Lecture 4 Learning, Cognitive & Humanist Approaches Flashcards

1
Q

Pavlov and Skinner

A

Classical conditioning Pavlov
UCS -> UCR
CS -> CR
Operant conditioning Skinner
Consequences of behaviour important: reinforcement, reward, punishment
Friendly person has been reinforced for being friendly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Stimulus-Response Model (Dollard and Miller, 1941, 1950)

A

-Integrates learning principles with Freudian theory
-Acknowledges impact of unconscious-comprised of ‘unlabelled’ drives/cues
-Personality composed largely of learned habits-associations between S-R
-Primary drives
-Secondary drives-Learnt (coping with primary drives) e.g. regular mealtimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Social Learning Theory Overview (Bandura, 1978/1989)

A

-Do internal or external forces control our behaviour?
-Interacting factors in reciprocal determinism
Person Factors
Environmental Factors
Behavioural Factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bobo doll study (1963)

A

Learn to become us and behave as we do via observational learning and modelling
Simple, similar, type of behaviour
*Attributes of the observer
*Consequences of imitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Social Learning Theory Explained

A

Internal self-regulatory processes
Self-efficacy as a self-regulatory
process
– Belief in ability to obtain a desired outcome
(Bandura, 1989; 1994)
– High self-efficacy and success (Bandura, 1977)
Increasing self-efficacy ratings – Personal experience
– Vicarious experience
– Participant modelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Locus of control (Rotter, 1966)

A

-Behavioural prediction in specific situations
(Behaviour Potential = Reinforcement value X Expectancy)
-Summary: to predict behaviour in a particular situation, we need to know the
options & the possible outcomes the individual sees related to each option
-Novel situations lead to generalised
expectancies
– External (locus of control)
– Internal (locus of control)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Internal and External LOC

A

Stable personality characteristic
Internal locus of control
– Feel in control, empowered to change
External locus of control
– Feel powerless, helpless to change things
and dependent on others
Locus of control correlates with
anxiety
– More externals than internals among individuals
with MHPs (Lefcourt, 1992)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mischel’s ‘Concerns’

A
  • Stability of traits across contexts
  • e.g. confidence in one situation, but…
  • Interpretation of scores
    from self-report measures
  • low relatedness; low predictive value
  • Dynamic personality “system”
  • Cognitive Affective Processing System (CAPS)
  • Composed of Cognitive Affective Units (CAUs)
  • e.g. representation of self, others, expectations beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Mischel and Shoda’s (1995) model called?

A

Cognitive-Affective Processing System (CAPS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Theory of personal constructs (Kelly, 1955)

A

Views on human nature
– ‘Scientists’, generating hypotheses from subjective data
– Each person’s ‘…processes are psychologically channelized by the ways in which he anticipates events’ (1955, p.46)

Personal constructs
Superordinate/subordinate constructs
– Constructive alternativism
– 11 corollaries
– Operation of the interpretative processes
creating our personal constructs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is constructive alternativitism?

A

individuals perceive the world through their own unique set of cognitive constructs or mental representations, which they use to interpret and make sense of their experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Kelly’s 11 Corollaries

A

Range of convenience
Communality
Organisation
Individuality - Personal constructions - aggressive vs assertive
Dichotomy - nature of personal constructs 0 good and not bad, allows for constructive alternativitism
Construction
Modulation
Choice
Fragmentation
Experience
Sociality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rational-Emotive Behaviour Theory/Therapy (Ellis, 1958)

A

Central to Ellis’s theory (1976)
– Humankind is innately rational/irrational
– Two goals: i) To stay alive ii) To be happy

Rational Behaviour
– Helps individuals to achieve basic goals

Irrational Behaviour
– Prevents individuals achieving basic goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rational-Emotive Behaviour Theory/Therapy 2

A

Stresses subjective nature of
experience

Underlying concept
– ‘Men are disturbed not by things,
but by their view of things’
(Epictetus)

Human beings have free will
(Ellis, 1958; 1978)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The Basic REBT Model (Ellis, 1979)

A

A represents the activating event
B represents the clients’ belief system
C represents the emotional and behavioural
consequences that occur as a result
D for disputation
E for education

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Maslow and Self-Actualisation

A

Human nature & human motivation
(1954, 1965, 1968, 1970 )
– Basically good
– Innate tendencies towards
growth & development
– Weak; easily overcome by
negative environmental influences

Hierarchy of needs (1970)
– Emerged from early work on animal needs

17
Q

Hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1970)

A

Self-actualisation -> maximizing talents, finding meaning, achieving peace with self

Esteem needs -> self-perception, perception of others…

Belongingness needs -> acceptance, being needed…

Safety needs -> routine, boundaries, personal safety…

Physiological needs -> hunger, sex, sleep…

18
Q

Roger’s Theory of Personality

A

Basic principles
– Individuals play an active shaping role
– Dignity & worth of human beings (1959)
– Phenomenological “nature” of reality
– Function within a perceptual or subjective
frame of reference (1956)

Self-actualisation
– Natural tendency, present from birth
*positive growth & development
* if SAT is not blocked (1959/1977)

19
Q

Rogers’ 2

A

Organismic valuing (1959)
Positive regard/Positive self-regard
Conditional PR/ PSR
– Conditions of worth
Self-concept;
– Real self/Ideal self
Incongruity
Defence Mechanisms

20
Q

Rogers’ Person-Centred Therapy

A
  • The aim of person-centred counselling
  • Core conditions (1959)
21
Q

Core conditions of Rogers’ therapy

A
  1. Both the client and the therapist must be in psychological contact
  2. The client is in a state of incongruence and feels anxious about it
  3. The counsellor is congruent in the relationship
  4. The therapist experiences unconditional positive regard for the client
  5. The therapist experiences an empathic understanding of the client’s internal
    frame of reference
  6. The client perceives the counsellor’s unconditional positive regard for him/her
    and the counsellor’s empathic understanding of his/her difficulties
22
Q

Q-Sort Measurement of Self-Concept (Stephenson, 1953)

A

-A list of around 100 adjectives/short
statements describing personality attributes
-Sort into 9 categories (most and least like me)
-In relation to real self, then ideal self