Lecture 2 - Clinical Questions and Study Types Flashcards

1
Q

What is the hierarchy of evidence (for intervention questions primarily)?

A
  1. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
  2. RCT
  3. Pseudo-randomized controlled trial
  4. Cohort Studies (comparative)
  5. Case Control Studies (comparative)
  6. Case Series
  7. Case Reports
  8. Expert opinion, editorials, ideas
  9. Animal research
  10. In vitro (test tube) research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the study design hierarchy?

A
  1. RCT (only one that is experimental)
  2. Cohort Study
  3. Case Control Study
  4. Cross sectional study / clinical observational
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

For diagnostic purposes, which study type is preferred?

A

Cross sectional with reference standard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

For therapeutic purposes, which study type is preferred?

A

RCT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For prognostic purposes, which study type is preferred?

A

Inception cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For risk factor/etiology purposes, which study type is preferred?

A

RCT (but it’s often not ethical or feasible) so Cohort or Case control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

For prevalence/frequency purposes, which study type is preferred?

A

Random Sample / Cross sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some key points of Case series?

A
  • Raise awareness of an important issue
  • Learning example
  • New diseases or treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some key points of Cross-sectional studies?

A
  • Observational studies

- Insights into diseases and associations (example is smoking and lung cancer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which studies have control groups?

A
  • Case control study
  • Cohort studies
  • RCT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How are case control studies organized?

A

Cases with disease or ‘outcome’ enrolled, then control group of similar patients without disease collected

(you look back in time to see what the patient was exposed to and not exposed to)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How are cohort studies organized?

A

Subgroups within the cohort become ‘control’ or comparison groups (eg smokers vs non-smokers compared to see if a particular outcome different these groups. May be multiple comparison groups in one cohort)

*Direction of inquiry is looking forward not looking back like case control studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How are RCT studies organized?

A

Study participants selected, then randomized into intervention or control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are some strengths of case control study?

A
  • Good for rare disease or disease with long lead times
  • Less expensive
  • Smaller participants needed than cohort or RCT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some weaknesses of case control study?

A
  • Less accurate and less able to inform cause than cohort and RCT
  • Controls not similar enough to cases
  • Recall bias exists (people with disease may be more likely to remember past exposures than those without disease)
  • Confounding (try to control with stratification and statistical adjustment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is “retrospective cohort” different from case control studies?

A

In a retrospective cohort all subjects, whether diseased or non-diseased have been identified as a ‘group’ (co-hort) at some stage in the past AND EXPOSURE DATA COLLECTED AND RECORDED IN PATIENTS’ FILE (minimize recall bias)

17
Q

Which is more accurate, a prospective cohort study or a retrospective cohort study?

A

Prospective cohort

18
Q

What is a strength of a cohort study?

A

Most accurate way to assess natural history of disease, and prognostic variables

19
Q

What are weaknesses of a cohort study?

A
  • Selection bias (particularly ‘non-participation’ bias)

- Long duration of study for ‘slow’ diseases – adds to cost, potential for significant ‘loss to follow-up’

20
Q

What are strengths of RCTs?

A
  • More certainty at informing causation

- Minimize bias and confounding factors if well designed and conducted

21
Q

What are weaknesses of RCTs?

A

Feasibility problems are the main problems.

  • ethical questions can arise
  • can be costly
  • can be too general as trials are done under ‘idea’ situations in refined patient groups