Lecture 2/3 Flashcards
methods in psychopathology research
controlled experimental study
quasi-experimental studies
correlational/cross sectional studies
quasi-experimental studies
not randomly assigned by match the experimental group of control
quasi-experimental studies
nto randomly assigned byt match experimental group to control group on as much points as possible
corelational/ cross-sectional study
cant make firm causal explanations
longitudinal designs aim to understand
causailty by trying to establish temporal precedence
types of longitudinal studies
retrospective, follow-up studies, high-risk studies
retrospective studies
collect sample of people with disorder, try to determine what preceded it
what do retrospective studies rely on
self report
why is it problematic to rely on self report
people dont perfectly remember events and mood can influence recall
what does retrospective use in order to avoid problems with self-resports
existing archival data
what are retrospective studies evidence for
current states result in memory biases
what are challenges of retrospective
lack of control over data you get
not everyone has the same records
follow up
follow peopel with the disorder overtime and see what happens
whats something that needs to be present in order for it to be follow-up
already ill sample
what are challenges of follow up
difficult to derive etiological explanations
what are follow up designed for
to understand the course/natural course of the diagnosis
high risk studies
variant of follow-up
identify likley people to develop a disorder
what does high risk study look for and what is it in the basis of
offspring of people with disorder and biological abnormality
what are challenges of high risk studies
if recreuiting offspring may not recruit a representative sample
cons of high risk
genetic: need to find people who have the disorder and also children
biological: associations not well-proven
behavioural: may be a risk factor; early manifestation of the disease
vulnerability markers
something that tells you the person is vulnerable to the disorder
what should vulnerability markers be
traitlike not state-related : should be something that is a characteristic of that person and evident before theyre ill
wha do vulnerability markers have to be
corelated with the disorder, but has to persist beyond the end of the episode
what else has to be done in order for it to be a vulnerability marker
present in a high-risk population and pre-date the disorder
case control
compare one group of people with disorder to a second group of people without the disorder: most helpful if the disorder you’re looking at is fairly rare
cohort
a single large sample of people some of whom have the disorder of interest to multiple control groups
what tends to be common but most useful is the disorder is rare
case control
what is preferable when it is not rare
cohort
patient populations
not representative of people with the disorder int he community. not all disorders people seek treatment
clinical populations
tend to be more severe, have more comorbidities, more likely to be female, and chronic
general population
get a sense of disorder in the wild; what does it look like on average but tends to be closer to the diagnostic threshold: MISDIAGNOSIS MORE LIKELY
if you study people from other ppulations outside of the ones youre studying
allows you to make more specific inferences
match controls on potential confounds
If you are screening people who are healthy controls , you want them to have never had a diagnosis of psychopathology (super healthy controls).You want to typically match your controls on basic demographic variables
why does the above present a danger
systematically mismatching on other variables. It may be impossible to consistently match on every demographic variable of interest .
what is a proband
someone in the family who has been diagnosed with the disorder theyre looking at