lecture 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why should we assess?

A
  • classification
  • facilitate decision making
  • evaluation
  • data collection

What about psychological assessment?
- a psychological assessment ( as described by the APA) is…
- the gathering and integration of data to evaluate a person’s behaviour, abilities, and other characteristics, particularly for the purpose of making a diagnosis or treatment recommendation.
- - Psychologists assess diverse psychiatric problems (e.g., anxiety, substance abuse) and nonpsychiatric concerns (e.g., intelligence, career interests) in a range of clinical, educational, organizational, forensic, and other settings.
- Assessment data may be gathered through interviews, observation, standardized tests, self-report measures, physiological or psychophysiological measurement devices, or other specialized procedures and apparatuses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is psychological assessment different?

A

devices, or other specialized procedures and apparatuses.
How is Psychological Assessment Different?
- Systematic: not just doing one test: you need multiple need different ways to look at it.
- Driven by assessment questions/ goals.
- Develop and evaluate iterative hypotheses.
- Consider multiple sources of information.
* Integrate ↑ information in drawing conclusions.
o Typically consult clients regarding the accuracy of conclusions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the purpose of assessment?

A
  • Assessment-focused services
    ▪ Stand-alone
    ▪ Answer basic questions and provide recommendations
    ▪ Opinion regarding changes in functioning
    ▪ Conclusions and recommendations may have ↑ consequences
    ▪ Need to consider the context of referral
  • ▫ Intervention-focused assessment services
    ▪ First step in intervention
    ▪ Use to determine appropriate interventions, evaluate progress etc.

Screening
- Identify individuals with/ at risk of developing relevant problems.
Diagnosis
- Integrate data on current symptoms, and compare with diagnostic criteria
▫ Case Formulation
- Develop a comprehensive conceptualization of psychological functioning
▪ Put the client in the context
- Prognosis/prediction
- Predict the future course of psychological functioning
- Difficult – must weigh time/cost of prediction, cost/consequences of making the wrong call
- Influenced by base-rate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is sensitivity & specificity, and what are the differences?

A

Sensitivity
* ▪ True positives/(true positives + false negatives)
* ▪ How often can you accurately detect that _ is present?
* ▪ e.g., how well can you detect who has/will develop an eating disorder
Specificity
* ▪ True negatives/(true negatives + false positives)
* ▪ How often can you accurately detect that _ is not present?
* ▪ e.g., how well can you detect who does not/will not develop an eating disorder
Trade-off
- Consider relative costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what should you consider about treatment

A
  • ▫ Treatment planning
    o ▪ Purpose of most assessment
    o ▪ Decide which treatment will likely be most effective given client characteristics/context
     ▫ Problem identification
     ▫ Set treatment goals (short-term and long-term)
     ▫ Identify treatment strategies/tactics with established effectiveness
  • ▫ Develop a treatment plan in collaboration with the client
  • Treatment monitoring
    o ▪ Crucial to effective treatment
    o ▪ Use formal assessment tools
    o ▪ Alter course as needed
  • ▫ Treatment evaluation
    o ▪ Compare outcome data with intake data
    o ▪ Look at individual clients, clinician, clinics, therapy
    o ▪ Helps set expectations, build informal norms, alert to problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

testing vs. assessment

A
  • ▫ Psychological testing
    o ▪ A particular device is used to gather a sample of behavior in a specific domain
    o ▪ A score is assigned to the resulting sample
    o ▪ This score is compared with the scores of other people in order to interpret it
  • ▫ Tests meet standards of standardization, reliability, validity, and norms
  • ▫ Assessment is more complex, multifaceted
    o ▪ Integrate many sources of information
    o ▪ Develop a coherent, unified description of the client/client’s experience
    o ▪ Tests are just part of the assessment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is reliability

A
  • ▪ Consistency of the test
  • ▪ Internal consistency, test-retest, inter-rater
  • ▪ Specific to purpose and population
  • ▪ Requirements vary but expectations higher for clinical use
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is validity

A
  • ▪ Whether the test measures what it is supposed to
  • ▪ Content, concurrent, predictive, discriminant, incremental
  • ▪ Applies to whole tests and to subscales
  • ▪ Specific to purpose and population
  • ▪ Consider whether likely to be useful for particular client
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what are norms

A
  • ▪ Compare scores to normative sample to interpret
  • ▪ Consider how client’s score relates to cut-off, distribution
    Percentiles, standard scores, developmental norms
    ▪ Consider quality and appropriateness of normative sample
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are important ethical principles?

