Lecture 3. Causality and Error Flashcards

1
Q

In a causal diagram, what do solid arrows represent?

A

A causal relationship between two variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In a causal diagram, what do dashed lines represent?

A

Not a causal relationship, but a relationship driven by an unmeasured risk factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What can causal relationships be?

A

Necessary and/or sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is an examples of a necessary and sufficient causal relationship?

A

e.g disease if and only if S. typhi pathogen is present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an examples of a necessary but not sufficient causal relationship?

A

e.g dietary factors enable S. typhi to adhere to the intestinal wall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an examples of a sufficient but not necessary causal relationship?

A

e.g. Shigellosis may also cause disease or influence severity (might have the S. typhi pathogen and not have the disease)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Hill’s Criteria?

A

The seven tests for causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the seven tests for causality?

A

Strength of association
Dose-response relationship
Correct temporal relationship
Independent or recognised confounders
Consistency with other knowledge
Biologically plausible
Reversible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is strength of association?

A

High Relative Risk or Odds Ratio – these are measures of association and estimate the increase or decrease in exposure/disease in a cohort or case control study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are examples of confident and non confident association strengths?

A

More confident: smoking increased the risk lung cancer by a factor of 22
Less confident: Oral contraceptives increased the risk of breast cancer by 1.2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is dose-response relationship?

A

The disease increases as the exposure increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an example of dose-response relationship?

A

The longer duration of smoking and higher daily number of cigarettes, the greater the reduction in life expectancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a correct temporal relationship?

A

The exposure occurs before the disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What study type are the best and worst at informing correct temporal relationships?

A

Easier to establish the sequence of events in a cohort study (prospective) than in case-control study due to potential imprecision in records
Cross-sectional studies do not inform correct temporal relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does independent of recognised confounders mean?

A

Once known ‘causes’ are accounted for there is still a significant association

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of independence of recognised factors?

A

Asbestos increases the risk of lung cancer, independent of smoking cigarettes

17
Q

What does consistency with other knowledge mean?

A

If a study is the third or fourth to report the same findings then one can be more convinced that the relationship is causal

18
Q

What are examples of consistencies with other knowledge?

A

There are many studies suggesting a link between smoking and cancer
Early studies on the risk of breast cancer following oral contraception use varied in findings

19
Q

What does biologically plausible mean?

A

Coherence with the current body of biological literature
i.e. The association makes sense with other sources of data (makes sense mechanistically within the disease)

20
Q

What does reversible mean within Hill’s criteria?

A

Remove the risk factor and there is a change in the outcome

21
Q

What is an example of reversibility within Hill’s criteria?

A

If you stop smoking, life expectancy increases again

22
Q

When might a study have insufficient power?

A

Failure to detect an association between two variables that is truly present in population

23
Q

What are measurement errors and what do they result in?

A

Random, measurement error results in the dependent and/or independent variables being misclassified, but not systematically. Result is reduced likelihood of detecting a significant effect.

24
Q

What do random errors result in?

A

Measurement error
Results in a reduced likelihood of detecting an effect

25
Q

What does bias result in?

A

Results in misclassification, but occurs in a systematic way
Bias potentially modifies the association

26
Q

What are the four types of bias?

A

Selection Bias
Recall Bias
Funding Bias
Bias due to confounding

27
Q

What is selection bias?

A

Individuals are not representative of the population from which they are drawn because they were not randomly selected to be in a study

28
Q

What study types are at risk of selection bias?

A

All of them

29
Q

When does selection bias occur?

A

The stage of recruiting or retaining participants

30
Q

What are the three types of population?

A

Target population (generalise to)
Source population (who do you invite)
Study population (who do we sample)

31
Q

What is an example of selection bias in a case-control study?

A

1929 Study of 7,500 autopsy records
Hypothesis: Tuberculosis protected against cancer
Cases & Controls = 816 cancer cases (autopsies with malignant tumours) and 816 non-cancer cases (autopsises without cancer tumours) at John Hopkins Hospital
Lower rate of TB in cancer patients: 6.6% of patients with cancer had TB; 16.3% without cancer had TB.
Concluded TB was protective against cancer

32
Q

What are the three common and important types of selection bias (ranked in descending order of how reliable they are)?

A

1) Case control studies - Selection of cases or controls on the basis of an exposure which is associated with the disease in question
2) Randomised Clinical Trails - Non-random allocation of patients to treatment groups in a clinical trial -Younger people, or sick people are offered the “new” drug
3) Cohort Studies - Loss to follow up (when one group is less likely to come back)

33
Q

What is information/recall bias?

A

Patients with a disease recall their histories differently from patients without the disease

34
Q

What are examples of information/recall bias?

A

A diagnosis of liver cancer might influence the recall of the amount of alcohol consumed in the past
Women generally report fewer sexual partners than men

35
Q

What is funding bias?

A

It is very important when doing work that the results are impartial of the sponsors
When reading papers check who are the sponsors

36
Q

What is bias due to confounders?

A

Confounding occurs when a variable is associated with a dependent and independent variable
A problem for observational studies
Well-recognised potential confounders are age, sex, social class, race
Most confounders are not measured because they are unknown (If we measured and accounted for it, then it isn’t a confounder)

37
Q

What is an appropriate study design?

A

Type of study
Quantify power and significance and estimate required sample size
Measure the confounder and include in the analysis

38
Q

What can ignoring confounders lead to?

A

Identifying associations that are false or failing to identify true associations