lecture 3 Flashcards
dieters - twins
Pietiliane et al., 2011
- 2000 twins
- dieting twins who took § intentional weight loss episode 2-3x more likely to become overweight compared to non-dieting
dieters - athletes
Saarni et al., 2006
- sample 1,600 male athletes
- those who repeatedly lost and gained weight has increased risk of obesity
- athletes that did this more likely to gain weight once retired
psychological explanation
- Schacter et al., 1975
self-filling bowls - ate 73% more in one condition but felt equally as full
fullness determined by how much people believed to have eaten
shift workers
Sun et al., 2017
- meta analysis of 28 studies
29% more likely to be ones
- increased to 50% when accounting for those who work exclusively night and long term in this role
physiological explanation 2
Buxton et al., 2012
humans that follow shift patterns have slower metabolic rate - 8% less
psychological explanation
Gifkin et al., 2018
- tend to increase snack food consumption –> only food available
Driesen et al., 2010
- increases incidence of depression + stress
Types of food available - Low SES
- believed due to certain food outlets (Freedman + Bell., 2009)
linking food outlets to obesity is correlational and weak (Cobb et al., 2015)
The insurance hypothesis
Nettle 2017
- when food provision scarce, most species seek to store food
- because females can become infertile when undernourished –> more likely to store food during uncertain times
Nettle et al., 2018
- humans respond in similar manner
- food secure at more in taste test
- all moderate by childhood experience of food security
Sim et al., 2018
- manipulated people felt by asking them to imagine when they were mistreated
- relative deprivation predicted intake
Freshman 15: other
Robinson et al., 2014
- peers bad diet –> likely to follow
Holm-Denoma + Vohns, 2008
- relationships w/ parents important factor
- males –> perceived lack of independence prior to uni leads to increased weight gain
Freshman 15: eating in response to stress
- Wansink et al., 2013
eating in response to emotional distress - similar to SES
A psychological explanation of obesenogenic environment
- rely on weight of food (Spence et al., 2014)
- volume of food (Keenan et al., 2015)
A psychological explanation of obesenogenic environment: distraction
- when distracted eat more (Oldham-cooper et al., 2011)
playing computer game
watching TV
working at a desk
improve fullness by remembering what we eat?
recall when return after 3 hours (Hetherington et al., 2006)
counting wrappers + food left (Polivy et al., 1986)
tracking food from app had little effect - Whitelock et al., 2019
The French Paradox
Wansink et al., 2017
- French (paris) eat to point of no longer hungry, US (chicago) ate until full
obesity - predicting across age
- Whitaker et al,. 1997
- Obese children under three years of age without obese parents are at low risk for obesity in adulthood
- older children, obesity is an increasingly important predictor of adult obesity, regardless of whether the parents are obese.