Lecture 4: Psychology of Sale - Omega Strategies Flashcards

1
Q

persuasion knowledge (PK) model

A
• PK develops over time
• PK has (mainly) negative
consequences
• PK determines how skilful
people cope with a persuasion attempt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

examples of resistance

A

“I don’t like it”
“I won’t do it”
“I don’t believe it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

three forms of resistance

A
  1. reactance
  2. skepticism
  3. inertia
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

if there wasn’t _______ , there would be no need for _______

A

if there wasn’t resistance , there would be no need for persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are omega strategies about

A

reducing resistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

reactance

A

resistance to the influence

• Persuasion can threaten feelings of freedom of
choice
• Results in motivation to resist the influence attempt (reactance)
• Can result in opposite behaviour
• Reactance is caused be the influence attempt itself and not its content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

skepticism

A

resistance to the proposal

  • Focus lies merely on the content of the persuasion attempt
  • Skepticism about the proposed change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

elaboration likelihood model in short

A

central and peripheral routes to attitude change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

inertia

A

resistance to change

  • Hard to change as not related to the content of persuasion
  • Resistance with the aim to preserve the status quo and avoid change
  • Focused on the past
  • No active consideration of the persuasion attempt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

tactics to reducing reactance- general

A

• Don’t activate it in the first place
• Remember, reactance = perceived threat to freedom of choice
• Degree of reactance felt depends on:
1. Number and importance of freedoms threatened
2. Blatancy or coerciveness of the threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

tactics to reducing reactance: specific

A
  1. minimise the request
  2. depersonalize the request
  3. the power of yes
  4. acknowledging resistance
  5. providing choices
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

minimize the request

A
  • Minimising the request decreases reactance
  • Incremental change is easier to achieve than abrupt change
  • Smaller requests elicit less reactance
  • Cf. Foot-in-the-door technique and “even a penny will help” technique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

depersonalise the request

A

• Reactance to an influence attempt is rather personal
• “I don’t want to be influenced by you!”
• Depersonalisation of the request takes away this
personal component and therefore decreases reactance

How?
• Disavow personal authorship of the request
(“it’s the manager’s policy”)
• Deny any ad hominem element in the request
(“it’s the same deal we give everybody”)
• Storytelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the power of yes

A
  • Limiting freedom of choice is a “no”
  • Always saying yes (or avoiding no’s) is an effective tactic to avoid reactance
  • “Yes and” instead of “No, instead”
  • Telling someone what to do raises less reactance than telling them what not to do
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

acknowledging resistance

A
  • Focuses on already raised resistance

* Acknowledging resistance dramatically increases compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

providing choices

A
  • Offering only one alternative focuses all feelings of resistance on that alternative
  • In case of several alternative, resistance can be satisfied by one of them, helping the other (s)
  • Having a choice provides a sense of control (more freedom = less reactance)
17
Q

Tactics to deal with skepticism

A
  1. Guarantees
  2. change the comparison
  3. reframe the proposal
18
Q

guarantees

A
  • No matter what the customer does, they cannot lose
  • Skepticism in sales = “is it the right thing to do/buy?”
  • Guarantees can remove any doubt
  • They imply high quality/reliability
  • Only a small percentage of sales are actually returned
19
Q

change the comparison

A
  • Every judgement involves an implicit comparison
  • It is often easier to change behaviour by changing the comparison than by changing the offer
  • Efficacy 0f sales prices build on this principle
20
Q

reframe the proposal

A
• Casting new meaning to an
alternative
• Remember loss and gain
frames
--> People want to avoid losses
21
Q

tactics to deal with inertia

A
  1. disrupt

2. increase self-efficacy

22
Q

disrupting inertia

A

• Inertia results in disengagement and
disinterest
=
• Disrupt inertia through unusual and confusing messages

  • Increases motivation for engagement
  • Confusion can occupy a person’s resistance
23
Q

increase self-efficacy

A
  • “the judgement of how well one can execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations”
  • Inertia is often rooted in the belief that one can not achieve a certain goal
  • Fear of choices, unknown, or transitions
  • Increasing self efficacy/confidence decreases inertia
24
Q

conclusions about resistance and omega strategies

A

• There are three different types of resistance
➡ Reactance
➡ Skepticism
➡ Inertia
• Different types of resistance require different types of tactics (omega)
• Omega strategies are relatively cheap
• Alpha strategies work because they overwhelm resistance
• Omega strategies work because they take away resistance
• Omega strategies need desire and reluctance to be high to work