Lecture 4 - When perception goes wrong Flashcards
Fraser Spiral illusion?
- look at diagram
- a series of concentric circles
- misaligned parts (black and white strands within the circles ) distort the perception of the regular pattern (circles)
Jastrow illusion?
- look at diagram
- objets with a longer radius appear to be shorter
Irradiation illusion?
- look at diagram
- white square appears to be bigger but they are actually the same size
- light areas appear to be larger than dark areas because light from a white region irradiates adjacent dark regions
What if the image on the retina is ambiguous?
- the retinal image doesn’t change but we perceive different objects
- the same feature can be different parts of different objects
Erroneous perception with visual illusions?
what we perceive is not always what is represented on our retina
Equivocal perception with ambiguous figures?
we perceive different objects from the same retinal image
What did Gibson say?
such illusions and figures are carefully constructed to mislead us and do not exist in the real world, they have no ecological validity
What are some examples of real world visual illusions?
- moon illusion
-> the moon appears larger when it is close to the horizon as compared to when it is high up in the sky - waterfall illusion
-> motion aftereffect: after observation of motion in one direction (waterfall for 30-60 seconds) stationary objects (e.g. trees) appear to move in the opposite direction - wagon wheel effect:
-> stroboscopic effect: a moving wheel appears to stand still or move in opposite direction to its true rotation
Ambiguous retinal images - the inverse projection problem?
- A 3D object is represented on a 2D (retinal) surface
- The same pattern of light on the retina can be caused by different objects
- The real-world 3D object cannot be derived from the retinal image
The fact that we experience perceptual illusions and ambiguity tells us what?
- perception is more than just sensation
- sensory information from the retina is insufficient, perception is a matter of interpretation
what do top down accounts of perception say?
perception is an interaction between sensation and cognition
Richard Gregory 1970?
- came up with the constructive theory of perception
- goal = explain how we attach meaning to sensory input
- perception = interpretation of sensation
- basic idea:
-> perception is indirect and a constructive process of hypothesis testing
-> for ambiguous figures 2 equally plausible hypotheses are established
-> as perception is based on individual factors, incorrect hypotheses can be formed, which lead to perceptual errors
Evaluation of the constructive theory of perception?
(+) Theoretical account (tries to explain how perception and object recognition work)
(+) Is able to explain perceptual failure (visual illusion) and ambiguity
(-) Cannot explain why illusions persist even when they are known
(-) Suggests that perception is not effortless (active and continuous hypothesis testing)
(-) doesn’t often match our subjective experience
Gestalt psychologists?
- Two light flashes presented in a rapid alternating fashion create illusory movement
- Modern version of the phi phenomenon: Apparent motion induced by sequentially presented static stimuli
- The sensory experience (two light flashes) is not sufficient to explain the perceptual experience (illusion of movement)
- ‘The whole is more than the sum of its parts’
How do we achieve the whole (the object)?
- by perceptual organisation such as:
-> grouping
-> segmentation