A
  • Protecting test security College Code of Conduct)
  • ▫ Knowledge of test properties, proper use and interpretation, and limitations (College Code of Conduct)
  • ▫ Acknowledge limitations of conclusions (III.8)
  • ▫ Acknowledge the source of interpretive statements (College Code of Conduct)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

▫ Which of the following would be considered an open question (as opposed to a closed question)?

A
  • Where did you grow up?
  • b) Did you experience heart palpitations?
  • c) When did these problems start?
  • d) What was going on for you at the time? *
  • e) Did your boss get angry at you?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which of the following is an element of effective active listening?

A
  1. a) Paraphrasing
  2. b) Summarizing
  3. c) Asking questions
  4. d) Using reflections
  5. e) All of the above *
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the limits of confidentiality (and relevant laws) ?

A
  • imminent risk of harm to self or others (college code of conduct)
  • child abuse/ neglect (child, family, and community service act)
  • unsafe to drive (motor vehicle act)
  • court order (but not necessarily subpoena, college code of conduct)
  • multidisciplinary/ hospital settings:
    o team
    o file audits.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interviews vs. conversations

A
  • Different contexts and structure
  • Different tone
  • Interviews are confidential.
  • Different purpose and focus
  • Differ in the level of self-disclosure.
  • Differ in how to approach painful topics.
  • Differ in record keeping.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the three types of interviews?

A
  • unstructured
  • semi-structured
  • structured
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are unstructured interviews?

A
  • standard clinical interview
  • Create a safe environment.
  • Structure sessions to ensure that cover relevant topics.
    o Clinician decides what to cover.
     Presenting problem(s), past problems
     Treatment history (including current medications)
     Medical conditions
     Psychosocial history (e.g., childhood, school, work, relationships)
     Goals/ expectations for treatment
    o Ask about difficult topics (e.g., suicidality)
    o Very flexible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what are semi-structured interviews?

A
  • Specific format, a specific sequence
  • Start with a fixed set of questions.
  • There is some flexibility (can ask additional questions)
  • Often include screening questions
    o Ask follow-up questions based on responses.
  • Explicit decision rules
  • Broad coverage
  • Clearly follow diagnostic criteria
  • Improves diagnostic reliability and inter-rater reliability.
  • Can be long.

Examples
- Structured clinical interviews for Axis I Disorders (SCID), SCID-CV (common conditions only), SCID-II
o Parallels DSM Criteria
o Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS)
o Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)
o Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale_ Body Dysmorphic Disorder (YBOCS_BDD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are structured interviews?

A
  • Asked a fixed set of questions in a fixed sequence
  • No deviating from standardized questions
  • More common in research and hospital settings
  • Efficient
    Example:
  • M.I.N.I International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI: can also use as semi-structured)
  • Trade-off = flexibility vs. control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how would you ask about suicidality directly?

A
  • ▪ Suicidal thoughts (frequency, intensity, duration)
  • ▪ Nature of thoughts (general, concrete)
  • ▪ Whether they have a plan (how concrete/specific)
  • ▪ Access to means
  • ▪ Intent to act on thoughts
  • ▪ Do they think they could follow through
  • ▪ Why they consider suicide to be an option
    - Hopelessness
  • ▪ Past attempts
  • ▪ Past self-harm
  • ▪ What has stopped them
  • ▪ Available supports
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

How would you interview couples?

