Lecture 3, selected slides Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Relative clauses

A
  • Normally (also in LSGSWE), the term is reserved for finite clauses functioning as postmodifiers
  • All relative clauses have a gap (a ’missing’ constituent) which corresponds to the noun that the relative clause modifies.

the man that my mother married D

– the gap has a grammatical function in the relative clause

the man that my mother married D

S V Od

• Many relative clauses have a relativizer. In fact, if we accept ’zero’ as a relativizer, then all relative clauses have one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The choice of relativizer

A

• Three factors influence the choice of relativizer

– The function of the gap in the relative clause

– Animacy of the modified head

– Restrictive/Non-restrictive modification

• A few examples (for more, see LSGSWE: 9.8.2)

– that:

  • used in all functions (even Adverbial)
  • used with animate/inanimate antecedents
  • usually not possible in non-restrictive relative clauses

Here is the book/man/cat that I like. (Od)

This is the gun/man that killed Liberty. (S)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gaps in relative clauses

A

Subject gap

  • the man who/that bought her lunch*
  • the car which/that was parked outside* [park is a transitive

verb, but here it’s in the passive, so the gap functions as the subject]

Object gap

  • the man who/that/Ø we met outside*
  • the car which/that/Ø we parked outside*

Adverbial gaps (with relative adverbs as relativizers)

  • the time when I was born*
  • the town where I was born*
  • the reason why my parents left me*

whose

• used for genitive gaps (but the head of NP always pied pipes to clause initial position)

– *the man whose you met [__ mother].

– The man [whose mother] you met.

  • used with animate/inanimate antecedents
  • OK in restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses

This is a home for women whose husbands have abused them.

whose and of which (with inanimate antecedents)

  • The survey, whose results will be published in May, has been* delayed.
  • The survey, the results of which will be published in May, has* been delayed.
  • The survey, of which the results will be published in May, has* been delayed. (not quite as common)

ZERO:

  • used in non-subject functions
  • used with animate/inanimate antecedents
  • usually not possible in non-restrictive relative clauses
  • Here is the book/man/cat – I like.* (Od)
  • This was the only day – she showed up for work* (A)
  • *This is the gun/man – killed Liberty.* (S)

But: %There’s someone at the door _ wants to talk to you.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Postmodification by non-finite clauses

A

• Three types:

– ing-participle clauses

the man standing in the corner

– ed-participle clauses

a novel written in the 50s

– infinitive clauses

no way to treat a lady

• Comparison with relative clauses

– no relative pronoun

*the man who standing in the corner etc.

– participle clauses only occur with subject ’gaps’

*the man us meeting ^ at the station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Noun complement clauses

A

• Comparison with relative clauses (and non-finite clauses as

postmodifiers)

– NO gap at all

that is a complementizer rather than a relative pronoun

that is obligatory (in finite complement clauses)

– the complement clause is selected by the head noun (i.e. it is a complement of the noun rather than a postmodifier). Therefore not all nouns take complement clauses, and different nouns take different forms of complement clauses.

• A minimal pair

The rumour that he was ill made us forgive him more easily.

The rumour (that)/(which) he had spread ^ made us forgive him more easily.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Typical nouns that take

that-complement clauses

A

• Nouns expressing ’stance’ (speaker attitude towards the proposition in the complement clause)

– in terms of certainty

fact, possibility, assumption, hypothesis

– in terms of the source of knowledge

claim, report, proposal, remark

• Often nominalizations of verbs that take that-clause complements:

  • I assume that this is correct.*
  • The assumption that this is correct…*
  • Bill remarked that no one has seen him on the murder scene.*
  • The remark that no one had seen him…*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Typical nouns that take

infinitival complement clauses

A

• Nouns representing ”human goals, opportunities, or actions” (p. 304)

attempt, decision, failure, determination, refusal

• These nouns, too, are often nominalizations of verbs, but ones that

take to-infinitival complements:

  • Pierre had failed to notice Natasha.*
  • Pierre’s failure to notice Natasha…*
  • I attempted to take him by the arm.*
  • My attempt to take him by the arm…*
  • China refused to sign the peace treaty.*
  • China’s refusal to sign the peace treaty…*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Other complement types

A

wh-interrogative clause

– Less common than the other types – virtually restricted to occurring with the noun question:

The question whether to confess or not troubled her.

• PPs with wh-clause comlements

– LSGSWE calls these clauses, but structurally they are clearly PPs

The question of how to solve the problem…

– More common than ’plain’ wh-interrogative

• PPs with ing-clause complements (often has alternatives)

  • The idea of switching the lamp…*
  • The idea that they should switch the lamp…*
  • Their chance to go abroad was lost.*
  • Their chance of going abroad…*
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly