Lecture 4: Case conceptualisation Flashcards

1
Q

psychotherapy case formulation is=

A
  • a process
  • for developing a hypothesis about,
  • and a plan to address,
  • the causes, precipitants, and maintaining influences of
  • a person’s psychological, interpersonal and behavioral problems
  • in the context of that individual’s culture and environment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

wat zijn de onderdelen van case conceptualisation model

A

problem
maintaining factors
inducing factors
predispositional factors
treatment considerations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

welke onderdelen beinvloeden de problemen & maintaining factors

A

strengths (skills, coping, personality)
Vulnerabilities
Stressors
Support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

vulnerabilities

A

pitfalls
beliefs
habits
emotionality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

support

A

what resources can you use?

social
help
activities
medication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

stressors

A

what is currently weighing on you

events
social, family
occupation
living conditions
finances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

welke dialogue gaat dit over (uit lecture 2)

A

the intersubjective dialogue, attunement to the first person perspective. interest in personal narratives and processes of meaning making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hoe meot je de DSM eigenlijk gebruiken

A

DSM 5 -> prototype conceptualisation, kijken of het specifieke individu daarbij fit. anders aanpassen naar de case conceptualisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

wat is de rationale tijdens het uitwerken van de case conceptualisation en wat zijn 3 vragen die je jezelf hierbij moet stellen

A

Working hypotheses developed in collaboration between therapist and client

  1. Credible enough?
  2. Acceptable for the client?
  3. Useful for treatment?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

multiple sources for constructing hypotheses

A

theories and research, client experience and narrative, clinical experience of therapist

individual case formulations, individualised treatment, evaluation of outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what knowledge do we have for creating valid conceptualisations?

A
  1. Diathesis-stress model
  2. Evidence-based treatments
  3. ‘Common factors’
  4. Theories and proposed mechanisms
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

diathesis-stress model

A

heritable predispositions -> genotype, temperament

early experiences -> nurture, care, trauma, deprivation

strengths and vulnerabilities -> fenotype, schemas/cognitions/attributions, neuro-endocrine, attachment style, personality)

support and stress -> social, medication, psychotherapy, daily stress, trauma, life events)

links is diathesis, rechts is stress.
boven is distal-past, onder is proximal-present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

kijken naar diathesis stress model

A

oke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

hoe gebruik je evidence based treatments

A

EBT -> prototype CC + intersubjective dialogue -> personal CC

obv research kunnen we EBTs opstellen waardoor we weten dat ‘mensen met X usually benefit from treatment Y’, en daarna bespreken met de client zelf en op hen aanpassen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

common factors

A
  • Therapeutic alliance
  • Collaboration
  • Goal consensus
  • Adapting treatment to specific client characteristics
  • Empathy
  • Promoting treatment credibility
    etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

common factors and CC

A
  • Adaptation to specific client needs and characteristics
  • A person-specific rationale why a certain therapy fits and will work
  • Validation and empathy
  • Indications for alliance ruptures to take care of
  • A shared ground for setting goals
  • A starting point for adequate collaboration
17
Q

waar gebruik je therapeutic knowledge vooral bij in CC

A

maintaining factors

18
Q

waar ben je bij inducing factors in geinteresseerd

A

wat er is gebeurd, maar ook wat dat betekende voor die persoon!!! (bv naast scheiding ook angst om alleen met het leven om te moeten gaan, andere sociale rollen, etc)

19
Q

theories die we hebben

A

behaviourism
cognitivism
schemata
psychoanalysis
mentalization
emotion-focused
attachment
body oriented
system-based

20
Q

problems =

A
  • initially indicated by the client
  • uncovered during the interview
  • indicated by other sources

behaviours, emotions, cognitions, experiences, consequences, interpersonal issues, symptoms, etc

21
Q

maintaining factors=

A

vicious cycles
interactions between problems
effects of…
- core beliefs
- coping
- emotion regulation

22
Q

inducing factors

A

how did the problems start?

  • events
  • personal context at the time (how does the client interpret this event?)
23
Q

predisposing factors

A
  • temperament
  • learning history
  • skill deficit
24
Q

treatment considerations

A

what is needed to get better?

  • request for help
  • motivation
  • intervention options
  • obstacles
25
Q

current personal context=

A

strengths (skills, coping, persoonlijkheid)
kwetsbaarheid (valkuilen, overtuigingen, gewoontes, emoties)
support (sociaal, hulp, activiteiten, medicatie)
stressors (events, sociaal, familie, werk, leefcondities, financieën)

26
Q

waarom is CC belangrijk

A

omdat we moeten nadenken over persoonlijke context, omstandigheden en ontwikkeling en doelen

27
Q

a good-working theory and rationale is supportive for the common factors that are crucial in promotoing a good treatment outcome

A

oke

28
Q

bv bij helplessness gevoelens: geen behavioural activation want deze personen hebben al negatieve cognities over hulp

A

oke

29
Q

case conceptualisation is intersubjective dialogue, interest in personal narratives and processes of meaning making

A

oke

30
Q

meestal zouden verschillende psychologen verschillende case conceptualisations hebben

A

oke