Lecture 2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Classes of noun

A

PROPER NOUN

  • Berlin, Mary, Christmas

COMMON NOUN

  • COUNTABLE
    • cat, thing, assumption
  • UNCOUNTABLE
    • butter, furniture, permission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Proper nouns and proper names

A

• Proper nouns vs proper names
– Elevating the notion ’proper name’ (or just ’name’) to a type of NP is one possible solution. So:
– Proper nouns may function as heads of proper names or as heads of ’ordinary’ NPs (like a Mary, etc.)
– Common nouns may also function as heads of proper names:
• The White House, The Observer, The United States
– In fact, a lot of structures that are not even NPs can be proper names. For example, titles of books and other works of art: Who’s afraid of Virginia Woolf?, To the Lighthouse, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Common nouns: [C] and [U]

  • Indefinite article
  • Numerals as determiners
  • Singular or plural
  • Plural or singular quantifiers
  • Pronominal uses of one
A

some differences
Countables (e.g. car) / Uncountables (e.g. news)
May take the indef. art. /Do not take the indef art
Bill had a great car. / *Bill had a great news.

Take numerals as determiners / Do not take…¹
Bill had two great cars. / *Bill had two great news.

May be singular or plural / Always singular¹
This car is nice. / This news is nice.

These cars are nice. / *These news are nice.

Take plural quantifiers (e.g. many) / Take singular quantifiers (e.g. much)¹
Bill had many cars. / Bill didn’t have*many/much news.
OK with various pronominal uses of one / No pronominal uses of one
This car is new, but that one is old. / This furniture is new but that (*one) is old.

¹These only apply to singular uncountables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Countable and Uncountable uses

A
  • Countability is a feature of the interpretation of nouns.
  • Thus, in some cases, one and the same noun may be used either with a countable or uncountable interpretation.
  • Nevertheless, it makes sense to talk about nouns as basically countable or basically uncountable – as long as we remember that it is interpretations or uses we are talking about.
  • Basically [U] used as [C]: Two main types

We’ll have two coffees, please. (’servings of’)

Bill wrote a book about the wines of France. (’kinds of’)

• Basically [C] used as [U]

We’re having chicken for dinner.

There was cat all over the road.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Plural uncountables: scissors, trousers, etc

A

• This is the class of so called bipartite nouns, i.e. nouns referring to clothes, tools, and instruments that consist of two parts.
• More examples: scissors, tweezers, binoculars, glasses, jeans, pants
• Arguments for saying that these are uncountable:
– No number contrast: *scissor, *tweezer, *trouser, *jean

   – Need unit nouns for ’counting’
           two pairs of trousers – \*two trousers (actually OK for some) • How good are the arguments?
    – Singular in compounds/as modifiers:
           a trouser-leg, ladies’ trouser suits
    – Singular in the type-of interpretation (maybe an argument for [U])
           This scissor never needs sharpening. (_must_ refer to type, not individual specimen)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Package nouns (LSGSWE’s term)

A

• Unit nouns: ”Cut up” uncountables into individual units – which can then be counted.
• All unit nouns are countable
• The general unit noun piece combines with a
wide range of uncountables:
– a piece of bacon/chalk/coal/land/paper…
– a piece of advice/information/news/research/work…
• Other quite general unit nouns: bit, item
– a bit of chalk/cake/wood/fun/luck/help…
– an item of clothing/equipment/news/…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Specialized/Typical unit nouns

A

• Many unit nouns occur with a much narrower range of uncountables:
– a grain of sand/truth
– a bar of chocolate/soap/gold
– a drop of water/oil/whisky
– a speck of dust/dirt
– a lump of coal/sugar
– a loaf of bread
– a rasher of bacon ’a thin slice of bacon’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quantifying nouns

