Lecture 4. Screening for Disease Flashcards
Because diagnosis a population-level problem, what do we need to know?
How individual values are distributed (among populations and within a population)
What is a case definition?
A set of criteria used to decide whether an individual has the disease of interest
What are case definitions a combination of?
Clinical signs (e.g. diarrhoea, rash, rapid breathing, broken limb)
Diagnostic tests (one or many) e.g. bacterial culture, ELISA, X-ray, MRI scan, PCR
What is the aim of defining cases?
To create one unique set of criteria that defines a disease with 100% accuracy in an individual on every occasion
Also make sure every country defines diseases in the same way
What are the limitations to case definition?
Misclassification - diagnostic tests are often not 100% accurate
Often not one unique set of criteria (required when multiple infections occur together – e.g diarrhoea – even if Salmonella typhimurium is identified we cannot be sure these are no other causes involved)
Sometimes no known cause e.g TSEs (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, prions)
If case definition relies on post-mortem findings, can only make the diagnosis after death
Definitions, symptoms etc. can all change
What limit the use/development of perfect case definitions?
Scientific knowledge
Time
Money
What is epidemiology used to make decisions about?
Groups not individuals
A case definition might be good enough despite errors depending on the purpose
What do we do when we know how a test is wrong?
Account for the error when estimating incidence and prevalence
What is a dichotomous result?
Can only be positive or negative (e.g pregnancy or covid)
What is a true positive result (a)?
Have disease and have positive test result
What is a false negative result (c)?
Have disease but have a negative test result
What is a false positive result (b)?
No disease but have a positive test result
What is a true negative result (d)?
No disease and have a negative test result
Ideally, which groups do we want all samples to fall into?
a and d
Since we don’t really know who really has the disease, how do we evaluate the new diagnostic tests?
We evaluate new diagnostic tests by comparing them to a gold standard test (=best available test for disease, often invasive)
What is the sensitivity (Se) of a test?
The probability of a positive test result given the presence of the disease - How good is the test at identifying diseased
a/(a+c)
What is the specificity (Sp) of a test?
The probability of a negative test result given the absence of the disease - How good is the test at identifying non-diseased
Properties of a specificity test shouldn’t change
d/(b+d)