Lecture 2.2 Flashcards

1
Q

What impairment occurs when the auditory analysis system is impaired?

A

pure word deafness

impaired auditory understanding with intact comprehension, reading, and writing

can hear stimuli but can’t do anything with it

but could understand the same information in writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What impairment occurs when the auditory input lexicon is impaired?

A

word meaning deafness

can analyze the signal to recognize that it is a word (vs. environmental sound) but can’t identify if they know the word

may not understand, but can still repeat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What impairments occur if there is damage to pathway #3 (auditory input lexicon to semantic system)?

A

difficulty understanding heard words but can distinguish non-words from words

can repeat real and non-words via route #11

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What impairment occurs when the semantic system is impaired?

A

unable to access semantic construct associated with a heard word, read word, or object

results in “deep” impairments
- semantic dementia/AD/agnosias

semantic errors (ex. read boat as yacht)

concrete concepts easier than abstract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the key difference between dementia and aphasia?

A

dementia = losing concepts

aphasia = having difficulty accessing meaning for these concepts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would happen if there was damage to the semantic system as well as pathways #3 and 7 (leading from auditory and visual input lexicons)?

A

semantic paraphasias of various types

ex. fork for spoon, cat for dog, orange for apple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a semantic paraphasia?

A

paraphasia = close to language

semantic = meaning

confusing a word for a word within the same semantic category

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What would happen if there was damage to the speech output lexicon?

A

phonological errors or failure to retrieve

frequency effect: more phonological errors on lower frequency words
- ex. ball = ball, palette = mallet

possible to have partial access to lower frequency words (recall part of the word)

neologisms or target-related words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a neologism?

A

made up words

may resemble target word

ex. pulopus for octopus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What impairments happen if there is damage at the phoneme level?

A

phonological paraphasias
- words related in sound to target word

dat for cat
tob for top

not influenced by frequency effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What impairments happen if there is damage at the visual analysis system?

A

peripheral alexia

difficulty processing/analyzing graphemes in words

telling what are and are not graphemes vs. other random symbols

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What impairments happen if there is damage at the visual input lexicon?

A

difficulty reading/recognizing known words

difficulty distinguishing words with similar spellings
- calm vs. clam

misreading errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens if there is damage to pathway #7 (between visual input lexicon and semantic system)?

A

difficulty understanding written words, assigning meaning to what you are reading
- can read dog, but dog = ?

can discriminate real vs. pseudowords

auditory comprehension, speaking, writing near normal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What impairments happen if there is damage to grapheme-phoneme conversion?

A

able to read real words better than non-words

can understand apple vs. azzle or alzze or zelaz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What impairments occur when there is damage to the grapheme output lexicon and phoneme-grapheme conversion?

A

regularization errors

ex. sord for sword, fone for phone

able to spell (writing) real words better than non-words
- if they struggle with non-words, good indicator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What impairments occur if there is damage at the grapheme level, allograph level, or graphic motor patterns?

A

peripheral agraphia

case errors
letter formation errors
script to print errors
insertions, repetitions
- ex. stestephanie for Stephanie