Lecture 4: Psychology of Sale - Omega Strategies Flashcards
persuasion knowledge (PK) model
• PK develops over time • PK has (mainly) negative consequences • PK determines how skilful people cope with a persuasion attempt
examples of resistance
“I don’t like it”
“I won’t do it”
“I don’t believe it”
three forms of resistance
- reactance
- skepticism
- inertia
if there wasn’t _______ , there would be no need for _______
if there wasn’t resistance , there would be no need for persuasion
what are omega strategies about
reducing resistance
reactance
resistance to the influence
• Persuasion can threaten feelings of freedom of
choice
• Results in motivation to resist the influence attempt (reactance)
• Can result in opposite behaviour
• Reactance is caused be the influence attempt itself and not its content
skepticism
resistance to the proposal
- Focus lies merely on the content of the persuasion attempt
- Skepticism about the proposed change
elaboration likelihood model in short
central and peripheral routes to attitude change
inertia
resistance to change
- Hard to change as not related to the content of persuasion
- Resistance with the aim to preserve the status quo and avoid change
- Focused on the past
- No active consideration of the persuasion attempt
tactics to reducing reactance- general
• Don’t activate it in the first place
• Remember, reactance = perceived threat to freedom of choice
• Degree of reactance felt depends on:
1. Number and importance of freedoms threatened
2. Blatancy or coerciveness of the threat
tactics to reducing reactance: specific
- minimise the request
- depersonalize the request
- the power of yes
- acknowledging resistance
- providing choices
minimize the request
- Minimising the request decreases reactance
- Incremental change is easier to achieve than abrupt change
- Smaller requests elicit less reactance
- Cf. Foot-in-the-door technique and “even a penny will help” technique
depersonalise the request
• Reactance to an influence attempt is rather personal
• “I don’t want to be influenced by you!”
• Depersonalisation of the request takes away this
personal component and therefore decreases reactance
How?
• Disavow personal authorship of the request
(“it’s the manager’s policy”)
• Deny any ad hominem element in the request
(“it’s the same deal we give everybody”)
• Storytelling
the power of yes
- Limiting freedom of choice is a “no”
- Always saying yes (or avoiding no’s) is an effective tactic to avoid reactance
- “Yes and” instead of “No, instead”
- Telling someone what to do raises less reactance than telling them what not to do
acknowledging resistance
- Focuses on already raised resistance
* Acknowledging resistance dramatically increases compliance