A

• When combined with uncountables, quantifying nouns are similar,
if not identical, to unit nouns.
• Quantifying nouns, however, also combine with plural countables.
– See LSGSWE 4.4.3 for a classification of quantifying nouns.
a box of a heap of a pint of

       hundreds of   a mouthful of     a pair of

 – Note than some subtypes only combine with plural nouns: • hundreds of cars but \*hundreds of furniture • a pair of pants(plural [U], remember?) but \*a pair of furniture • In general, as the term suggests, quantificational nouns have meanings related to the quantification/ measurement of entities. • Noticeably absent from the list: **a lot of**. Possible reason: a lot of is **number-transparent**, **hence quite naturally analyzed as a quantifier**: a lot of furniture was… but a lot of people were...
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quantifiers vs Quantifying nouns

A

_Quantifiers vs Quantifying nouns _
Quantifiers function as determiners in NP, and the entity they quantify over is the head of the NP.
– [Many/A lot of] cars are much better than mine.
Quantifying nouns head their NP and the entity they quantify over occurs inside a postmodifying PP.
– A basket [of eggs] was waiting for us in our hotel suite.
• In reality the distinction is slightly problematic:
A number of spots have/*has appeared on the new rug.
The number of spots on the carpet has/*have increased.
Heaps of money has/*have been spent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

of-collectives

A

of-collectives
• Similar both to unit nouns and quantifying nouns, but only combine with plural nouns:
a bunch of idiots/thieves/roses
a crowd of demonstrators/fans
a band of brothers/pioneers/followers
a pack of hounds/wolves
• Again, there are problems in identifying the head of the NP (as well as dialectal differences since these are collective nouns):
A bunch of hooligans were/??was waiting for me outside the pub.
A bunch of flowers was/?were presented to the nice grammar teacher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Species nouns

A

Species nouns
• Refers to types of entities rather than quantity.
• Some specialization
make of N – typically about manufactured things (cars, computers, chairs, etc.)
species of – typically animals, plants
• General species nouns
type/sort/kind of
• Can be followed by countables or uncountables in the postmodifying of-phrase.
• Some agreement issues
These types of cars/car
What sort of thing/things
The safest bet is to use the same number in the species noun and the noun in the of-phrase.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Determiners: The word class

A

Determiners: The word class
• The clear cases (at least in LSGSWE):
– articles: indefinite, definite, zero: a car, the car, __ cars
– possessive determiners: my car, their car, etc.
– demonstrative determiners: this car, those cars, etc.
– quantifiers: all, every, etc.
• Note 1: The word class determiner includes a few more subclasses than we are used to.
• Note 2: It is perfectly fine to define word classes in terms of function.
– So, for example, possessive determiners are determiners because they function as determiners.
– Cf. adjectives vs adverbs:
• He runs fast. (fast is an adverb because it modifies a verb/functions as an adverbial)
• He is a fast runner. (fast is an adjective because it modifies a noun)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Numerals

A

Another seemingly clear case: Numerals
• ”As a word class, numerals consist of a small set of simple
forms /…/” (LSGSWE, p. 34)[my emphasis]
– Numerals have two main functions:
• Determiner (Postdeterminer)
Kim has written fivebooks on this topic.
His first two books were published in 1987.
• Head of NP (similar to pronouns)
Mary bought one book, but I bought two.
Mary bought a book, and I bought one, too.
cf.
Mary liked the book and I liked it, too.
– Million-dollar questions:
• If we have, e.g. possessive determiners and possessive pronouns as different word classes, why don’t we have ”numeral determiners” and ”numeral pronouns” as different word classes?
• Conversely: If numerals form a word class, and numerals can function as determiners or heads of NPs, why don’t we say the same about, e.g. possessive pronouns?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of reference

A

1) Individual entities

  • Indefinite reference
    • Specific: Mary wants to date a Swede. (Has someone in mind.)
    • Unspecific (non-specific): Mary wants to date a Swede. (Has no one special in mind)
  • Definite reference: Mary married the Swede.
    2) Classes (Generic reference): Mary likes Swedes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reference and the indefinite article

A

• Reference to individual entities
– Indefinite + Specific
I met a man at the supermarket yesterday.
– Indefinite + Unspecific
Mary needed a date for the ball.
• Generic
An elephant never forgets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reference and the definite article

A
  • Specific + Definite – The standard case – the speaker assumes that the hearer can uniquely identify the intended referent.
  • Because:– It has been introduced earlier (anaphoric reference)

I bought a snake and a rat and put them in the same cage, but the snake ate the rat.

