Lecture 19 - Models of Memory Flashcards
Adaptive Control of Thought (ACT)
took some of the shortcomings of the hierarchical model and tried to build on top of them
to address the short-comings and salvage that type of approach
Parallel distributed processing (PDP)
new direction, new architecture
scrapped hierarchical model
What are the criticisms of the hierarchical model of long-term memory?
People verify typical instances of a category faster than atypical examples (typicality effect).
Some activations seem to go around the hierarchical order
People consider similarities when evaluation sentences.
advantage of hierarchical system
It forces you to make natural inferences based on limited information.
these inferences would explain why sometimes a partial cue would be useful in bringing up an entire concept
little activation tags going from node to node
why do we want models in the first place?
we still need models of
memory in order to make testable predictions about how the system operates .
The distinctions suggested by the types of long-term
memory attempt to establish
categories of knowledge that can be learned over time.
Adaptive control of thought (ACT) theory
− Information is discrete (concepts held within individual nodes) and modular
concepts held within individual nodes in a very tight modular sense activate a concept and have discrete links to other concepts
- fix hierarchical model
Parallel distributed processing (PDP) models
− Information is distributed and has more plasticity (links can change in their nature)
- hiercharcy is based on a computer model and we need something biologically based
- there are no individual nodes that hold an entire concept: concepts distributed over many different units
Each model has its own form of
mental representations and
processing of those representations.
The adaptive control of thought (ACT)
theory is a general model of human
cognition (Andersen 1976, 1983, 1991).
• Based on a hierarchical model of memory.
• Built as a computational /symbolic model (including software), but more recently
includes data from cognitive neuroscience.
• The representation of declarative memory includes episodic and semantic elements.
• The basic representational unit is the proposition [originally chunks], and
processing occurs through spreading activation (makes more active) of different propositions
Propositions
are the smallest unit of
meaning that can be true or false.
They encode declarative facts.
some chunk of information that can be falsified
e.g. The canary is yellow.
(propositions that are false are still propositions)
Propositions must have two elements:
- Nodes: A concept or idea (e.g. bird, person,
canary, rhinoceros). - Links: The semantic association between
nodes (agent, relation, or object).
A single sentence or thought can contain many propositions.
e.g. Fiona is pretty and on parole. (True, Yes a proposition, 2 propositions that each can have their own truth value)
A single sentence or thought can contain many propositions.
The propositions may be embedded (or nested).
Ned believes [that winter is coming].
object link: indicates that another proposition is being acted on
Catelyn doubts [that Ned believes [that winter is coming]].
Both semantic and episodic memories are part of the ACT model.
This requires a type-token distinction.
• A type refers to a general concept (i.e.. node, canary) or class of objects. [Semantic memory: what is a canary?] => is all of them
• A token refers to a specific instance of a type (a specific canary). [Episodic memory]
=> is one of them