Lecture 4: Decision Making Flashcards

Part 2

1
Q

how do we decision make

A
  • Realising there is a problem
  • Finding out more information
    o how much search?
  • How are alternatives evaluated?
    o Careful weighing up of ‘pros’ and ‘cons’
    o Use of quick heuristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the stages of evaluating the alternative

A

o The product alternatives a person considers compromise their evoked set.
o Members of the evoked set usually share some characteristics; we categorize them similarly.
o The way a person mentally groups or categorises products influences which alternatives he or she will consider.
o Usually we associate some brands more strongly with these categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what sets are involved in evaltating the alternative

A

evoked set: the alternatives a consumer knows about

Consideration set: the ones actually considered

Inept set: ones a consumer knows about but would not consider buying

Inert set: those not under consideration at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what are the strategic implications of product grouping (evaluation of alternatives)

A

product positioning

identifying competitoes

exemplar products

locating products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define product positioning

A

o This hinges on the marketer’s ability to convince consumers that a product should be considered within a given category.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define ‘identifying competitors’

A

o Many different product forms codo wempete for membership of a category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define ‘exemplar products’

A

o Where a product is a really good example of a category, it is more familiar to consumers and is more easily recognized and recalled.
 Popular familiar product generally seen as a good product
 This is where might start to look at price point etc..

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define ‘locating products’

A

o Product categorization can also affect consumers’ expectations regarding the places where they can locate products.
 Category that choose to put product in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are the 3 elements of the multi attribute models on which consumers usually take into evaluation

A

attributes

beliefs

importance weights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define attributes

A

those which consumers usually take into consideration when evaluating a particular product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define beliefs

A

– the extent to which a consumer thinks a brand has a particular attribute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define importance weights

A

the importance of each attribute for a consumer (this may vary considerably between individuals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the multi attribute model elements make possible

A

o Spot weaknesses in the brand profile
o Capitalise on advantages which the product already has
o Strengthen key product-attribute linkages
o Create new unique selling points if required
 Busier a market is  the more you need a unique selling point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what did Fishbein 1983 create

A

created the first, and most influential, attribute model
o Model about gap between intention to buy and actually buying
o Key concepts in diagram = intention and behaviour
- Other models have been created to improve the predictability of the model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are alternative models to improve the predictability of the multi attribute models

A

o The theory of reasoned action (Ajzen & Fishbein, 1977)

o The theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen, 1991)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

why do - Mismatches between predictions based on multi-attribute models and questionnaires arise

A

There can be differences between intentions and actual behaviour

Social pressure may change our intentions or behaviour

Models concentrate on the evaluation of the product rather than evaluating what consumers feel about buying it (e.g. if the shop is far away or unpleasant)
- Eg if the shop is far away->will you go to the shop of just buy it on amazon context is key

Models also need to include what consumers feel about websites when shopping online

Attitudes can change for a variety of reasons (e.g. culture, shopping on-line, age)
-Mismatches between predictions that come up with (conscious decisions of buying) due to above