Lecture 4: philosophy of Kuhn and social science Flashcards
definition paradigm
universally recognized scientific achievement that, for a time, provide model problems and solutions for a community of practitioners
difference normal science and paradigm change
normal science: - constant but small changes - occurs during stable periods in between moment of crisis/revolution paradigm change: - drastic shift away from normality
meaning puzzle-solving (Kuhn)
- used in normal science
- aren’t deep problems with the paradigm
- reinforce the existing paradigm
3 phenomena that aren’t crisis-inducing (doesn’t cause a paradigm shift)
- some new phenomena fits in, but isn’t destructive to existing scientific paradigm
- some new phenomena isn’t previously known and there fills in a new theoretical space
- some new phenomena might link groups of lower theories together
definition anomaly
is a puzzle that resists a solution
- all paradigms face some anomalies at a given time
- tend to accumulate
- if anomalies cause researchers to lose faith in their field: a crisis ensues
characteristics of paradigm changes
- paradigm choice is made by the community of scientists
- involves a transfer of allegiance of scientists
- it’s a conversion experience witch can’t be forced
- accomplished by persuasive argumentation, not by evidence or proof
- it isn’t cumulative: new paradigm replaces the previous one
opinion popper vs kuhn on paradigms
popper:
- good scientist is always open-minded to all issues in a field
- scientific progress is cumulative
kuhn:
- scientists should take fundamentals of paradigm as given so progress can be made on the details
- scientific is cumulative WITHIN the paradigm
Kuhn’s critics on Popper:
- ???
three interpretations of ‘paradigm’
Paradigm 1 –Single dominant framework (i.e., world view)
Paradigm 2 –Distinct scientific community with own institutional foundation
Paradigm 3 –Different schools of thought, theoretical perspectives within larger community