A
  • Focus on one client, couple, or family member
  • Must make space for both people to talk and engage with both partners
  • Look for differences in perspective, interpretation
  • Observe how they interact
  • May need to structure the conversation for the,
  • May also, indeed, individual
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How would you interview families?

A

Interviewing family
- Need to establish rapport with several people
o Attend to each person at some point
- Set expectations upfront
- May need to cut people off
- Normalize (and validate) differences in perspective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

how would you interview older adults?

A
  • Be aware of problems in daily living
  • Health problems may play a bigger role in the presentation
    • Also, medications
  • Concerns may focus on the loss of autonomy, caregiver relationships, bereavement, mortality
  • Make sure to be aware of the purpose of services, establish informed consent/assent
  • ▫ Be sensitive to potential cognitive impairments, differences in style/experiences
  • ▫ May need to involve caregivers
  • ▫ Screen for maltreatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

how would you interview children?

A
  • Kids can provide useful information
  • Observe how to interact with you
  • Explain the purpose of the assessment
  • Adapt approach
    o Make sure understandable
    o More flexible
    o Consider developmental appropriateness.
    o Consider awareness of time
    o Ask questions to clarify, build rapport
    o Alter style
24
Q

what are some key observations to make during interviews?

A
  • Observe relevant behaviour during the interview (e.g., attention, impulsivity, activity level, interpersonal behaviour)
  • Behaviour may be reactive.
  • May supplement with naturalistic observations
    o Home
    o Schools
  • Use to generate hypotheses and combine with other assessment data.
  • Rarely use standardized observational coding systems.
25
Q

what is the Flynn Effect?

A
  • IQ scores on the rise
  • The greatest increase in visuospatial abilities in developing countries.
  • Possible reasons:
    o Factors related to the tests (unlikely)
    o Genetic factors factor (40-80% genetic)
    o Educational improvements
    o Other environmental factors
    o Epigenetic effects
26
Q

How would we define intelligence?

A
  • Definitions range from broad (e.g., ability to learn/adapt) to narrow (e.g., ability to engage in abstract thinking)
  • Have moved from an interest in academic performance to the context of life more generally
  • Wechsler:
    o Capacity to act purposefully, think rationally and deal effectively with his/her environment.
    o Involves a range of problem-solving skills acquired through education and life experience.
  • Current theories:
    o Intelligence = combination of abilities in multiple areas of life ▫ Most tests are limited in scope
27
Q

what are some models of intelligence?

A
  • Factor models
    o Multiple factors at the same level
  • Hierarchical model
    o Lower-order and higher-order factors
  • Information processing model
    o Focus on processes and operations that reflect how the brain handles information.
  • Disconnect between theories of intelligence and how we assess intelligence
28
Q

what is Spearman’s “g”?

A
  • Looked at intercorrelations among sensory tests
  • Two-factor model
     All intellectual activities share a common core
     “G” OR “GENERAL FACTOR”
     More highly correlated = more g
    o Also, specific factors unique to task (i.e., “s”)
    o Performance on task = g +s
  • Not hierarchical
  • The idea of “g” is retained in most theories of intelligence.
29
Q

what are Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities

A
  • Ealy alternative to Spearman’s model
  • Many abilities measured is not highly correlated
    o Influenced by something other than “g”
  • ▫ Primary mental abilities:
    o ▪ Spatial orientation, perceptual speed, numerical ability, associative memory, verbal comprehension, word fluency, reasoning, deduction, and induction
    o ▪ Relatively distinct
    o ▪ Overlap = “g”
  • ▫ Developed a measure of intelligence based on model
30
Q

what is the Catell-Horn-Carroll Theory

A
  • Existing tests too focused on verbal academic tasks
  • Fluid vs. Crystallized intelligence
    o Fluid: the ability to solve novel problems; innate potential
    o Crystallized: what we have learned from education and life experiences
  • ▫ 3 levels: “g”, broad, narrow
  • ▫ Is reflected (to some extent) in Wechsler scales
31
Q

what is Sternberg’s Triarchic theory

A
  • ▫ Rather than “g”, 3 interrelated elements:
    o ▪ Componential: executive functioning, problem-solving, knowledge acquisition
    o ▪ Experiential: problem-solving when faced with novelty/unfamiliarity
    o ▪ Context: ways of interacting with the environment (adaptation, alteration of the environment, selection of a different environment)
  • ▫ Need to consider learning history and environment in understanding intelligent behaviour
32
Q

What is emotional intelligence?

