Lecture 3. Causality and Error Flashcards
In a causal diagram, what do solid arrows represent?
A causal relationship between two variables
In a causal diagram, what do dashed lines represent?
Not a causal relationship, but a relationship driven by an unmeasured risk factor
What can causal relationships be?
Necessary and/or sufficient
What is an examples of a necessary and sufficient causal relationship?
e.g disease if and only if S. typhi pathogen is present
What is an examples of a necessary but not sufficient causal relationship?
e.g dietary factors enable S. typhi to adhere to the intestinal wall
What is an examples of a sufficient but not necessary causal relationship?
e.g. Shigellosis may also cause disease or influence severity (might have the S. typhi pathogen and not have the disease)
What is Hill’s Criteria?
The seven tests for causality
What are the seven tests for causality?
Strength of association
Dose-response relationship
Correct temporal relationship
Independent or recognised confounders
Consistency with other knowledge
Biologically plausible
Reversible
What is strength of association?
High Relative Risk or Odds Ratio – these are measures of association and estimate the increase or decrease in exposure/disease in a cohort or case control study.
What are examples of confident and non confident association strengths?
More confident: smoking increased the risk lung cancer by a factor of 22
Less confident: Oral contraceptives increased the risk of breast cancer by 1.2
What is dose-response relationship?
The disease increases as the exposure increases
What is an example of dose-response relationship?
The longer duration of smoking and higher daily number of cigarettes, the greater the reduction in life expectancy
What is a correct temporal relationship?
The exposure occurs before the disease
What study type are the best and worst at informing correct temporal relationships?
Easier to establish the sequence of events in a cohort study (prospective) than in case-control study due to potential imprecision in records
Cross-sectional studies do not inform correct temporal relationship
What does independent of recognised confounders mean?
Once known ‘causes’ are accounted for there is still a significant association