Anaphoric reference is ”text-internal”. All the hearer is expected to know is that the snake and the rat are the ones mentioned in the first clause. Similarly for indirect anaphoric reference:

– It is associated with a previously mentioned referent (indirect anaphora)

We bought the house, but we will have to fix the roof before we move in.

– The referent is unique (in a given context)

The president has been assassinated.

If the universe is expanding, surely it can’t be infinite.

We’re going to the moon!

– A variant of unique reference (institutional/ sporadic)

Mary goes to the theater at least once a month.

Mary takes the bus to work.

Mary likes listening to the radio.

It is not likely that the definite NPs refer to a unique referent (a specific theater, bus, or radio set). Rather, reference is made to ’institutions’ of society which can be observed at different times in different places.

– The NP has a modifier that provides enough

information for identification

• Premodifiers

I only eat at the best restaurants.

Bill left on the following day.

• Postmodifiers

He buys products in the hope of selling them at an

advanced price.

The bike that Bill bought only had one wheel.

17
Q

Generic reference

A

• Reference to a class, species or kind.

Horses are more intelligent than cats.

• The class can be quite narrow – what is important is that we’re not referring to

individual members of the class.

Art can be difficult to understand.

Modern art can be difficult to understand.

20th century French art can be difficult to understand.

• Generic reference depends on factors other than the NP itself.

Firemen will be available in case of an emergency. (individual members of the class of firemen – so not generic)

Firemen are brave. (applies to the class of firemen as a whole – generic

The elephant can reach a considerable distance with his trunk. (ambiguous – generic or specific)

Bill took a shot at the elephant, but he missed. (specific)

18
Q

Generic reference: possible forms of NPs

A
19
Q

The Genitive

A

• A thing to note: The English genitive is a ’phrasal’

inflectional ending, which means it attaches to the end of NP, rather than to the head noun (only discernible when the NP contains postmodifiers).

– reasonably unmarked examples (head of NP underlined)

  • everybody else’s opinion*
  • a friend of mine’s car * (cf *a friend’s of mine car)

– Informal examples (but better than ones w genitive on the head)

the man opposite me’s facial expression

(cf *the man’s opposite me facial expression)

the man I had been talking to’s reaction

(*the man’s I had been talking to reaction)

– marked examples

the man that we had been complaining to for days’ reaction

(*the man’s we had been complaining to for days reaction)

20
Q

The two functions of genitive NPs

A

Determiner: the specifying genitive (’whose?’ – with possession understood in a very broad sense)

[my mother’s] new husband

[Norway’s] future

Modifier: the classifying genitive(’what kind of N?’)

a [bird’s] nest (’a nest for a bird’)

a [women’s] college (’a college for women’)

Note: Classifying genitives typically do not have

determiners, so maybe they are smaller than NPs.)

21
Q

Postmodification by of-PP

vs

premodification by Genitive NP

A

Genitive

– Animate possessor

  • Anne’s car*
  • the old lady’s car*
  • the dog’s collar*

– Inanimate possessor

?the house’s roof

??democracy’s fate

of-PP

– Animate possessor

??the car of Anne

?the car of the old lady

the collar of the dog

– Inanimate possessor

the roof of the house

the fate of democracy

The main rule – genitive with animate possessors, of-PP with inanimate ones –

virtually always applies, but other factors are certainly at play:

22
Q

Other factors influencing the choice

A

• Syntactic relation between head and determiner/ modifier

– e.g. subjective vs objective genitive

• Semantic relation between head and determiner/modifier

*the gold’s color (cf Swedish guldets färg)

• Category of determiner/modifier

– e.g. Pronouns are much more likely as determiners

  • Collocation
  • Information flow
  • End weight

– Probably why the phrasal nature of the genitive is hard to spot:

if the NP has postmodification, then the genitive tends to be avoided

• Register

(more slides, pages 12-14)

23
Q
A
24
Q
A