A
  • Ability to perceive, understand, and regulate emotions
  • Many different definitions, many measures
  • Ability-based measures similar to intelligence tests
    o e.g., Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test
    o Perception of emotion, use of emotional information in thinking, understanding emotions, managing emotions
  • Does relate to better social outcomes, achievement, well-being, and adjustment.
  • Not assessed in standard intelligence tests
33
Q

what afre the Weschler scales?

A
  • Motivation = clinical utility
  • Introduced scaled scores (previously compared chronological and mental age)
  • MEAN = 100, SD = 15)
  • ▫ Widely used
  • ▫ Several tests:
    o ▪ Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-IV)
    o ▪ Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
    (WISC-V)
    o ▪ Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-IV)
    o ▪ Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI-II)
  • ▫ Canadian adaptations available
34
Q

What is the structure like in the Weschler scales?

A
  • Full Scale IQ (FSIQ; “g”)
    o Verbal Comprehension Index
     Perceptual Reasoning Index
     Working Memory Index
     Processing Speed Index
  • ▫ Formerly VIQ and PIQ
  • ▫ Good norms (in the USA)
    o Large, representative samples
  • ▫ Some questions culture bound
  • ▫ Use Canadian adaptation!
35
Q

What is The WAIS-IV (Weschler adult Intelligence Scale) ?

A
  • ▫ Ages 16-90
  • ▫ See the textbook for a description of subscales
  • ▫ High reliability (internal consistency
  • ▫ Good validity data
    o ▪ Correlates highly with the WAIS-II, so much of the older validity data is still relevant
    o ▪ Validity is specific to a purpose, population
  • ▫ Canadian normative sample
    o ▪ > 1000 adults
    o ▪ Representative sample
36
Q

What is the WISC-V?

A

▫Ages 6-16 (16 years, 11 months)
* ▫ Slightly different subscales (see textbook)
* ▫ Very good reliability (internal consistency), especially for FSIQ
* ▫ Good validity data
o ▪ Correlates with other measures of intelligence
o ▪ Low correlations with EI
* ▫ Canadian normative sample
▪ 1100 children

37
Q

What is the WPPSI-IV?

A

Ages 2 years 6 months - 7 years 7 months
* ▫ Separate subtests and index scores for different age groups
o ▪ 2y 6m to 3y 11m = verbal comprehension, visual-spatial, and working memory
o ▪ 4y to 7y 7m = verbal comprehension, visual-spatial, fluid reasoning, working memory, processing speed
* ▫ Less emphasis on timed performance, verbal responses
* ▫ Good reliability and validity data, Canadian version available

38
Q

What is the WASI-II?

A

▫ Ages 6-89
* ▫ Much shorter
* ▫ Provides a good estimate of FSIQ
o ▪ Verbal Comprehension Index (vocabulary, similarities)
o ▪ Perceptual Reasoning Index (block design, matrix reasoning)
* ▫ Use when full WAIS is not possible/necessary

39
Q

How do we measure intelligence in babies?

A

▫ Difficult to estimate
* ▫ Some tests rely heavily on parent/caregiver reports
* ▫ Traditional tests consist largely of perceptual and motor responses
o ▪ , e.g., Bayley Scales of Infant Development
o ▪ Poor predictors of intelligence during childhood
 ▫ More relevant for low-scoring infants
 ▫ Largely used for screening
* ▫ Some focus on habituation-dishabituation
o ▪ e.g., Fagan Test of infant Intelligence
o ▪ Better predictor of childhood IQ

40
Q

What is the Standford-Binet test?

