lecture 2. State formation Flashcards

1
Q

What is a sovereign state?

A

**Westphalian sovereignty
External sovereignty: ** no authority above the state - de jure
Internal sovereignty: exclusive authority on territory and population- de facto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Montevideo convention on Rights and Duties 1933:
The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications:

A
  • a permanent population
  • a defined territory
  • Government, and capacity to enter into relations with the other state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

..WEBER :Modern state formation is about power and legitimacy

A

Politics: distribution, maintenance, or transfer of power.

Authority: legitimate power, power without coercion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Weber: Different definitions of Authority

A

Traditional authority: the eternal yesterday
* it has always been there, for example monarchies.

Charismatic authority: the personal ‘’gift of grace’’.
* Qualities located in the individual, he/she can lead, people follow.

in Afghanistan: Warlords, if they go it is very hard to institutionalize their power.

**Legal/ rational authority: **the virtue of legality (ruler)
–> Weberian state.
This was in Afghanistan the goal between 2000-2021.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Robert Dahls definition of power

A

Having the ability to make someone do something, they would not have done it/ influencing others.

–> Authority is the legitimation of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Modern state formation is about violence

A

The state cannot be defined in terms of its end.
The state can only be defined in terms of its specific means: the use of physical force.

If no social institutions existed which knew the use of violence: Anarchy (Hobbes, Leviathan)

Force is not the normal or only means of the state (Machiavelli, The Prince)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weber:
modern state formation is about violence
What is a state:

A

The state is a human community that (succesfully) claims the monopoly of the **legitimate use of physical force** within a given territory. ‘’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Weber:
modern state formation is about: monopolizing resources

How do power holders maintain their domination?

A
  • Control the personal executive staff
  • Control the material means of administration
  • End of indirect rule:
    • Lords, warlords, any actor in civil society that holds authority
    • Expropriate the expropriators: state/ society struggle (Migdal)
    • Society: societal actors like warlords, religious leaders –> need to neutralized.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Weber:

modern state formation is about: bureaucratization

A
  • Establish a bureaucracy (Weberian state)
    *. professional politicians who do not wish to be lord themselves bu tenter the service of political lords.
  • Can the bureaucratic state be exported? Can the Western experience be reproduced
  • Can warlords be bureaucrats? (Mukhopadhyay)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

War making and state building as Organized Crime: Charles Tilly

Modern State formation is about warmaking, protection, and extraction

A

Statemaking
Warmaking
Protection
Extraction

=Tilly sees this s a historical process; within European Statemaking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Charles Tilly: Statemaking

A

Eliminating or neutralizing their rivals inside their territories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Charles Tilly: Warmaking

A

Eliminating or neutralizing their rivals outside their teritories

Weber: Expropriate the expropriators: state/ society struggle (Migdal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Charles Tilly: Protection

A

Eliminating or neutralizing the enemies of their clients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Charles Tilly: Extraction

A

Acquiring the means of carrying out the first 3 activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Warmaking is about protection and extraction… Hence state making

A
  1. Power holders go to war
  2. War makers need resources
    * short run: conquest, selling off assets, coercing or dispossessing accumulators of capital
    * Long run: tax the population (extraction) promote capital accumulation by those who can help them borrow and buy protection
  3. War makers end up building states

> War making, extraction, and capital accumulation interacted to shape European state making.

> Capitalism and state making reinforce each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Issue with Charles Tilly his arguments

Charles Tilly neglects external relations

A

External relations shape every nation state:
1. Flows of resources (loans +supplies)
2. Competition among states stimulates war making
3. Coalitions of states force states into certain forms and posiitions within the international system.

16
Q

Michael Mann (“Infrastructural Power Revisited,” Studies in Inter

Mann: Modern state formation is about territorizalation and centralization:

Two kinds of power:

A

Infrastructural power
Despotic power

17
Q

Infrastructural power (Mann)

A

The capacity of the state to actually penetrate civil society and implement actions across its territories.

*. Derives from the social utility of a state that is multi-function and centralized
* Similar to Hobbes about safety/ protection.
*. It mainstains welfare, military infrastructure
Grows over time
Here people give up a bit of freedom ‘‘voluntary in order for protection

18
Q

Despotic power (Mann)

A

The rance of actions that the state elite is empowered to make without consultation with society groups (autonomy of power)

  • derives from inability of civil society to control the mulitplicity of state functions (this creates a manoevring space)
  • Varies over time
  • Eventually the state elites will meet resistance
  • Without asking anyone
19
Q

Levels of Despotic power/ infrastructural Power Afghanistan

low despotic/ low infrastructural power: Feudal
HIgh despotic/ low infrastructural power: imperial
low despotic/ high infrastructural power: Bureaucratic: democratic
high despotic/ high infrastructural power:
Authorian: single party

A

The issue of Afghanistan is not about monopoly of violence, but that one group attempts to grasp power.

Pre- 2021: Afghanistan would fit in the middle, it was very hard to reach people

Post 2021: Afghanistan would fit between imperial and authoritarian:
There is some level of infrastructural power, and its despotic.

20
Q

Empire of Ahmad Shah Durrani (1747)

A
  • King of Afghans
  • Abdali/ Durrani Tribal confereration (Kandahar)
  • Conquest empire of non-Pashtun lands
  • Administer conquests (not govern the tribes)
  • No centralized army
  • Disputes between ruler and tribes
    *opposite of what Mann speaks about: centralization/ infrastructural power.
21
Q

Great Game & First Anglo-AFghan War

(1839-1842)

What is the Great game

A

Rivalry between Russian Empire and British one,
Begin of 19th centrury

22
Q

Great game/ Anglo-Afghan War:
Similarities with Soviet-Afghan war

A
  • Geopolitical context (security dilemma)
  • Jihad
23
Q

Great game/ Anglo-Afghan War:
Similarities with Post-2001 intervention

A
  • Fear of Islamic fundamentalism
  • Fear of ‘‘state failure’’
  • Regime change

Kim & Flashman (books)

24
Q

Abdur Rahman Khan as the Iron Emir
1880- 1901

A
  • Centralized army (and conscription)
  • Islamic authority; establishment of Sharia courts
  • Defensive JIhad
  • Taxation
    * War making and state making as organized crime.
25
Q

Second Anglo-Afghan war
1878-1880

A

Autonomy: British control of foreign affairs
Treaty of Gandamak (1879) + Durand line (1893)
–> leads to buffer state of Abdur Rahman Khan
Buffer state: internal autonomy+ external support

26
Q

Amanullah’s failed modernization
1919-1929

A
  • Third Anglo-Afghan War + Independence (1919)
  • Amanullah’s reign as story of state/society struggle
  • Amanullah fails to expand infrastructural power
  • He tries to fast, and eventually has to flee
    He wanted a progressive state too fast, with parliamentary democracy
27
Q

The Musahiban Dynasty

1929-1978

A

1929-1978
* inability to penetrate or trasnform society as a whole
* Reliance on the international system
- Taxes on foreign trade
- Foreign aid
- Sales of natural gas to the Soviet Union

*No process of state formation

28
Q

Conclusions

A

A story of state centralization and resistance to it

A story of legitimacy and lack thereof

The failure of modern state formation

Did the international community prevent the successful formation of the Afghan state?