discover the properties of objects and the environment, understand objects through trial and error, improvements in problem solving and still lack internal representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Internal representation substage

A

Baby now has a mental representation of the world to solve problems insightfully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A-not-B error

A

A child may reach for a hidden object where it has always been, yet still reach there even when they see the toy hidden somewhere else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Object permanence ages

A

Babies begin to search for objects around 6-9 months but still have A-not-B error until 12 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happens at substage 6? (internal representation)

A

Copy behaviour after a delay and shows goal directed and structured planning behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Piaget Method critique

A

Observational methods, often with own children
Quantitative but experimental data rare
“Clinical method” rather than standardised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Confounds to Piaget’s substages

A

Motor coordination and motor planning deficits (inability to perform coordinated actions)
Memory deficits
Communication – biased by cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Younger infants could show more evidence if…

A

Simplify procedure in experimental studies
Change procedure
Change the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Smith and Thalan (2003)

A

When children were stood upright before the A-not-B part of the task, they solved it at 10 months old

17
Q

Butterworth (1977) Conditions

A

3 conditions: normal A-not-B, covered but visible object, visible and uncovered object

18
Q

Butterworth (1977) Findings

A

Errors in all 3 conditions even when object is uncovered but visible (reflects lack of communication, not necessarily lack of object permanence)

19
Q

Bower and Wishart, 1972

A

Shown object within reach, lights turned off infants as young as five months will grasp for out of sight objects

20
Q

Bower (1982)

A

Infants a few months old, shown object, screen moved in front of object, then returned to original position.

Heart rate increased when object disappeared illogically

21
Q

Baillargeon et al (1985)

A

Babies showed more surprise at the impossible event. They only showed surprise at the normal event if the impossible was shown first due to violation of expectation

22
Q

Baillargeon et al (1985) Conclusions

A

Infants as young as 5 months showed object permanence

23
Q

Clifton et al (1991)

A

Presented 6m olds with small (required 1 hand grasp) and large (2 hand grasp) objects
Each object made identifying sound
Infants made appropriate grip to reach for objects in darkness
Authors conclude this is based on mental representations

24
Q

Martenjuk et al, 1987

A

Differences in motor patterns in adults for planned actions

25
Q

Willatts (1989)

A
  • Toy out of reach on a cloth
  • Cloth and toy blocked by barrier
  • 9 month old children performed sequence of actions to get toy
  • Many succeeded on the first event (novel, planned actions, mental representation of the world used to organise behaviour
26
Q

Meltzoff and Moore (1994) - 6 week olds

A

Some infants saw adult make facial gesture, some saw neutral expression.
Day later, those who saw gesture were more likely to perform it to a neutral face

27
Q

Meltzoff (1995) - 14 month to 16 month year olds

A

Experimenter performed series of actions with objects.

Both ages more likely to reproduce observed actions than those who did not see them (even after a four month delay)