A
  • ▫ Ages 2-85
  • ▫ Standardized to mean of 100, SD of 15
  • FSIQ and composite factor scores
    o Verbal and nonverbal IQ
    o Fluid reasoning, knowledge, quantitative reasoning, visual-spatial processing, working memory
  • Good reliability and validity
  • ▫ Good normative data (for the USA only)
  • ▫ No Canadian adaptation/norms
    Scaled scores go higher and lower than Wechsler scores
  • Can be useful for assessing giftedness, intellectual disability
41
Q

What are the Kaufman Scales?

A
  • ▫ Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children
  • ▫ Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test
  • Process-based, focus on how people learn
  • ▫ Subscales quite different from Wechsler
    o e.g., sequential processing, simultaneous processing, mental processing composite, achievement
     Looks at the gap between achievement and potential
  • ▫ Designed to be culturally fair, relevant to educational contexts
  • ▫ Not widely use
42
Q

What are Raven’s Progressive Matrices?

A
  • ▫ Ages 5.5 up
  • ▫ Assesses visual inductive reasoning
  • ▫ Standard, color, and advanced versions
  • ▫ Good measure of “g”, fluid intelligence
  • ▫ Non-verbal, doesn’t require manipulation of objects, minimal verbal instruction
    o ▪ Good for people with language, hearing, or motor impairments
    o ▪ More culturally fair than Wechsler scales
  • ▫ Good reliability, decent validity data, international and local norms available (representativeness unclear)
  • ▫ Provides limited information about strengths/weaknesses
43
Q

What is cognitive assessment and why should we do it?

A
  • Assess functioning in specific domains.
    o Identify strengths and weaknesses
  • Helpful in differential diagnosis, diagnosing neurocognitive disorders
  • Helpful in treatment and discharge planning
  • Primarily conducted by neuropsychologists
  • Helpful to know about tests
  • May be more relevant if working with certain populations or in certain settings
    o Children
    o Older adults
    o Health psychology
44
Q

What are neuropsychological assessments?

A
  • Evaluate cognitive and behavioural functioning
  • ▫ Integrate with intellectual, diagnostic, and personality assessments, medical findings (including imaging)
    ▫ Examine the brain by studying its behavioural products
    o Specific cognitive deficits may indicate underlying pathology
  • May reassess to examine change in functioning over time
  • Use specialized tests
    o Customize the battery based on the referral question
45
Q

Which domains are assessed during an assessment?

A
  • Orientation (Arousal) ▫ Sensation/Perception
    o Attention/Concentration
    o Motor Skills
    o Verbal Functions/Language
    o Visuospatial Organization
    o Memory
    o Judgment/Problem-Solving
    o Symptom Validity Testing
46
Q

Orientation (arousal)

A
  • Assess overall level of consciousness/alertness
    o Awareness of self and the world around them
    o Relevant to performance
    o Can be a symptom of a neurological or psychological problem
  • If low, may have difficulty participating in evaluation, intervention, rehabilitation
  • Examples:
    o Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test
     Assesses confusion and amnesia
     Simple questions (e.g., “ what is your name?”, “where are you now?”)
47
Q

how would you assess sensation/ perception?

A
  • Assess sensation (i.e., reception of stimuli) and perception (i.e., understanding what that stimuli is) to rule out problems
    o May affect performance on other tests
    o May indicate specific neurological problems
    o Visual, auditory, and tactile
  • Examples:
    o Visual field exam
    o Distinguish between similar words (e.g., first – thirst)
48
Q

How would you assess attention/ concentration?

