Lecture 2b: Modes of Entry and Internalization Flashcards
What is the Pre-WW2 pattern of internalization?
firms involved in multi-stage production processes faced uncertainty on quantity and price of commodity inputs so internalized ownership of value chain:
vertical integration
What is the Post-WW2 pattern of internalization?
firms with brands, marketing skills as intellectual property (IP) faced buyer uncertainty and risk of IP leaks if licensing, hence internalized application of brand and marketing know-how across multiple products leading to international business based on diversification and product/service scope
What is the Post-2000 pattern of internalization?
– firms with network platforms and network effects facing buyer
uncertainty, uncertain revenue streams and risk of IP leaks internalize ownership &
application of network platform across multiple markets: Facebook, Uber
what are the two theories of the internationalization process?
learning/stages model vs. born global
describe the “learning model” or stages theory of internationalization?
Johanson & Vahne, 1977, 1990
- gradual experiential learning or developing capabilities
1. Initially no regular exports
2. Exports via third parties (agents or distributors)
3. Establishment of own foreign sales affiliates (bricks & mortar on sales side)
4. Establishment of foreign production facilities
Describe the born global idea of internationalization
McKinsey & Co., 1993; McDougall, Shane, Oviatt 1994; Madsen & Servais 1997
**why/how do some new ventures leapfrog
traditional stages and quickly become international?
- Entrepreneurial vision
- Mobile knowledge-intensive resources
- Network platform (Facebook, Spotify, SoundCloud)
How do small and medium size firms acquire/learn capabilities for internationalization?
• Learn capabilities through following – Domestic trade association (social capital and domestic cluster in Chile agricultural processing) (Perez-Aleman, 2005) – Regional trade association before going international (Toulan & Guillen 1996) – Affiliation with multinational firm as part of international supply chain (Sobrero & Toulan 2000) • Indirect internationalization (indirect exporting): Sell components to larger local firm which is international, thereby becoming part of international supply chain and learning global quality standards (Toulan & Guillen 1997) • Local firms become the vehicle for multinational corporations trying to market to the “bottom of the pyramid” (Prahalad & Hart 2002)
What are the non-equity entry modes? (7)
- Exporting
- Licensing
- Franchising
- Contract manufacturing (outbound)
- Management contract
- Turnkey operation
- Strategic alliances (sometimes lead to acquisition)
What are the equity entry modes?
• Equity alliance (minority stake in alliance partner)
• Joint ventures
• Mergers (not covered as entry mode in textbook)*
• Wholly-owned subsidiaries (FDI)
– Acquisition vs. Greenfield
What are the decision factors for modes of entry?
• ownership advantages • location advantages • internationalization advantages • other factors 1. need for control 2. resource availability 3. global strategy
Choice among entry modes: If firm has low experience & or low resources, then choose
– Exporting – Leasing – Licensing, management contract, turnkey – Contract manufacturing (downstream) – Strategic alliance
Choice among entry modes: If learning goal
– Strategic alliance
– Equity alliance
– Joint venture
– Management contract (host is the learner), turnkey
– Licensing (opportunity to reverse-engineer)
Choice among entry modes: If firm has distinctive competencies, then
– If technological competency
• Wholly-owned subsidiary is preferred over licensing, strategic alliances and joint ventures
– If management competency
• Franchising, licensing, management contract, joint ventures, equity alliance, wholly-owned subsidiary
Choice among entry modes: If firm needs control (to protect intellectual property [IP], reputation, or integrated
global strategy/coordination) then
Wholly-owned subsidiary
Choice among entry modes:If goal increased market
power and/or scale/scope economies, then perhaps
• Merger