Lecture 3: Human Vectors of Dispersal Flashcards
Recap. What is the difference between natural and human mass invasions?
- prehistoric mass invasions were episodic and regional. The current invasion phenomenon is global and continuous
- human assisted dispersal frequently occurs over much greater distances than natural dispersal
- human assisted dispersal events involve larger numbers of introduced organisms
- current invasion rates are orders of magnitude more rapid than in geological history
If something is native to an area, is it native to that entire country/ continent?
- NO
- ## it might not be native to all of it. Scale matters when talking about these things
Describe an example of a sp that is native to one area of a continent but not the entire continent.
- small mouth bass
- eastern and midwestern NA is where it naturally occurs but when it moved across the rockies it was in areas it had no evolutionary history. It is a NA sp but it is only native to a PART of NA.
If a mammal sp was introduced to an area 100 years ago, is it native now?
- NO. bc it would take longer to actually evolve a new form that is adapted to this new region, thus making it native. Especially true with mammals, because evolution is slow in them
Ex: Dingos in Australia..new behaviours developed by native fauna in reaction to it being introduced could be a sign of some threshold that the dingo is becoming native / is. Because there is evolutionary accommodation
What aids in speciation?
- extinctions
- freak environmental disturbances
Explain why the great lakes are a special case of natural invasion?
- invasions leads to diversification to some areas and losses in others
ex: group of crustaceans and molluscs evolved in NA, canalized great lakes thousands of years ago. We don’t call them alien. Why? Bc great lakes was formed thousands of years ago via glacial melt water with living things in it. Geologically young, this area evolves rapidly, invasion occurs of species in the margins/colonise it. But there wasn’t a system to invade bc it was in formation, it was missing whole parts and it didn’t exist thousands of years before that. It took thousands of years to stabilize. There are some sp endemic to it. The diff with this is that the area was young and didn’t have anything native in it, therefore a new system was formed by invasion mech but it’s not invasion of non native sp.
Are all successful introduced exotic sp, equal in establishment
- no
- number of success/ number of total introduction events
- great variation in success ut not so much in plants it vries somewhere between 5-10% for them
- most sp introduced fail (lower than 50% success), esp with fail it tends to be 10-25 in plants
Explain the stages of invasion with the tens rule
- multiple stages where things can fail
- if a variety of conditions are met, they will form a report pop and can sustain itself
- if there are firm boundaries, expansion can be limited
- the rate of spread tends to be related to production of individuals
- ## 10% become established, after you become established, the chance of further population expansion + spread 10%
Explain the tens rule
- most invasions FAIL
- ~ 10% of introduced species become established
- ~ 10% of those established become
Ex: Introduced 100spp -> established 10spp -> invasive 1sp
Why is the tens rule useful?
- to remind us that successful invasions are relatively rare.
- it’s a yard stick to assess which groups of species are unusually successful or prone to failure.
What explains the tens rule?
- factors that determine survival (at low densities) and abundance (ability to increase in numbers).
- many species are introduced into unsuitable habitats
- many species are introduced in small numbers
What organisms does the tens rule seem to work best for ?
- introduced plants
* * there really isn’t a pattern in establishment and spreading across various taxa
What organism were found to violate the tens rule by Jeschke (2008)?
- mammals and birds
- upward bias
- concluded that most invasions fail but some sp are more predisposed to spread and establish better esp if they are good with living with hemans
- some do better than what is expected by tens rule
- *keep in mind most people are not around to see the failures so these establishments could be erroneous , can’t trust the numbers
Explain the overestimation of establishment success of non native birds in Hawaii and Britain
-the lack of information about failed species introductions and the tendency to report species that have become invasive more than those that have not, result in an overestimate of the establishment success and invasion rates of non native species.
What are the barriers to species invasion?
- Geographic barrier
- Physiological barrier
- Demographic barrier
- Biotic resistance
Explain geographic barriers
- responsible for defining the native region originally, preventing the sp from going elsewhere. Can be overcome by natural means like earthquakes or storms etc
Explain what physiological barriers are?
getting past the geographical barrier is not enough. They need a SUITABLE environment, physiologically for them to persist, survive, reproduce etc
Explain what demographic barriers are
- they need to be there in sufficient numbers to start a population take off. For ex: need enough of both sexes or could be a fault of genetics
Explain what the biotic resistance barrier to species invasion is
- resistance from natives. Meet predators or parasites they have no evo history with, that could wipe them out or stop them from establishing
What is a main reason how introduced sp are getting through the four barriers preventing introduction?
- HUMAN VECTORS
- we punch holes in geo barriers , giving OPPORTUNITY
Explain snake fish failed invasion in the USA
- sold illegally through pet trade
- established in some ponds of NE USA, they are adapted to temps in china, so fine with cold therefore no physiological barrier.
- they have not established bc of the demographic barrier, not enough have been dumped
What would it take for a marine mollusc to establish in a marine environment ?
- they need a planktonic larvae
- probs transported as one
- larvae will disperse with ocean current SO they need to be confined in one area so they don’t float off far. A lot will die
- if some settle and develop, now they are all separated. They will reproduce via broadcast spawning BUT if separated by 100skm this won’t happen SO assuming enough ere dumped, , they cannot be separated too far apart, A LOT CAN GO WRONG
- *enough need to be dumped in a confined area