A
  • Attention is critical to learning/memory
  • Look at sustained attention (paying attention over a prolonged period) and selective attention (paying attention to more than one thing at a time)
  • Examples:
    o Mental control tasks – involve simple, overlearned information but require an adequate level of attention (e.g., serial sevens)
    o Attention span – attend to verbal stimuli and repeat (e.g., digit span)
    o Sustained attention (e.g., tap when hearing the number 4)
    o Symbol Digit Modalities Test (scanning, visual tracking, sustained attention)
    o d2 Test of Attention
49
Q

how would you assess motor skills?

A
  • Assess simple or complex motor skills/motor control
    o Gradually more complex, require more integration of cognitive skills
  • Examples:
    o Gross motor – raise right hand
    o Motor speed – touch thumb to forefinger as quickly as you can
    o Fine motor – touch your thumb to each finger, one after the other
    o Ability to perform and inhibit motor behavior – I clap once, you clap twice, now I clap twice, you clap once
    o Graphomotor skills – copy shapes
    o Test for motor apraxia by getting them to demonstrate simple skills
    o Grip Strength
    o Finger Oscillation/Finger Tapping Test
50
Q

How would you assess verbal function/ language?

A
  • Screen for intactness of language
    o Ability to understand, expressive language
  • Examples:
    o Ability to comprehend simple and more complex commands (e.g., turn over the paper, hand me the pen, point to your mouth)
    o Ask to define words
    o Word and phrase repetition/sentence generation
    o Verbal fluency (e.g., name all the animals you can think of)
    o Visual naming
    o Writing, reading, and spelling
    o Token Test (follow commands that relate to tokens)
    o Controlled Oral Word Association Test (verbal fluency via naming words that begin within a single letter; C, F, and L)
51
Q

How would you asses visuospatial organization?

A
  • Assess map skills, route finding, spatial integration and decoding, facial recognition
  • Examples:
    o Directional skills and mazes
    o Clock drawing
    o Motor-free constructional tasks
    o Identify and compare faces, identify emotions
    o Visual sequencing (more integration, higher-order processing)
    o Bender Gestalt Test
    o Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
52
Q

How would you assess memory?

A
  • Assess encoding (ability to put information into storage), retrieval
    o Look for memory defects, memory disorders
  • Immediate and delayed, verbal and visual, recall and recognition
  • Often multiple trials
  • Examples:
    o Word lists
    o Story recall
    o Picture recall
53
Q

what is the Weschler memory scale?

A
  • Assesses episodic declarative memory
  • Start with brief cognitive status test, flexible administration of subtests
  • Immediate, delayed, visual, and auditory memory index scores
    o Subtests described in textbook.
  • Standardized to have a mean of 100, SD = 15
  • Good reliability, good validity
    o Can detect impairment, differentiate between groups
  • Normed with the WAIS-IV
    o American norms valid for Canadians
54
Q

How would you assess judgement/ problem-solving skills?

A
  • Ability to use abstract reasoning, generalize learning from one situation to another, and insight
  • Examples:
    o Proverb interpretation (e.g., you can’t judge a book by its cover)
    o Similarities/differences or analogies (e.g., how are an eagle and a robin alike)
    o Problem-solving tasks (e.g., what should you do if you can’t keep an appointment)
    o Detecting absurdities
    o Trail Making Test
    o Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
    o Tower of London
55
Q

what do achievement tests measure?

A
  • Assess academic and problem-solving skills, how much a person has profited from learning and experience compared with others (not potential)
    o Most influenced by past educational achievement
  • Useful in diagnosing learning differences
    o Watch for notable discrepancies between IQ and achievement
  • Can use to plan remediation
  • Examples:
    o Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement
    o Wide Range Achievement Test
    o Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT)
56
Q

what is The Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (WIAT) ?

A
  • Canadian version available
  • Can be used with Wechsler intelligence scales
    o Easy identification of discrepancies
  • Four composite scores (map onto main LDs):
    o Reading, mathematics, written expression, oral language
    o Subtests described in a textbook
    o First, see if the individual has had an intervention and if with help it helps the LD or if they are still performing badly with intervention.
  • Good reliability and validity
  • Definitely use Canadian norms.